16.01.2013 Views

GMSMON-17 WILLISTON RESERVOIR TRIBUTARY - BC Hydro

GMSMON-17 WILLISTON RESERVOIR TRIBUTARY - BC Hydro

GMSMON-17 WILLISTON RESERVOIR TRIBUTARY - BC Hydro

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.2 Study Area<br />

May 22, 2012<br />

Report No. 1114920016-R-Rev0-2000 6<br />

<strong>GMSMON</strong>-<strong>17</strong> <strong>WILLISTON</strong> <strong>RESERVOIR</strong> <strong>TRIBUTARY</strong> HABITAT<br />

REVIEW<br />

The 2011 sampling program focused on the lower reaches of each tributary where each creek flows into<br />

Williston Reservoir and upstream approximately 1.1 km, typically to where the nearest Forest Service Road<br />

crossed each creek. A summary map showing the location of each site (Map 1) and sampling plots (Maps 2 to 5)<br />

are provided in Appendix A and photos of the tributary mouths are shown in Appendix B.<br />

Descriptions of the Site’s biological environment are based on the Ecoregion system and Biogeoclimatic (BGC)<br />

Ecosystem Classification (BEC) system. The Ecoregion classification system provides a systematic review of<br />

the small-scale ecological relationships in the province; the Site is located in the Humid Temperate Ecodomain,<br />

Humid Continental Highlands Ecodivision, Sub-boreal Interior Ecoprovince, Omineca Mountains Ecoregion and<br />

Parsnip Trench Ecosection. The BEC system delineates the province into BGC zones based on topographic and<br />

climatic conditions that are reflected by the presence of specific plant and animal communities. Based on<br />

mapping provided on the iMap <strong>BC</strong> (Government of <strong>BC</strong> 2009), the Site occurs within the Williston Sub-Boreal<br />

Spruce moist cool biogeoclimatic unit (SBSmk2).<br />

2.0 METHODS<br />

2.1 Fish surveys<br />

2.1.1 Spawner surveys<br />

Stream walks were conducted for each study creek to enumerate the number of spawners and redds. One<br />

person walked up each stream bank starting at the outlet. All habitat types were assessed for fish presence and<br />

for evidence of spawning (i.e., cleared gravel patches). Effort was dependant on ease of access and habitat<br />

suitability. For example, where stream banks were difficult to traverse, surveyors would concentrate their effort to<br />

point features such as riffles and gravel substrate areas. Stream walks were conducted to target potential Arctic<br />

Grayling spawning at all four study creeks during the first field site visit (9 to 18 May, 2011) and on Six Mile and<br />

Lamonti creeks during the second site visit (6 to 8 June, 2011). The second visit was timed to target potential<br />

Rainbow Trout spawning. High flow conditions in the study streams during the second visit prevented stream<br />

walk surveys on Ole and Factor Ross creeks.<br />

The locations of suitable spawning substrates observed during the surveys were recorded using a GPS.<br />

Observations were made near the mouths of the study creeks to document any potential barriers to fish<br />

movement (i.e., debris jams or perched mouths).<br />

In addition to visual surveys for redds and spawners during stream walks, a number of other techniques were<br />

attempted to assess the suitability of these methods for detecting spawning activity in the study creeks. In<br />

reaches suitable for spawning, fly-fishing was used to attempt to capture spawning adults and kick-net sampling<br />

was used to sample gravels for eggs. Fly fishing was conducted in Lamonti and Six Mile creeks during the Arctic<br />

Grayling survey. Effort was concentrated on pools of adequate size that they might contain adult fish. A total of<br />

two to five minutes were spent angling with dry flies in each selected pool. Some snorkelling was also conducted<br />

to look for spawners and redds but efforts were limited because of high flow conditions. Only Six Mile Creek<br />

contained adequate habitat in which to conduct snorkel surveys during early spring but Lamonti Creek was also<br />

sampled. An average of five minutes were spent surveying each pool in Six Mile Creek while less time (average<br />

of two minutes) was spent in each Lamonti Creek pool due to the small pool sizes. Given the low success rate

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!