“Dialogue – possible between leader and follower?” - Ashridge

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Morrell, K. (2004), "Socratic dialogue as a tool for teaching business ethics", Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 383-392. Oswick, C., Anthony, P., Keenoy, T., Mangham, I. L. and Grant, D. (2000), "A dialogic analysis of organizational learning", Journal of Management Studies, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 887-901. Pauly, J. (2004), "Media studies and the dialogue of democracy", in Anderson, R., Baxter, L. and Cissna, K. N. (eds.) Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies, Sage, London, pp. 243-258. Reason, P. W. (1988), "Introduction", in Reason, P. W. (ed.) Human inquiry in action Sage, London, pp. 1-17. Reason, P. W. (1999), "Integrating action and reflection through co-operative inquiry", Management Learning, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 207. Reason, P. W. and Bradbury, H. (2001), Handbook of action research: Participatory inquiry and practice, Sage, London. Reason, P. W. and Heron, J. (1997), A short guide to co-operative inquiry, available at: http://www.human-inquiry.com/cishortg.htm (accessed October 2011). Reitz, M. (2007), "Leading in the moment", Ashridge 360, vol. Spring, pp. 24- 29. Rogers, C. (1967), On Becoming a Person, 1st ed, Constable, London. Senge, P. M. (2006), The Fifth Discipline, 2nd ed, Random House, London. Shamir, B., House, R. J. and Arthur, M. B. (1993), "The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory", Organization Science, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 577-594. Shotter, J. (2006), "Understanding process from within: An argument for 'withness'-thinking ", Organization Studies, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 585-604. Simpson, J. L. (2008), "The color-blind double bind: Whiteness and the (im)Possibility of dialogue", Communication Theory, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 139- 159. Slotte, S. (2006), "Systems sensitive dialogue intervention", Systems Research & Behavioral Science, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 793-802. Stanford University (2007), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Martin Buber, available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/buber/ (accessed 2/10/10). Stevenson, W. (1963), "I-Thou and I-It: An attempted clarification of their relationship", Journal of Religion, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 193-209. 40
Stewart, J. and Zediker, K. (2000), "Dialogue as tensional, ethical practice", Southern Communication Journal, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 224-242. Stewart, J., Zediker, K. and Black, L. (2004), "Relationships among philosophies of dialogue", in Anderson, R., Baxter, L. and Cissna, K. N. (eds.) Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies Sage, London, pp. 19-20. Strine, M. (2004), "When is communication intercultural? Bakhtin, staged performance, and civic dialogue", in Anderson, R., Baxter, L. and Cissna, K. N. (eds.) Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies Sage, London, pp. 225-242. Tsoukas, H. (2009), "A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations", Organization Science, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 941-957. Tsutsumibayashi, K. (2005), "Fusion of horizons or confusion of horizons? Intercultural dialogue and its risks", Global Governance, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 103-114. Uhl-Bien, M. (2006), "Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing ", Leadership Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 654-676. Ventimiglia, G. (2008), "Martin Buber, God and psychoanalysis", Psychoanalytic Inquiry Special Issue: Transformation: Psychoanalysis and religion in dialogue, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 612-621. 41
Page 1 and 2: “Dialogue - possible between lead
Page 3 and 4: 2. Background It is difficult for m
Page 5 and 6: 3. Literature Review a. Dialogue Th
Page 7 and 8: Figure 1: the historical developmen
Page 9 and 10: Both sets of authors have in common
Page 11 and 12: academic work linking the two areas
Page 13 and 14: accessible to a pragmatic individua
Page 15 and 16: and Uhl-Bien, 1995) and charismatic
Page 17 and 18: many of their propositions are cert
Page 19 and 20: to leadership theory” (2008:253).
Page 21 and 22: i. Inhibitions to leader-follower d
Page 23 and 24: can easily grow into a feeling that
Page 25 and 26: Research questions, methodology and
Page 27 and 28: A methodology which has grown in us
Page 29 and 30: My experiences of co-operative inqu
Page 31 and 32: • The very ambiguous and uncertai
Page 33 and 34: • As the above points indicate, i
Page 35 and 36: Where next? The process of co-opera
Page 37 and 38: References Anderson, R., Baxter, L.
Page 39: Habermas, J. (1984), The theory of

“Dialogue – possible between leader and follower?” - Ashridge

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?