11 October 2012 - Canterbury City Council

CITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE 11 OCTOBER 2012
6 13-15 ANGLO ROAD, CAMPSIE: DEMOLITION AND
CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED RETAIL/RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT WITH BASEMENT CARPARKING
FILE NO: 31/13D PT3
REPORT BY: DIRECTOR CITY PLANNING
WARD: CENTRAL
D/A No: DA-622/2011
Applicant:
Owner:
D-Studio Architects Pty Ltd
Greenland Development Pty Ltd
Zoning: General Business 3(a) under Local Environmental Plan No. 148 –
Campsie Precinct
Application Date: 21 December 2011; with additional information submitted on 23
December 2011, 18 January 2012, 22 March 2012, 5 April 2012, 18
May 2012 and 21 June 2012
Summary:
• The Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel on 30 July 2012 deferred making a
recommendation on the application (see Supplementary Information).
• The applicant seeks consent to demolish the existing structures and construct a five
storey mixed commercial and residential development containing a two level basement
car park, three ground floor commercial tenancies and twenty eight residential units.
• The proposed development is permissible with Council consent within the General
Business 3(a) zone under Local Environmental Plan 148 – Campsie Precinct.
• The application was notified/advertised in accordance with our Notification Policy -
Development Control Plan 32. One submission was received raising concerns in
relation to the construction phase of the development and deficiency of carparking for
the retail component of the development. These issues have been addressed and are
discussed in greater detail in the body of this report.
• The proposed development generally complies with all requirements of the relevant
planning instruments and development control plans, with the exception of the deep
soil planting area control and building height. The proposed development is consistent
with and reflects the objectives of the zone and the performance criteria established
under Development Control Plan 54 – Town Centres.
• The Director City Planning has recommended the application be approved subject to
conditions.
• The Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel has recommended the application be
approved in accordance with the Director City Planning’s recommendation, subject to
amendments.
Page 43