“Dialogue – possible between leader and follower?” - Ashridge

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Bradbury, H. and Lichtenstein, B. M. B. (2000), "Relationality in organizational research: Exploring The Space Between", Organization Science, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 551-564. Buber, M. (2002), Between man and man, Routledge, London. Buber, M. (1958), I and Thou 2nd ed, T&T Clark, London. Caldwell, C. and Dixon, R. (2010), "Love, Forgiveness, and Trust: Critical Values of the Modern Leader", Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 91- 101. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002), Flow, 1st ed, Rider, London. Cunliffe, A. L. and Eriksen, M. (2011), "Relational leadership", Human Relations, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 1425-1449. Dachler, H. P. and Hosking, D. M. (1995), "The primacy of relations in socially constructing organizational realities", in Hosking, D. M., Dachler, H. P. and Gergen, K. J. (eds.) Management and organization: Relational alternatives to individualism, Avebury, Aldershot, pp. 1-29. Deetz, S., ( 2010), personal communication. Deetz, S. and Simpson, J. (2004), "Critical Organizational Dialogue", in Anderson, R., Baxter, L. and Cissna, K. N. (eds.) Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies, Sage, London, pp. 141-158. Deetz, S. (2003), "Reclaiming the Legacy of the Linguistic Turn", Organization, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 421. Fletcher, J. and Kaufer, K. (2003), "Shared Leadership", in Pearce, C. and Conger, J. (eds.) Shared Leadership: Reframing the how's and why's of leadership, Sage, London, pp. 21-47. Freire, P. (1990), Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Rowman and Littlefield, New York. Friedman, M. S. (1983), The confirmation of otherness, in family, community, and society, Pilgrim Press, New York. Gadamer, H. G. (1989), Truth and Method, 2nd, Revised ed, Crossroad, New York. Gergen, K. J., McNamee, S. and Barrett, F. J. (2001), "Toward transformative dialogue", International Journal of Public Administration, vol. 24, no. 7,8, pp. 679-707. Graen, G. B. and Uhl-Bien, M. (1995), "Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective", The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 219-247. 38
Habermas, J. (1984), The theory of communicative action, Polity, Cambridge. Hammond, S., Anderson, R. and Cissna, K. N. (2003), "The problematics of dialogue and power", Communication Yearbook, vol. 27, pp. 125-157. Heath, R. (2007), "Rethinking Community Collaboration Through a Dialogic Lens: Creativity, Democracy, and Diversity in Community Organizing", Management Communication Quarterly : McQ, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 145-171. Heidlebaugh, N. J. (2008), "Invention and Public Dialogue: Lessons from Rhetorical Theories", Communication Theory, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 27-50. Hosking, D. M. (1988), "Organizing, Leadership and Skilful Process", The Journal of Management Studies, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 147-166. Hosking, D. M. (2007), "Not leaders, not followers: A postmodern discourse of leadership processes", in Shamir, B., Pillai, R., Bligh, M., et al (eds.) Follower-centred perspectives on leadership: a tribute to the memory of James R. Meindl, Information Age, Charlotte, NC, pp. 243-263. Isaacs, W. N. (1999), Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together, Doubleday, New York. Isaacs, W. N. (2001), "Toward an action theory of dialogue", International Journal of Public Administration, vol. 24, no. 7,8, pp. 709-748. Karlsen, M. P. and Villadsen, K. (2008), "Who should do the talking? The proliferation of dialogue as governmental technology", Culture & Organization, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 345-363. Kim, J. and Kim, E. J. (2008), "Theorizing dialogic deliberation: Everyday political talk as communicative action and dialogue", Communication Theory, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 51-70. Kramer, K. (2003), Martin Buber's I and Thou: Practicing living dialogue, Paulist Press, New York. Ladkin, D. (2010), Rethinking Leadership: A new look at old leadership questions Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. Levinas, E. (1969), Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority, Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, PA. Lichtenstein, B. B., Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., Seers, A., Orton, J. D. and Schreiber, C. (2006), "Complexity leadership theory: An interactive perspective on leading in complex adaptive systems", Emergence: Complexity & Organization, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2-12. McPhail, L. (2004), "Race and the (im)possibility of dialogue", in Anderson, R., Baxter, L. and Cissna, K. N. (eds.) Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies, Sage, London, pp. 209-224. 39
Page 1 and 2: “Dialogue - possible between lead
Page 3 and 4: 2. Background It is difficult for m
Page 5 and 6: 3. Literature Review a. Dialogue Th
Page 7 and 8: Figure 1: the historical developmen
Page 9 and 10: Both sets of authors have in common
Page 11 and 12: academic work linking the two areas
Page 13 and 14: accessible to a pragmatic individua
Page 15 and 16: and Uhl-Bien, 1995) and charismatic
Page 17 and 18: many of their propositions are cert
Page 19 and 20: to leadership theory” (2008:253).
Page 21 and 22: i. Inhibitions to leader-follower d
Page 23 and 24: can easily grow into a feeling that
Page 25 and 26: Research questions, methodology and
Page 27 and 28: A methodology which has grown in us
Page 29 and 30: My experiences of co-operative inqu
Page 31 and 32: • The very ambiguous and uncertai
Page 33 and 34: • As the above points indicate, i
Page 35 and 36: Where next? The process of co-opera
Page 37: References Anderson, R., Baxter, L.
Page 41: Stewart, J. and Zediker, K. (2000),

“Dialogue – possible between leader and follower?” - Ashridge

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?