13.01.2013 Views

“Dialogue – possible between leader and follower?” - Ashridge

“Dialogue – possible between leader and follower?” - Ashridge

“Dialogue – possible between leader and follower?” - Ashridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• The very rich parallel process that exists; we are a group talking about<br />

dialogue <strong>and</strong> our experiences of it, however we are at the same time<br />

exploring dialogue as experienced in the moment within the group. I think<br />

this is enormously important methodologically as I hinted at when<br />

discussing Cunliffe <strong>and</strong> Eriksen’s (2011) ethnographic approach above. For<br />

example we have discussed what we think ‘<strong>leader</strong>ship’ is but I find that<br />

this tends to generate st<strong>and</strong>ard cognitive answers which reflect classic<br />

teaching in <strong>leader</strong>ship. However, the quality of response, engagement <strong>and</strong><br />

thoughtfulness which has come from defining what <strong>leader</strong>ship means now,<br />

in this group, at this moment, however has been richer.<br />

• The challenges involved in ‘co-researching’ with others <strong>and</strong> how this can<br />

work in practice whilst holding a facilitator role. I have found co-<br />

researching to be a useful ambition <strong>and</strong> intention to hold but it is<br />

unavoidable <strong>and</strong> without doubt that I have more ‘skin in the game’ than<br />

the others. Because ‘I am the one doing the PhD’, I could potentially<br />

influence the direction of conversation more however I notice that<br />

because I am so aware of this I have shied away from taking such a<br />

powerful role to the extent that perhaps I have not been assertive enough<br />

<strong>and</strong> other members of the group have wished me to direct the<br />

conversation more.<br />

• How the method enables very clear examination of personal bias <strong>and</strong><br />

assumptions which shine a light on how such issues must affect more<br />

traditional research methods. For example, the group has helped me to<br />

realise that I tended towards a negative view of power which I had not<br />

previously recognised. I would filter people’s comments on power<br />

accordingly. I have also explored my own power; in fact I could be seen<br />

as belonging to many ‘powerful’ categories such as being white, well<br />

educated, reasonably well-off financially; the only category really which<br />

might be seen as less powerful is that of being a woman <strong>and</strong> perhaps, in<br />

some contexts in business being relatively young (although still nearly<br />

40!). It has been interesting talking through this with the group <strong>and</strong> the<br />

effect it might have.<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!