Shadow Economies and Corruption All Over the World - Index of - IZA

6 Appendix 1: Methods to Estimate the Size of the Shadow
Economy
As has already been mentioned in chapters 2 and 3 estimating the size and development of a
shadow economy is a difficult and challenging task. In this appendix I give a short but
comprehensive overview on the various procedures to estimate the size of a shadow economy.
Three different types of methods are most widely used, and each is briefly discussed as well
as critically evaluated.
6.1 Direct Approaches
6.1.1 Survey Method
These are micro approaches that employ either well designed surveys and samples based on
voluntary replies or tax auditing and other compliance methods. Sample surveys designed to
estimate the shadow economy are widely used in a number of countries 31) . The main
disadvantage of this method is that it presents the flaws of all surveys. For example, the
average precision and results depend greatly on the respondent’s willingness to cooperate, it is
difficult to asses the amount of undeclared work from a direct questionnaire, most
interviewers hesitate to confess a fraudulent behavior, and responses are of uncertain
reliability, which makes it difficult to calculate a real estimate (in monetary terms) of the
extend of undeclared work. The main advantage of this method lies in the detailed
information about the structure of the shadow economy, but the results from these kinds of
surveys are very sensitive to the way the questionnaire is formulated 32) .
In order to demonstrate the difficulties to calculate a macro estimation for a whole country
from survey results of shadow economy activities (from single individuals) the following
example is used. In Austria the author undertook a representative questioning of the Austrian
population in order to estimate the size of the shadow economy in the construction an
31) The direct method of voluntary sample surveys has been extensively used for Norway by Isachsen, Klovland
and Strom (1982), and Isachsen and Strom (1985). For Denmark this method is used by Mogensen et. al. (1995)
in which they report „estimates“ of the shadow economy of 2.7 percent of GDP for 1989, of 4.2 percent of GDP
for 1991, of 3.0 percent of GDP for 1993 and of 3.1 percent of GDP for 1994. In Pedersen (2003) estimates of
the Danish shadow economy contain the years 1995 with 3.1% up to 2001 with 3.8%.
32) The advantages and disadvantages of this method are extensively dealt by Pedersen (2003), Mogensen et. al
(1995) and Feld and Larsen (2005) in their excellent and very carefully done investigations. Compare also the
careful and detailed studies by Kazemier (2005a,b), who extensitively discusses the pros .and cons of this
method.
36