19.01.2013 Views

11 October 2012 - Canterbury City Council

11 October 2012 - Canterbury City Council

11 October 2012 - Canterbury City Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE <strong>11</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2012</strong><br />

conditions of consent, concerns about handling of asbestos and general<br />

dissatisfaction with the information submitted by the applicant in support<br />

of the proposal. These matters are discussed in detail in the body of this report.<br />

• The Director <strong>City</strong> Planning has recommended the application be approved<br />

subject to conditions.<br />

• The Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel has recommended the<br />

application be approved in accordance with the Director <strong>City</strong> Planning’s<br />

recommendation, subject to amendments.<br />

21 82 BELMORE ROAD RIVERWOOD: FITOUT AND CHANGE OF USE OF<br />

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING FOR VEHICLE BODY REPAIR WORKSHOP.<br />

• The proposal involves minor external works and the internal fit out and use of<br />

the existing industrial premises as a vehicle body repair station, and installation<br />

of one flush wall sign.<br />

• The application has been assessed against the relevant provisions of State<br />

Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007, the <strong>Canterbury</strong> Planning<br />

Scheme Ordinance, Draft <strong>Canterbury</strong> Local Environmental Plan <strong>2012</strong> and<br />

other codes and policy controls. The proposal is consistent with these<br />

requirements.<br />

• The application was notified in accordance with the requirements of our<br />

Notification Policy (DCP 32). One petition comprising a total of 86 signatures<br />

was received in objection to the proposal. Matters of concern related primarily<br />

to the proposed hours of operation, noise generation, disturbance and operation<br />

of deliveries.<br />

• The Director <strong>City</strong> Planning has recommended the application be approved<br />

subject to conditions.<br />

• The Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel has recommended the<br />

application be approved in accordance with the Director <strong>City</strong> Planning’s<br />

recommendation, subject to amendments.<br />

Page 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!