please click here for the pdf-version - RECYCLING magazin
please click here for the pdf-version - RECYCLING magazin
please click here for the pdf-version - RECYCLING magazin
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Editorial<br />
60,000 Highelium Low<br />
50,000<br />
40,000<br />
30,000<br />
20,000<br />
10,000<br />
0<br />
Aluminium<br />
Our <strong>for</strong>ecast <strong>for</strong> copper of US-Dollar 6000 is <strong>the</strong> lowest of<br />
<strong>the</strong> sample, of which <strong>the</strong> high is US-Dollar 7,800. This is<br />
from one of three analysts who believe <strong>the</strong> average price this<br />
year will be higher than in 2007. We can only assume that<br />
<strong>the</strong>se analysts take a more sanguine view about <strong>the</strong> global<br />
economy than most o<strong>the</strong>rs and/or <strong>the</strong>y expect production<br />
to once again fall short of expectations. In any event, <strong>the</strong><br />
consensus is that <strong>the</strong> copper price will average 5.1 per cent<br />
lower this year than in 2007. We think this optimistic on a<br />
Panglossian scale.<br />
Copperium<br />
Zincerium<br />
Leaderium<br />
Nickelium<br />
No one expects <strong>the</strong> zinc price to be higher this year, although<br />
<strong>the</strong> spread between <strong>the</strong> highest and lowest <strong>for</strong>ecast ties<br />
with lead as being <strong>the</strong> greatest at 38 per cent. However, <strong>the</strong><br />
highest <strong>for</strong>ecast of an average of US-Dollar 2,850, as well<br />
as a number of o<strong>the</strong>rs, suggests that prices are expected to<br />
rally strongly, given that <strong>the</strong> market is currently trading below<br />
US-Dollar 2,300. We think this extremely unlikely and our<br />
<strong>for</strong>ecast of US-Dollar 2,200 is <strong>the</strong> lower end of expectations.<br />
The consensus is that lead prices will fall on average by just<br />
3 per cent this year to US-Dollar 2,511. Again we think this<br />
is optimistic and are <strong>for</strong>ecasting US-Dollar 2,200. As noted,<br />
t<strong>here</strong> is a wide divergence of opinion – although having said<br />
that, <strong>the</strong> high <strong>for</strong>ecast of US-Dollar 3,300 is ra<strong>the</strong>r out on a<br />
limb as is <strong>the</strong> low of US-Dollar 2,050, with most <strong>for</strong>ecasts in<br />
Tinkelium<br />
High and low <strong>for</strong>ecasts 2008 base<br />
metals prices (US-Dollar/tonne).<br />
<strong>the</strong> US-Dollar 2,000-2,500 range. Four analysts believe <strong>the</strong><br />
average price will be higher this year than in 2007.<br />
The nickel price is expected to record a substantial fall this<br />
year, with <strong>the</strong> consensus pointing to a 25.5 per cent slump<br />
to US-Dollar 27,782. All analysts agree that <strong>the</strong> price will fall,<br />
although t<strong>here</strong> is a wide spread on <strong>the</strong> extent of <strong>the</strong> decline,<br />
with a high of US-Dollar 30,864 (14 US-Dollar/lb) and a<br />
low of US-Dollar 24,000 – which is our <strong>for</strong>ecast – compared<br />
with US-Dollar 37,275 last year. As <strong>for</strong> tin, most analysts<br />
expect <strong>the</strong> average price this year to be higher than in 2007<br />
and even those who do not are predicting prices at near historically<br />
high levels. Again, BaseMetals.com is near <strong>the</strong> bottom<br />
of <strong>the</strong> scale, with a <strong>for</strong>ecast of US-Dollar 13,000.<br />
Finally, we’ve made two observations:<br />
• Firstly, <strong>the</strong>se metals do not trade in a vacuum and <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
price movements are often dependent not only on <strong>the</strong> major<br />
contracts (particularly copper) and o<strong>the</strong>r commodities (such<br />
as oil and precious metals). Looking at <strong>the</strong> table of <strong>for</strong>ecasts,<br />
it appears that some analysts have failed to take this<br />
into account.<br />
• Moreover, most analysts seem to have a ra<strong>the</strong>r rose-tinted<br />
view of <strong>the</strong> global economic outlook and <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>ecasts generally<br />
portray that t<strong>here</strong> is a good deal of ‘fence sitting’ going<br />
on. Given how <strong>the</strong> markets have moved in <strong>the</strong> past couple of<br />
years this is entirely understandable, but only serves to confirm<br />
that <strong>for</strong>ecasting is a mug’s game. u<br />
23