Lets talk about sex.... - Auckland District Health Board

More documents

Recommendations

Info

22 Results Sexuality Two thirds of the total respondents identified as heterosexual. Just over a quarter identified as Rainbow, and a smaller group (6%) identified themselves as asexual or other (2%). Figure 1 Identity of non-heterosexuals Sexuality Percentages The Rainbow group (26%) represented a variety of sexual orientation identities. Figure 2 How non-heterosexual respondents identified their sexuality Note: Some have identified themselves as more than one    
Of the Rainbow group, one quarter identified their sexuality in more than one way. For example, one respondent ticked lesbian, queer and WSW (women who have sex with women). NB non-heterosexual was one of the options to select for sexual orientation. Whilst Trans participants are included within the Rainbow group, they may identify their sexual orientation as either heterosexual or non-heterosexual, or other. Figure 3 Gender identity Whilst there was the option to select more than one identity, most of the respondents identified as either male or female, with two identifying as other, and one respondent identifying as transgender. Figure 4 Number of ways Rainbow respondents identified their sexual orientation Gender identity     23
Page 1: ASEXUALBISEXUAL QUEERTAKATAAPUI FA
Page 5 and 6: Acknowledgements The project team i
Page 7 and 8: Glossary and Acronyms Asexual: A pe
Page 9 and 10: Trans/Transgender: The term transge
Page 11 and 12: 3. Key informant interviews with 47
Page 13 and 14: • An online/web/accessible direct
Page 15 and 16: Background Evidence from both inter
Page 17 and 18: Literature Review Review of interna
Page 19 and 20: • There is a clear policy and pro
Page 21: Methodology - Service User Anonymou
Page 25 and 26: The respondents who found the discu
Page 27 and 28: Further comments of interest One se
Page 29 and 30: Service Engagement: A large majorit
Page 31 and 32: Identity Participants were asked ho
Page 33 and 34: The 5 participants who reported fee
Page 35 and 36: “I was assumed to be straight eve
Page 37 and 38: Figure 16 Service usuers suggestion
Page 39 and 40: 3 of these 8 participants who self
Page 41 and 42: “No, not at XXX service. My ex-pa
Page 43 and 44: Recommendations for specific Rainbo
Page 45 and 46: Methodology and results - service p
Page 47 and 48: Figure 25 Most participants (73%) w
Page 49 and 50: “[There is] no specific tool or a
Page 51 and 52: Service providers experience and co
Page 53 and 54: Figure 32 Individual experience wor
Page 55 and 56: Access to effective and appropriate
Page 57 and 58: • Providing Rainbow related liter
Page 59 and 60: Figure 38 Individual NGO service pr
Page 61 and 62: Specific gaps and barriers Most par
Page 63 and 64: Barriers: Specific barriers for acc
Page 65 and 66: Issues identified by service provid
Page 67 and 68: “Variable levels of understanding
Page 69 and 70: • Half of the participants felt e
Page 71 and 72: iv. Discussion of sexuality or gend
Page 73:
Whilst there appears to be a slowly
Page 76 and 77:
76 Recommendations 1. Improve Rainb
Page 78 and 79:
78 References Associate Minister of
Page 80 and 81:
80 Human Rights Commission. (2008).
Page 82 and 83:
82 Appendices Appendix 1 Barbara, A
Page 84 and 85:
84 Clark, ME, Landers, S, Linde, R,
Page 86 and 87:
86 As noted above the first chapter
Page 88 and 89:
88 has produced some good practice
Page 90 and 91:
90 sexual minority people, terms an
Page 92 and 93:
92 Appendix 2 Key informant intervi
Page 94 and 95:
94 Appendix 3 Brief questionnaire f
Page 96 and 97:
96 If you answered yes, please rate
Page 99:
Many thanks to the service provider
show all

Lets talk about sex.... - Auckland District Health Board

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?