Columbia River Project Water Use Plan - BC Hydro

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 4.2. BC Hydro station “Columbia River at Mica Dam Outflow”, 2003-2009 (heavy line). Mean flow for 1976-2009 (light line) is shown for comparison.
Figure 5.1. (a) WSC station 08ND011, “Columbia River above Steamboat Rapids”, 1955-1985 and WSC station 08ND025, “Revelstoke Project Outflow”, 1986-2009. (b) Mean pre-impoundment flow for the years indicated. (c) Mean post-impoundment flow for the years indicated. Mean (heavy line), maximum and minimum (medium lines) and mean ± one standard deviation (light lines).
Page 1: Columbia River Project Water Use Pl
Page 4 and 5: This is a progress report for a lon
Page 6 and 7: CLBMON-3 Kinbasket and Revelstoke R
Page 13 and 14: Hydrology of Kinbasket and Revelsto
Page 15 and 16: 1. Introduction The hydrology of Ki
Page 17 and 18: Local inflow to Kinbasket dominates
Page 19 and 20: exceptions: in late fall of 2003 th
Page 21 and 22: Results Daily flow data for the fou
Page 23 and 24: Acknowledgements We gratefully ackn
Page 25 and 26: Figure 1.2 Kinbasket Reservoir with
Page 27 and 28: Figure 3.1. (a) WSC station 08NB005
Page 29: Figure 4.1. (a) WSC station 08ND007
Page 33 and 34: Figure 6.1. (a) WSC station 08NB019
Page 35 and 36: Figure 6.3. (a) WSC station 08ND012
Page 37 and 38: Figure 6.5. Comparison of flows in
Page 39 and 40: Figure 7.1. (a) WSC station 08ND017
Page 41 and 42: Figure 8.1. (a) BC Hydro station
Page 43 and 44: Appendix 1 Gauging Stations in the
Page 45: CLBMON-3 Kinbasket and Revelstoke R
Page 48 and 49: Contents 1. Introduction...........
Page 50 and 51: drainage for Kinbasket Reservoir in
Page 52 and 53: 3. Results The tributary chemistry
Page 54 and 55: Survey of tributaries to Revelstoke
Page 56 and 57: Mica and Revelstoke was very low, <
Page 58 and 59: 6.80 7.30 Figure 1 pH of Tributarie
Page 60 and 61: 44.8 39.9 Figure 3 Nitrate and Nitr
Page 62 and 63: Figure 5 Total Phosphorus (μg/L) o
Page 64 and 65: 12 24 22 12 17 Figure 7 Conductivit
Page 66 and 67: Figure 9 Total Dissolved Phosphorus
Page 68 and 69: Flow (m 3 /s) T (°C) C25 (μS/cm)
Page 70 and 71: Flow (m 3 /s) T (°C) C25 (μS/cm)
Page 72 and 73: NN (μg/L) C25 (μS/cm) TP (μg/L)
Page 74 and 75: Flow (m 3 /s) C25 (μS/cm) NN (μS/
Page 76 and 77: References Appendix 1 Summary of Me
Page 78 and 79: Table A2-2 Tributaries to Revelstok
Page 82 and 83:
*Reference tributary, additional da
Page 84 and 85:
Table A3-5 Columbia River and refer
Page 86 and 87:
Table A3-6 Sampling location, water
Page 88 and 89:
Table A3-8 Water Quality For Beaver
Page 91 and 92:
CTD Surveys Kinbasket and Revelstok
Page 93 and 94:
List of Figures Figure A1 Map showi
Page 95 and 96:
Additional casts were also collecte
Page 97 and 98:
3. Results Before examining Kinbask
Page 99 and 100:
and Columbia Arm (K3co), with addit
Page 101 and 102:
The variation in the conductivity o
Page 103 and 104:
Figure A1 Map showning approximate
Page 105 and 106:
T (°C) C25 (μS/cm) T (°C) C25 (
Page 107 and 108:
km 10 5 0 −5 −10 −15 Kca1 K1f
Page 109 and 110:
km 10 5 0 −5 −10 −15 Kca1 K1f
Page 111 and 112:
km 10 5 0 −5 −10 −15 Kca1 K1f
Page 113 and 114:
km −3.8 −3.85 −3.9 −3.95
Page 115 and 116:
km −17.5 K3co K3co −18 K3co −
Page 117 and 118:
km 0.67 0.66 0.65 0.64 0.63 0.62 0.
Page 119 and 120:
depth (m) depth (m) depth (m) depth
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
km 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 R3up R2m
Page 127 and 128:
km 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 R3up R2.
Page 129 and 130:
km 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 R3up R2m
Page 131 and 132:
km 49 R2.1 48.5 48 47.5 47 46.5 46
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 (
Page 141 and 142:
Appendix 2 List of profiles No Date
Page 143 and 144:
Appendix 3 Additional Profiles Prof
Page 145:
CLBMON-3 Kinbasket and Revelstoke R
Page 148 and 149:
Reservoir Water Chemistry Kinbasket
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 173 and 174:
PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY IN KINBASKET A
Page 175 and 176:
Acknowledgements Thanks to Pierre B
Page 177 and 178:
Methods Field Sampling Primary prod
Page 179 and 180:
eadings at Kinbasket Forebay and at
Page 181 and 182:
Chlorophyll a (mg/m 2 ) 40 30 20 10
Page 183 and 184:
Primary Productivity (mg C/m 2 /d)
Page 185 and 186:
Discussion Given that primary produ
Page 187 and 188:
(2007) Report. Fisheries Project Re
Page 189 and 190:
KB 24 Aug 2009 2 0 0.67 0.14 0.98 K
Page 191 and 192:
RD 22 Sept 2009 20 2 0.07 0.02 0.11
Page 193:
Appendix B Integrated Chl a for Kin
Page 197 and 198:
PHYTOPLANKTON POPULATIONS IN KINBAS
Page 199 and 200:
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1.0 INTRO
Page 201 and 202:
Figure 17 Average abundance (Cells/
Page 203 and 204:
SECTION 2.0 METHODS 2.1 Sampling Pr
Page 205 and 206:
SECTION 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Study Limit
Page 207 and 208:
Table 2 Kinbasket Reservoir phytopl
Page 209 and 210:
Table 3 Revelstoke Reservoir phytop
Page 211 and 212:
contributors to phytoplankton abund
Page 213 and 214:
Figure 6 Average phytoplankton biov
Page 215 and 216:
Figure 7 Average phytoplankton abun
Page 217 and 218:
Figure 10 Average phytoplankton bio
Page 219 and 220:
Table 9 Average seasonal phytoplank
Page 221 and 222:
Figure 14 Kinbasket Reservoir month
Page 223 and 224:
Figure 17 Average abundance (Cells/
Page 225 and 226:
SECTION 4.0 DISCUSSION 4.1 Phytopla
Page 227:
REFERENCES Canter-Lund, H. and J.W.
Page 231 and 232:
Kinbasket and Revelstoke Reservoirs
Page 233 and 234:
Figure 13. Monthly average zooplank
Page 235 and 236:
1. Introduction This report summari
Page 237 and 238:
Table 2. Seasonal average zooplankt
Page 239 and 240:
The predominant copepod was D. bicu
Page 241 and 242:
14). Daphnia biomass was also relat
Page 243 and 244:
iomass, while in Kinbasket reservoi
Page 245 and 246:
Schindler, E.U., L. Vidmanic, D. Se
Page 247 and 248:
density (ind/L) density % 18 16 14
Page 249 and 250:
composition % composition % composi
Page 251 and 252:
iomass (�g/L) biomass (�g/L) bi
Page 253 and 254:
# of eggs per gravid female # of eg
Page 255 and 256:
density (#/L) 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 19
Page 257 and 258:
iomass (ug/L) biomass % 70 60 50 40
Page 259 and 260:
density (#/L) density (#/L) density
Page 261 and 262:
# of eggs per gravid female # of eg
Page 263 and 264:
density (ind/L) biomass (ug/L) 30 2
Page 265 and 266:
density (ind/L) biomass (ug/L) 30 2
show all

Columbia River Project Water Use Plan - BC Hydro

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?