16.01.2013 Views

GMSMON-17 WILLISTON RESERVOIR TRIBUTARY - BC Hydro

GMSMON-17 WILLISTON RESERVOIR TRIBUTARY - BC Hydro

GMSMON-17 WILLISTON RESERVOIR TRIBUTARY - BC Hydro

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

May 22, 2012<br />

Report No. 1114920016-R-Rev0-2000 22<br />

<strong>GMSMON</strong>-<strong>17</strong> <strong>WILLISTON</strong> <strong>RESERVOIR</strong> <strong>TRIBUTARY</strong> HABITAT<br />

REVIEW<br />

current at several sites) and many potential sites were not feasible to sample because of practical or safety<br />

constraints. Access to sample sites with electrofishing and block net equipment (by boat and hiking) was also<br />

labour and time intensive, which limited the number of sites that could be sampled. For these reasons, we<br />

recommend that alternative methods be considered for the juvenile and small-bodied fish population survey<br />

component of this monitoring program.<br />

One suggested alternative is a mark-resight program to estimate juvenile fish abundance. Minnow traps would<br />

be used to capture juvenile and small fish, which would be marked with hook and yarn markers and released at<br />

the capture site. A night-time snorkel survey would be conducted to enumerate the number of marked and unmarked<br />

fish at the sample sites. Fluorescent lights can be used during snorkel surveys to help observe<br />

fluorescent dye VIE tags. A population estimate would be generated based on the number of marked and unmarked<br />

fish observed. Similar mark-resight programs have been used in other locations to estimate the<br />

abundance of small and juvenile fish in small streams (Bonneau, Thurow, and Scarnechhia, 1995) and for other<br />

<strong>BC</strong> <strong>Hydro</strong> studies (Decker, Mcnair and Lewis, 2010). Surveys would be conducted at index sites that would be<br />

re-sampled each study year. These methods offer several advantages over closed-cell electrofishing depletion<br />

surveys, including potentially more accurate population estimates (Decker, Mcnair and Lewis, 2010) and less<br />

time and effort for transporting and installing block nets.<br />

4.2 Amphibians<br />

Very few amphibians were observed or heard during the three sampling surveys. In addition, little off-channel<br />

habitat was present at any of the four streams. Most of the habitat that was observed turned out to be ephemeral<br />

in nature and may not have supported appropriate conditions for amphibian breeding or rearing. Suitable habitat<br />

is present within the zone of inundation (wet mud flats) at all the stream mouths, evidence of breeding observed<br />

in this area included long-toed salamander eggs at Six Mile Creek and numerous juvenile western toad at the<br />

mouth of Factor Ross.<br />

4.3 Birds<br />

As the abundance and diversity of migratory birds is invariably linked to numerous factors throughout their range,<br />

it is anticipated that linking changes in the diversity or abundance of birds in riparian areas to proposed<br />

enhancement works will be difficult and likely not possible. As such, it is recommended that songbird monitoring<br />

be suspended and that efforts be reallocated to fish monitoring where the designed enhancement is most likely<br />

to yield a change.<br />

4.4 Vegetation<br />

The key management question relating to the riparian vegetation section of the Tributary Habitat Review<br />

monitoring program is: does riparian vegetation along tributaries increase in abundance and diversity as a result<br />

of enhancement? The primary sampling objective of the riparian vegetation task is to address the management<br />

question posed above by collecting data necessary to draw inferences and to test the following null hypothesis:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!