25.09.2012 Views

CEE in 2020 – Trends and perspectives for the next ... - Roland Berger

CEE in 2020 – Trends and perspectives for the next ... - Roland Berger

CEE in 2020 – Trends and perspectives for the next ... - Roland Berger

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CEE</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>2020</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>Trends</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>perspectives</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>next</strong> decade<br />

Study Vienna, November 2010<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

1


Contents Page<br />

A.<br />

B.<br />

C.<br />

D.<br />

E.<br />

Study setup 3<br />

Ten assumptions <strong>for</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> through <strong>2020</strong> 6<br />

Summary 41<br />

Appendix <strong>–</strong> Country analysis 43<br />

Appendix <strong>–</strong> Study authors 51<br />

© 2010 Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> Strategy Consultants<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

2


A<br />

Study setup<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

3


<strong>CEE</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>2020</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>Trends</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>perspectives</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>next</strong><br />

decade<br />

Introductory remarks<br />

> In September 2010, Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> Strategy Consultants conducted an onl<strong>in</strong>e survey among<br />

320 senior managers <strong>in</strong> Central <strong>and</strong> Eastern Europe (<strong>CEE</strong>) about <strong>the</strong> future of this region<br />

from a management perspective<br />

> For <strong>the</strong> qualitative part, <strong>the</strong> survey's results have been discussed with lead<strong>in</strong>g economists,<br />

analysts <strong>and</strong> CEOs. For <strong>the</strong> quantitative part, desktop research <strong>and</strong> analyses based on<br />

publically available figures were conducted<br />

> The objective of <strong>the</strong> study was to identify <strong>the</strong> development prospects <strong>for</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>next</strong><br />

decade<br />

> Topics covered <strong>in</strong>cluded general assessments, corporate strategies, overall economic<br />

challenges <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> effects of global trends on Central <strong>and</strong> Eastern Europe<br />

> Selected results of this survey were compared with <strong>the</strong> outcome of <strong>the</strong> previous study<br />

"<strong>CEE</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2016", which was conducted <strong>in</strong> 2006<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

4


<strong>CEE</strong>-wide participation of around 320 managers <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>-depth analysis of six selected <strong>CEE</strong> countries<br />

Participation structure [%]<br />

<strong>CEE</strong> COUNTRIES PARTICIPATING INDUSTRIES<br />

Countries with <strong>in</strong>-depth analysis<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study<br />

Automotive<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Transportation<br />

Bank<strong>in</strong>g &<br />

Public sector<br />

2%<br />

<strong>in</strong>surance<br />

Pharma & healthcare 3% 3%<br />

Metals & m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

4% 2% 2%<br />

26%<br />

Chemicals & oil<br />

5%<br />

Energy & utilities 6%<br />

Construction 9%<br />

IT/media/telecom<br />

11%<br />

13%<br />

14%<br />

Services<br />

Consumer goods & retail<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

5


B<br />

Ten assumptions <strong>for</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> through <strong>2020</strong><br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

6


Quo vadis <strong>CEE</strong>? <strong>–</strong>The region has to re<strong>in</strong>vent itself as a<br />

European growth region of global significance<br />

Ten assumptions <strong>for</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> through <strong>2020</strong> (1/2)<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

<strong>CEE</strong> <strong>in</strong> its current <strong>for</strong>m will not exist any more <strong>–</strong> Europe will consist of EU <strong>and</strong><br />

non-EU countries, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> region will be much more diverse<br />

The region will not be among <strong>the</strong> global emerg<strong>in</strong>g markets but will rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong><br />

European growth region. GDP growth will plateau at about 2% above WE level<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> countries cont<strong>in</strong>ue to develop from "workbenches" to <strong>in</strong>novation-driven<br />

economies, <strong>the</strong> gap between Western Europe <strong>and</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> will persist<br />

Lack of basic requirements (<strong>in</strong>stitutions, <strong>in</strong>frastructure) will rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>CEE</strong>'s ma<strong>in</strong> weakness,<br />

whereas efficiency enhancement is a competitive advantage<br />

Human capital issues (demographic development, bra<strong>in</strong> dra<strong>in</strong>, education) will rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

second bottleneck <strong>for</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r economic development<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

7


Quo vadis <strong>CEE</strong>? <strong>–</strong>The region has to re<strong>in</strong>vent itself as a<br />

European growth region of global significance<br />

Ten assumptions <strong>for</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> through <strong>2020</strong> (2/2)<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

In <strong>2020</strong>, <strong>CEE</strong> will still be dependent on Western Europe <strong>–</strong> Pan-<strong>CEE</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess is develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

fast <strong>and</strong> may become a potential way out<br />

Its unique position as a bridgehead between <strong>the</strong> emerg<strong>in</strong>g markets of Russia, Turkey, Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> advanced economies of Western Europe is <strong>CEE</strong>'s future capital<br />

Counteract<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> scarcity of energy & raw materials, <strong>the</strong> consolidation of public f<strong>in</strong>ances<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> consequences of technological progress are <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> tasks <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>next</strong> decade<br />

The regional growth <strong>in</strong>dustries will be energy & utilities, IT & telecom <strong>and</strong> pharma &<br />

healthcare <strong>–</strong> Shift toward future <strong>in</strong>dustries needed<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> future growth drivers are thought to be energy-related (energy efficiency,<br />

renewables) <strong>and</strong> IT solutions<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

8


1<br />

EUROPE <strong>–</strong> IN THE EU OR NOT<br />

The def<strong>in</strong>ition of <strong>the</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> region with<strong>in</strong> Europe will change<br />

substantially by <strong>2020</strong> <strong>–</strong> One region, but very diverse<br />

EU: Economic development from 2010 to <strong>2020</strong>, GDP per capita (EU-27 = 100) [%]<br />

EUROPE AS IT IS TODAY EUROPE <strong>2020</strong> <strong>–</strong> IN THE EU OR NOT<br />

EU: 27 countries<br />

Euro: 16 countries<br />

EU-15 New EU member states<br />

EU <strong>in</strong>tegration<br />

New EU<br />

members<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong>; International Monetary Fund (IMF) <strong>–</strong> World Economic Outlook 2015; data <strong>for</strong> <strong>2020</strong> extrapolated<br />

€<br />

area growth<br />

EU: >30 countries<br />

151%<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

9


1 EUROPE <strong>–</strong> IN THE EU OR NOT<br />

The diverse economic development with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> region is<br />

push<strong>in</strong>g toward divid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>in</strong>to subregions<br />

Survey results<br />

COUNTRY<br />

TREND TOWARD SUBREGIONS<br />

Austria<br />

79%<br />

Ukra<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Croatia<br />

<strong>CEE</strong> average<br />

Romania<br />

Czech Republic<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong> 42%<br />

Do you see a trend emerg<strong>in</strong>g that is creat<strong>in</strong>g subregions such as CE, SEE, Baltics, CIS?<br />

Yes/no<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study<br />

51%<br />

62%<br />

60%<br />

57%<br />

67%<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> Central Europe (CE) consists of <strong>the</strong> Czech<br />

Republic, Slovakia <strong>and</strong> Hungary. Some- Sometimes<br />

Austria, Slovenia <strong>and</strong> Croatia are<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded<br />

> Sou<strong>the</strong>astern Europe (SEE) consists<br />

of Serbia, Bosnia <strong>and</strong> Herzegov<strong>in</strong>a,<br />

Montenegro, Macedonia, Bulgaria <strong>and</strong><br />

Albania. Sometimes Croatia,<br />

Romania <strong>and</strong> Slovenia are <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />

> The CIS region consists of Russia,<br />

Ukra<strong>in</strong>e, Kazakhstan, Belarus <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>for</strong>mer Soviet Republics<br />

> Larger countries such as Pol<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

Romania will be addressed separately<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

10


2 <strong>CEE</strong> AS A GROWTH REGION<br />

Due to <strong>the</strong> economic crisis, <strong>CEE</strong> lost its position as a global<br />

growth eng<strong>in</strong>e <strong>–</strong> Structural weaknesses became obvious<br />

GDP development [2000 ≙ 100%]<br />

100<br />

00<br />

01<br />

02<br />

03<br />

Economic crisis<br />

04<br />

05<br />

06<br />

07<br />

08<br />

09<br />

10<br />

11<br />

487%<br />

BRIC 1)<br />

1) Overall growth rate of BRA, RUS, IND, CHN<br />

2) Overall growth rate of BIH, BGR, HRV, CZE, EST, HUN, LVA, LTU, MKD, MNE, POL, ROU, SRB, SVK, SVN, UKR<br />

3) Overall growth rate of AUT, BEL, DNK, FIN, FRA, DEU, GRC, IRL, ITA, LUX, NLD, NOR, PRT, ESP, SWE, CHE, GBR<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong>; International Monetary Fund (IMF)<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> first decade of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>CEE</strong>2) 378% <strong>CEE</strong> new century, <strong>CEE</strong> has been<br />

2)<br />

378% new century, <strong>CEE</strong> has been<br />

200%<br />

12<br />

WE 3)<br />

one of <strong>the</strong> global growth regions<br />

> Growth was driven <strong>in</strong> particular by<br />

FDIs from WE, but concealed<br />

unsolved structural problems<br />

> <strong>CEE</strong>'s ma<strong>in</strong> problems are<br />

<strong>–</strong> Institutional weaknesses<br />

<strong>–</strong> Inadequate <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

<strong>–</strong> Lack of <strong>in</strong>novation<br />

> The absence of FDI dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

crisis revealed <strong>the</strong>se issues<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

11


2 <strong>CEE</strong> AS A GROWTH REGION<br />

<strong>CEE</strong> will not rega<strong>in</strong> its status as a global growth eng<strong>in</strong>e <strong>–</strong><br />

The region is stuck <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> middle <strong>and</strong> has to redef<strong>in</strong>e itself<br />

Survey results<br />

REGION/<br />

COUNTRY<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

India<br />

Turkey<br />

Russia<br />

<strong>CEE</strong><br />

South America<br />

Africa & Middle East<br />

EU-15<br />

North America<br />

EXPECTED DEVELOPMENT<br />

-1 0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

-5 0<br />

5<br />

How will <strong>the</strong> economic situation develop <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g regions from 2010 to <strong>2020</strong>?<br />

-5… deteriorate / 0… rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same / +5… improve<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.9<br />

2.0<br />

1.8<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study; International Monetary Fund (IMF)<br />

3.0<br />

2.9<br />

Growth<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>es<br />

Grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

economies<br />

GDP GROWTH 2010-2015,<br />

AVERAGE ANNUAL CHANGE [%]<br />

9.7<br />

8.4<br />

4.5<br />

Moderate<br />

Growth Ch<strong>in</strong>a India Turkey RUS <strong>CEE</strong> North EU-15<br />

America<br />

4.2<br />

3.8<br />

2.6<br />

1.8<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

12


2 <strong>CEE</strong> AS A GROWTH REGION<br />

Polish managers are <strong>the</strong> most optimistic about <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

country's development <strong>–</strong> Croatian managers skeptical<br />

Survey results<br />

<strong>CEE</strong> COUNTRY<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong><br />

Czech Republic<br />

Romania<br />

<strong>CEE</strong> average<br />

Ukra<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Austria<br />

Croatia<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study<br />

EXPECTED DEVELOPMENT<br />

-1 0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

-5 0 5<br />

How will <strong>the</strong> economic situation <strong>in</strong> your country develop from 2010 to <strong>2020</strong>?<br />

-5… deteriorate / 0… rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same / +5… improve<br />

0.8<br />

0.8<br />

1.4<br />

1.3<br />

1.7<br />

2.2<br />

1.4<br />

n.a.<br />

2.0<br />

2.0<br />

2.2<br />

2.5<br />

2.5<br />

2010 2006<br />

Optimists<br />

Pessimists<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> Polish, Czech <strong>and</strong> Romanian<br />

managers are optimistic about<br />

<strong>the</strong> upcom<strong>in</strong>g decade<br />

> Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian, Austrian <strong>and</strong> Croatian<br />

managers expect only slow growth<br />

> Optimism has decl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

wake of <strong>the</strong> economic crisis<br />

> Whereas Polish managers are<br />

more optimistic than four years<br />

ago, Croatian managers have<br />

changed from be<strong>in</strong>g very<br />

optimistic to be<strong>in</strong>g pessimistic<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

13


2 <strong>CEE</strong> AS A GROWTH REGION<br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess volume <strong>in</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> will <strong>in</strong>crease over <strong>the</strong> <strong>next</strong> decade <strong>–</strong><br />

The number of workplaces will only grow slowly on average<br />

Survey results<br />

BUSINESS VOLUME NUMBER OF WORKPLACES<br />

Romania<br />

Ukra<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong><br />

Czech Republic<br />

<strong>CEE</strong> average<br />

Croatia<br />

Austria<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study<br />

-1<br />

-5<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4<br />

5<br />

0.5<br />

1.0<br />

1.7<br />

1.6<br />

2.3<br />

2.3<br />

2.1<br />

In which way will your <strong>in</strong>dustry develop <strong>in</strong> your country <strong>in</strong> terms of…<br />

-5… strongly decrease / 0… <strong>the</strong> same / +5… strongly <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

Ukra<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Romania<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>CEE</strong> average<br />

Croatia<br />

Czech Republic<br />

Austria<br />

-1 0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

-5 0 5<br />

0.4<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

-0.5<br />

0.6<br />

1.0<br />

1.3<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

14


3 THE GAP WILL REMAIN<br />

Whereas CE countries need to succeed <strong>in</strong> transit<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

advanced economies, SEE has to compete with BRIC states<br />

Economic development <strong>in</strong> 2010<br />

Economic development<br />

Factordriven<br />

UKR<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong>, World Economic Forum (WEF)<br />

SRB<br />

CZE<br />

SVK<br />

POLHUN<br />

HRV<br />

RUS<br />

ROU<br />

BGR<br />

SVN<br />

1 Transition 1-2 2 Transition 2-3 3<br />

Efficiencydriven<br />

AUT<br />

Innovationdriven<br />

t<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> Slovenia <strong>and</strong> Czech Republic<br />

have completed <strong>the</strong>ir transition to<br />

advanced economies<br />

> By <strong>2020</strong>, Slovakia <strong>and</strong> Hungary<br />

have a good chance to complete<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir transition. Pol<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

Croatia will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to catch up<br />

> Russia, Romania, Bulgaria <strong>and</strong><br />

Serbia will compete on a global<br />

level with Brazil, Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>and</strong> Turkey<br />

> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e has to establish itself as<br />

an attractive workbench <strong>for</strong><br />

Western companies<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

15


3 THE GAP WILL REMAIN<br />

Although <strong>CEE</strong> will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to catch up <strong>the</strong> gap will persist<br />

<strong>–</strong> Attractive opportunities <strong>for</strong> consumer products<br />

GDP based on purchas<strong>in</strong>g power parity (PPP) per capita (EU-15 = 100) [%]<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

00<br />

01<br />

02<br />

03<br />

04<br />

05<br />

06<br />

07<br />

08<br />

09<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong>; International Monetary Fund (IMF)<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

Austria<br />

EU-15 = 100<br />

Slovenia<br />

Czech Republic<br />

Slovakia<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong><br />

Hungary<br />

Russia<br />

Croatia<br />

Bulgaria<br />

Romania<br />

Serbia<br />

Ukra<strong>in</strong>e<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> In 2000, Slovenia (64%), <strong>the</strong><br />

Czech Republic (55%) <strong>and</strong><br />

Hungary (44%) were <strong>the</strong> most<br />

developed <strong>CEE</strong> countries<br />

> Today, Slovenia reaches 79%<br />

of Western European average,<br />

followed by <strong>the</strong> Czech Republic<br />

(72%) <strong>and</strong> Slovakia (58%)<br />

> In ten years, Slovenia will reach<br />

more than 80% of <strong>the</strong> EU-15<br />

average. Czech Republic<br />

(>75%) <strong>and</strong> Slovakia (>70%)<br />

will follow<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

16


4 INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS<br />

Compared to 2006, <strong>CEE</strong> countries are los<strong>in</strong>g significantly on<br />

competitiveness <strong>–</strong> Only Pol<strong>and</strong> is improv<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>uously<br />

International competitiveness: Global Competitiveness Report (2004-2010) 1) [rank]<br />

2004 2006 2010 Change 2004-2010<br />

AUT<br />

SVN<br />

HUN<br />

CZE<br />

SVK<br />

BGR<br />

POL<br />

HRV<br />

ROU<br />

RUS<br />

UKR<br />

SRB<br />

17<br />

33<br />

39<br />

40<br />

43<br />

59<br />

60<br />

61<br />

63<br />

70<br />

86<br />

89<br />

AUT<br />

CZE<br />

SVN<br />

SVK<br />

HUN<br />

POL<br />

HRV<br />

RUS<br />

ROU<br />

BGR<br />

UKR<br />

SRB<br />

17<br />

29<br />

1) The Global Competitiveness Report has only existed <strong>in</strong> this <strong>for</strong>m s<strong>in</strong>ce 2004<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong>; World Economic Forum (WEF)<br />

33<br />

37<br />

41<br />

48<br />

51<br />

62<br />

68<br />

72<br />

78<br />

87<br />

AUT<br />

CZE<br />

POL<br />

SVN<br />

HUN<br />

SVK<br />

RUS<br />

ROU<br />

BGR<br />

HRV<br />

UKR<br />

SRB<br />

18<br />

36<br />

39<br />

45<br />

52<br />

60<br />

63<br />

67<br />

71<br />

77<br />

89<br />

96<br />

AUT<br />

CZE<br />

POL<br />

SVN<br />

HUN<br />

SVK<br />

RUS<br />

ROU<br />

BGR<br />

HRV<br />

UKR<br />

SRB<br />

-1<br />

+3<br />

+21<br />

-12<br />

-13<br />

-17<br />

+7<br />

-4<br />

-12<br />

-16<br />

-3<br />

-7<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

17


4 BACK UP<br />

Efficiency drivers are <strong>the</strong> region's competitive advantage,<br />

but basic requirements will rema<strong>in</strong> weak<br />

International competitiveness: Global Competitiveness Report 2010-2011<br />

COUNTRY<br />

Austria<br />

Czech Rep.<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong><br />

Slovenia<br />

Hungary<br />

Slovakia<br />

Russia<br />

Romania<br />

Croatia<br />

Ukra<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Serbia<br />

OVERALL<br />

RANK<br />

18<br />

36<br />

39<br />

45<br />

52<br />

60<br />

63<br />

67<br />

77<br />

89<br />

96<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong>; World Economic Forum (WEF)<br />

Key <strong>for</strong> factor-driven<br />

economies<br />

BASIC<br />

REQUIREMENTS<br />

15<br />

44<br />

56<br />

34<br />

59<br />

53<br />

65<br />

77<br />

50<br />

102<br />

93<br />

> Institutions<br />

> Infrastructure<br />

> Macroeconomic stability<br />

> Health <strong>and</strong> primary education<br />

Key <strong>for</strong> efficiency-driven<br />

economies<br />

EFFICIENCY<br />

ENHANCERS<br />

19<br />

28<br />

30<br />

46<br />

41<br />

37<br />

53<br />

54<br />

76<br />

72<br />

93<br />

> Higher education <strong>and</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

> Goods market efficiency<br />

> Labor market efficiency<br />

> F<strong>in</strong>ancial market sophistication<br />

> Technological read<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

> Market size<br />

Key <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>novation-driven<br />

economies<br />

INNOVATION AND<br />

SOPHISTICATION<br />

13<br />

30<br />

50<br />

35<br />

51<br />

63<br />

80<br />

91<br />

85<br />

88<br />

107<br />

> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess sophistication<br />

> Innovation<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

18


4 BASIC REQUIREMENTS<br />

Major challenges will rema<strong>in</strong> bureaucracy, corruption <strong>and</strong><br />

legal uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty as well as <strong>the</strong> lack of <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

Survey results, Global Competitiveness Report 2010-2011<br />

FACTOR<br />

Geographical position<br />

Cultural similarity to Western countries<br />

Higher education <strong>and</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Primary education<br />

Language skills<br />

Work<strong>for</strong>ce resources<br />

Political <strong>and</strong> social stability<br />

Labor costs<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Innovation, R&D<br />

Fiscal framework<br />

Legal framework<br />

Corruption<br />

Bureaucracy<br />

DISADVANTAGE/ADVANTAGE<br />

-5 0 5<br />

-2.1<br />

-0.4<br />

-0.5<br />

-1.8<br />

2.8<br />

2.1<br />

1.8<br />

1.7<br />

1.3<br />

1.1<br />

0.6<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

Compared to o<strong>the</strong>r countries, what are <strong>the</strong> advantages/disadvantages of your country regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />

long-term <strong>in</strong>vestments? -5… strong disadvantage/ 0… <strong>the</strong> same / +5… strong advantage<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study; World Economic Forum (WEF)<br />

Basic requirements<br />

BASIC REQUIREMENTS WEF<br />

AUT<br />

CZE<br />

HRV<br />

POL<br />

ROU<br />

UKR<br />

INSTI- INFRA-<br />

# (out of 139) TUTIONS STRUCTURE<br />

15<br />

44<br />

50<br />

56<br />

77<br />

102<br />

15<br />

72<br />

86<br />

54<br />

81<br />

134<br />

20<br />

39<br />

41<br />

72<br />

92<br />

68<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

19


4 EFFICIENCY<br />

In <strong>the</strong> medium term, <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> advantage of <strong>CEE</strong> will still be<br />

its competitive labor costs<br />

Unit labor costs <strong>in</strong> % of EU-15, 2009 [%] <strong>–</strong> "Erste Group" analysis<br />

Slovakia<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong><br />

Hungary<br />

Croatia<br />

Bulgaria<br />

Czech Republic<br />

Romania<br />

Austria<br />

Slovenia<br />

Source: Eurostat; Erste Group<br />

70<br />

74<br />

80<br />

81<br />

81<br />

84<br />

94<br />

102<br />

103<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> Unit labor costs put<br />

productivity <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />

compensation<br />

> The <strong>CEE</strong> average with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

EU is about 83% of <strong>the</strong> EU-15<br />

average<br />

> Especially Slovakia, Pol<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> Hungary will rema<strong>in</strong><br />

attractive production locations<br />

> Countries like Austria <strong>and</strong><br />

Slovenia have to score with<br />

<strong>in</strong>novation <strong>and</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

sophistication<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

20


4 EFFICIENCY<br />

Efficiency improvement <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>novation will be on top of<br />

managers' agendas dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>next</strong> decade<br />

Survey results<br />

GENERAL STRATEGY<br />

Efficiency improvement<br />

Innovation<br />

Enhancement of cost structures<br />

Increase <strong>in</strong> service share<br />

Br<strong>and</strong> differentiation<br />

Enter<strong>in</strong>g new markets<br />

Penetrat<strong>in</strong>g new customer segments<br />

Consolidat<strong>in</strong>g supplier structures<br />

Location shifts<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study<br />

RELEVANCE FOR <strong>CEE</strong><br />

-1 0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

-5 0 5<br />

2.5<br />

2010 2006<br />

n.a.<br />

Which general strategies will shape your <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> your country dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>next</strong> ten years?<br />

-5… much less / 0… <strong>the</strong> same / +5… much more<br />

1.8<br />

1.5<br />

1.5<br />

1.4<br />

1.4<br />

1.4<br />

0.9<br />

1.9<br />

1.4<br />

2.1<br />

2.4<br />

2.5<br />

n.a.<br />

2.5<br />

2.3<br />

2.8<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> Efficiency improvement is at<br />

<strong>the</strong> top of <strong>the</strong> agenda <strong>in</strong><br />

all countries surveyed<br />

> In <strong>the</strong> advanced economies<br />

(AUT, CZE, HRV), <strong>in</strong>novation<br />

is thought to be more important<br />

than <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>CEE</strong> countries<br />

> Compared to 2006, costrelated<br />

topics became more<br />

important than <strong>in</strong>novationdriven<br />

topics<br />

> Location shifts are not on <strong>the</strong><br />

agenda of <strong>CEE</strong> managers<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

21


4 EFFICIENCY/INNOVATION<br />

A clear focus on high tech offers <strong>the</strong> best possibilities <strong>for</strong><br />

productivity ga<strong>in</strong>s <strong>–</strong> Hungary <strong>and</strong> Czech Republic lead<br />

Share of high-tech exports <strong>in</strong> 2009 [% of total exports] <strong>–</strong> "Erste Group" analysis<br />

0-5%<br />

5-8%<br />

8-15%<br />

15-18%<br />

18-59%<br />

Source: Eurostat; Erste Group<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> A clear focus on high tech<br />

offers <strong>the</strong> best possibilities <strong>for</strong><br />

high productivity ga<strong>in</strong>s <strong>and</strong><br />

boosts development toward<br />

<strong>in</strong>novative-driven economies<br />

> Hungary <strong>and</strong> Czech Republic<br />

are already overtak<strong>in</strong>g Western<br />

European competitors<br />

> Pol<strong>and</strong>, Romania <strong>and</strong> Bulgaria<br />

are lagg<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

22


4 INNOVATION<br />

A structural problem of <strong>the</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> countries is that R&D<br />

spend<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be far below Western European levels<br />

Innovation <strong>–</strong> Research & development <strong>in</strong> 2006 1) [% of GDP]<br />

AUT 2.45<br />

SVN 1.59<br />

CZE 1.54<br />

RUS 1.18<br />

HUN 1.00<br />

<strong>CEE</strong> average 0.87<br />

HRV 0.80<br />

POL 0.60<br />

SLK 0.49<br />

BUL 0.47<br />

ROM 0.45<br />

SRB n.a.<br />

UKR n.a.<br />

1) Latest available data, published 2008<br />

Source: WEF; Eurostat; Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong><br />

excl. AUT <strong>and</strong> RUS<br />

3% EU target<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> The Europe <strong>2020</strong> strategy<br />

recommends that 3% of <strong>the</strong> EU's<br />

GDP should be <strong>in</strong>vested <strong>in</strong> R&D<br />

> In 2008, only F<strong>in</strong>l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Sweden<br />

achieved this goal<br />

> Austria, Germany & Denmark are<br />

on <strong>the</strong>ir way to meet<strong>in</strong>g this target<br />

> Only Slovenia, Czech Republic<br />

<strong>and</strong> Hungary have R&D spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

over 1%<br />

> Although R&D spend<strong>in</strong>g is go<strong>in</strong>g<br />

up, all o<strong>the</strong>r countries are lagg<strong>in</strong>g<br />

far beh<strong>in</strong>d<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

23


5 HUMAN CAPITAL<br />

Human capital will rema<strong>in</strong> a major bottleneck <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> region's<br />

economic development<br />

A grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> a shr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Europe <strong>–</strong> Projected change: 2008-2030 [%]<br />

More than -10%<br />

-10 to -5%<br />

-5 to -2%<br />

-2 to 0%<br />

0 to +2%<br />

+2 to +5%<br />

+5 to +10%<br />

More than +10%<br />

Source: Eurostat; UN; EIU; Erste Group<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> Demographic development, an ongo<strong>in</strong>g<br />

bra<strong>in</strong> dra<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> "at best" average education<br />

systems are limit<strong>in</strong>g factors<br />

> The population will decl<strong>in</strong>e by 2030 <strong>in</strong> all<br />

<strong>CEE</strong> countries<br />

> Economic growth will be generated<br />

through productivity ga<strong>in</strong>s<br />

> Austria profits from migration from<br />

Germany, Central Europe <strong>and</strong><br />

Sou<strong>the</strong>astern Europe<br />

> Shr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g populations will be a<br />

phenomenon of rural areas, regional <strong>and</strong><br />

urban centers will grow or stagnate<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

24


5 HUMAN CAPITAL<br />

A decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g population <strong>in</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> will be compensated <strong>for</strong> by<br />

additional productivity <strong>–</strong> Wealth is spread<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Economic growth: GDP vs. GDP per capita <strong>–</strong> "Erste Group" analysis<br />

ECONOMIC GROWTH UP THROUGH <strong>2020</strong><br />

AUT<br />

-8%<br />

HRV<br />

<strong>2020</strong> GDP growth<br />

Source: EIU; Erste Group<br />

0%<br />

+3%<br />

CZE<br />

+5%<br />

HUN<br />

<strong>2020</strong> growth <strong>in</strong> GDP per capita<br />

+7%<br />

ROU<br />

+9%<br />

RUS<br />

0%<br />

SVK<br />

+14%<br />

UKR<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> Economic growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> will<br />

be generated also through<br />

productivity ga<strong>in</strong>s<br />

> The effect is that GDP per<br />

capita will grow stronger than<br />

GDP. The wealth of <strong>the</strong><br />

population will rise more<br />

quickly than GDP<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

25


5 HUMAN CAPITAL<br />

The ongo<strong>in</strong>g bra<strong>in</strong> dra<strong>in</strong> to Western Europe <strong>and</strong> North America<br />

will rema<strong>in</strong> a limit<strong>in</strong>g factor <strong>for</strong> economic development<br />

World Economic Forum, Bra<strong>in</strong> Dra<strong>in</strong> Index 2010-2011<br />

COUNTRY<br />

Austria<br />

Slovenia<br />

Czech Republic<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong><br />

Russia<br />

Hungary<br />

Slovakia<br />

Ukra<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Croatia<br />

Bulgaria<br />

Serbia<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study; World Economic Forum (WEF)<br />

BRAIN DRAIN RANK (out of 139)<br />

30<br />

48<br />

61<br />

79<br />

82<br />

99<br />

101<br />

115<br />

122<br />

127<br />

136<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> Especially <strong>in</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>astern<br />

Europe, <strong>the</strong> bra<strong>in</strong> dra<strong>in</strong> to<br />

Western Europe <strong>and</strong> North<br />

America is a serious problem<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> country's fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

development<br />

> In Central Europe, Austria is<br />

<strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> target of pan-<strong>CEE</strong><br />

migration <strong>–</strong> Austria is <strong>the</strong> only<br />

country <strong>in</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> with a grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

population<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

26


5 HUMAN CAPITAL<br />

Education currently seen as a competitive advantage <strong>–</strong><br />

Good school systems but universities need to improve<br />

Survey results<br />

FACTOR<br />

Geographical position<br />

Cultural similarity to Western countries<br />

Higher education <strong>and</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Primary education<br />

Language skills<br />

Work<strong>for</strong>ce resources<br />

Political <strong>and</strong> social stability<br />

Labor costs<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Innovation, R&D<br />

Fiscal framework<br />

Legal framework<br />

Corruption<br />

Bureaucracy<br />

DISADVANTAGE/<br />

ADVANTAGE<br />

-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

-1.8<br />

-2.1<br />

-0.4<br />

-0.5<br />

Compared to o<strong>the</strong>r countries, what are <strong>the</strong> advantages/disadvantages of your country regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />

long-term <strong>in</strong>vestments? -5… strong disadvantage / 0… average / +5… strong advantage<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study; PISA study 2006; QS world university rank<strong>in</strong>g 2010<br />

2.8<br />

2.1<br />

1.8<br />

1.7<br />

1.3<br />

1.1<br />

0.6<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

RANKINGS<br />

> In QS world university rank<strong>in</strong>g<br />

2010, <strong>CEE</strong> countries did not<br />

achieve any top results <strong>–</strong> Only<br />

AUT <strong>and</strong> CZE have<br />

universities <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> top 300<br />

> In <strong>the</strong> latest PISA rank<strong>in</strong>g, CZE<br />

is number 10, followed by<br />

Austria (12), Hungary (15),<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong> (17) <strong>and</strong> Slovakia (22)<br />

<strong>–</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>CEE</strong> countries did not<br />

participate<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

27


5 HUMAN CAPITAL<br />

The dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> soft skills will <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>–</strong> Language skills are<br />

on top of <strong>the</strong> agenda<br />

Survey results<br />

REQUIREMENT<br />

Language skills<br />

Personal development<br />

Complexity h<strong>and</strong>l<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Project management<br />

Creativity<br />

Commercial <strong>and</strong><br />

market<strong>in</strong>g abilities<br />

Sales abilities<br />

Technical abilities<br />

Corporate mgmt. abilities<br />

Intercultural abilities<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study<br />

2.6<br />

2.6<br />

2.6<br />

2.5<br />

2.4<br />

2.3<br />

2.2<br />

2.1<br />

2.0<br />

1.9<br />

LANGUAGE SKILLS<br />

English<br />

Russian<br />

German<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />

Spanish<br />

French<br />

-5… strongly decreas<strong>in</strong>g /0 … same level /+5 … strongly <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

3.1<br />

1.7<br />

1.5<br />

1.2<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> Good language skills <strong>–</strong><br />

especially German <strong>and</strong><br />

Russian <strong>–</strong> are an advantage<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> countries<br />

> English is develop<strong>in</strong>g from a<br />

<strong>for</strong>eign language to a valuable<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess tool<br />

> Nearly all countries <strong>–</strong> with <strong>the</strong><br />

exception of Austria <strong>–</strong> neglect<br />

<strong>in</strong>tercultural abilities<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

28


6 PAN-<strong>CEE</strong> BUSINESS<br />

<strong>CEE</strong> will depend predom<strong>in</strong>antly on Western Europe <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

upcom<strong>in</strong>g decade as well <strong>–</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a may be a "bl<strong>in</strong>d spot"<br />

Survey results<br />

North America<br />

1.81<br />

South America<br />

0.62<br />

4.01<br />

EU-151) EU-151) 3.29<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>2) <strong>CEE</strong><br />

1.45<br />

Turkey<br />

Russia 2.85<br />

India<br />

1.42<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> Managers view EU-15<br />

countries as <strong>the</strong>ir ma<strong>in</strong><br />

trade partners <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>vestors<br />

1) EU-15: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, F<strong>in</strong>l<strong>and</strong>, France, Germany, Greece, Irel<strong>and</strong>, Italy, Luxembourg, <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s, Portugal, Spa<strong>in</strong>, Sweden <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> United K<strong>in</strong>gdom 2) Excl. Russia<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

2.17<br />

How strong will <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence of <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g regions be on <strong>the</strong> economic development of <strong>the</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> region?<br />

0… no <strong>in</strong>fluence /5… strong <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

> Pan-<strong>CEE</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess will ga<strong>in</strong><br />

importance over <strong>the</strong> <strong>next</strong><br />

decade<br />

> Russia <strong>and</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a will play<br />

a significant role<br />

> Turkey is not perceived as<br />

overly important<br />

29


6 PAN-<strong>CEE</strong> BUSINESS<br />

But <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g pan-<strong>CEE</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess will reduce <strong>the</strong> dependance<br />

on Western Europe <strong>–</strong> Grow<strong>in</strong>g shares of imports<br />

Imports from <strong>CEE</strong> countries <strong>in</strong> 2009 [%]<br />

22<br />

60<br />

29<br />

17<br />

10<br />

61<br />

Source: Eurostat; Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong><br />

31<br />

28<br />

10<br />

15<br />

53<br />

62<br />

20<br />

25<br />

51<br />

42<br />

29<br />

33<br />

41<br />

27<br />

25<br />

39<br />

23<br />

36<br />

54<br />

40<br />

19<br />

37<br />

Avg.<br />

2005<br />

Avg.<br />

2009<br />

Imports from new EU-12 ("<strong>CEE</strong>") Imports from old EU-15 Imports from o<strong>the</strong>r countries<br />

16<br />

44<br />

17<br />

21<br />

28<br />

29<br />

52<br />

50<br />

+26%<br />

-4%<br />

+2%<br />

[%]<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> S<strong>in</strong>ce 2005, <strong>the</strong> share of<br />

imports from o<strong>the</strong>r new EU<br />

member countries <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong><br />

most <strong>CEE</strong> countries by 26%<br />

> The share of imports from<br />

EU-15 decreased by 4%, but<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>s high<br />

> In six countries, <strong>the</strong> share of<br />

imports from o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>CEE</strong><br />

countries is still below 20%,<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g huge potential <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

future<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

30


6 PAN-<strong>CEE</strong> BUSINESS<br />

The share of exports to o<strong>the</strong>r new EU member countries is<br />

still less than 20%, provid<strong>in</strong>g huge potential <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> future<br />

Exports to <strong>CEE</strong> countries <strong>in</strong> 2009 [%]<br />

15<br />

65<br />

31<br />

20<br />

16<br />

54<br />

31<br />

17<br />

52<br />

32<br />

32<br />

36 26<br />

Exports to new EU-12 ("<strong>CEE</strong>") Exports to old EU-15 Exports from o<strong>the</strong>r countries<br />

Source: Eurostat; Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong><br />

21<br />

21<br />

59<br />

15<br />

64<br />

20<br />

14<br />

56<br />

30<br />

26<br />

38<br />

14<br />

60<br />

36<br />

35<br />

14<br />

51<br />

Avg.<br />

2005<br />

Avg.<br />

2009<br />

18<br />

21<br />

25<br />

26<br />

53<br />

57<br />

+16%<br />

-7%<br />

+6%<br />

[%]<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> In most <strong>CEE</strong> countries, <strong>the</strong><br />

share of exports to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

EU-12 states has <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

> In POL, CZE <strong>and</strong> SVK, <strong>the</strong><br />

distribution of exports did not<br />

change significantly<br />

> The share of exports to o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>CEE</strong> countries is still relatively<br />

low <strong>and</strong> provides potential <strong>for</strong><br />

more <strong>in</strong>tense trade relations<br />

between neighbor<strong>in</strong>g countries<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> region<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

31


7 <strong>CEE</strong> AS BRIDGEHEAD<br />

The geographical position between WE <strong>and</strong> Russia <strong>and</strong><br />

similarities to Western countries viewed as ma<strong>in</strong> advantages<br />

Survey results<br />

FACTOR<br />

Compared to o<strong>the</strong>r countries, what are <strong>the</strong> advantages/disadvantages of your country regard<strong>in</strong>g long-term <strong>in</strong>vestments?<br />

-5… strong disadvantage /0… average /+5… strong advantage<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study<br />

Geographical position<br />

Cultural similarity to Western countries<br />

Higher education <strong>and</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Primary education<br />

Language skills<br />

Work<strong>for</strong>ce resources<br />

Political <strong>and</strong> social stability<br />

Labor costs<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Innovation, R&D<br />

Fiscal framework<br />

Legal framework<br />

Corruption<br />

Bureaucracy<br />

DISADVANTAGE/<br />

ADVANTAGE<br />

-5 0 5<br />

-1.8<br />

-2.1<br />

-0.4<br />

-0.5<br />

2.8<br />

2.1<br />

1.8<br />

1.7<br />

1.3<br />

1.1<br />

0.6<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

32


7 <strong>CEE</strong> AS BRIDGEHEAD<br />

Russia has a major economic <strong>in</strong>fluence on <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>and</strong> will<br />

keep a strong role as <strong>in</strong>vestor<br />

Survey results<br />

RUSSIA'S INFLUENCE ON<br />

THE COUNTRIES<br />

Ukra<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Croatia<br />

Romania<br />

<strong>CEE</strong> average<br />

Austria<br />

Czech Rep.<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong><br />

-1 0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

-5 0 5<br />

0.5<br />

1.4<br />

1.3<br />

1.3<br />

1.3<br />

1.1<br />

Political<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study<br />

2.0<br />

1.3<br />

2.2<br />

2.1<br />

2.4<br />

2.1<br />

2.1<br />

2.1<br />

Economic<br />

RUSSIA'S INFLUENCE AS AN<br />

INVESTOR<br />

Croatia<br />

Ukra<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Czech Rep.<br />

<strong>CEE</strong> average<br />

Austria<br />

Romania<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong><br />

-1 0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

-5 0 5<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> Especially Croatian <strong>and</strong><br />

Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian managers expect<br />

stronger Russian <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

In your op<strong>in</strong>ion, how will <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence of Russia on <strong>CEE</strong> develop with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>next</strong> ten years?<br />

Russia's role <strong>in</strong> <strong>2020</strong> as an important <strong>in</strong>vestor <strong>in</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> will be… -5… less relevant /0… <strong>the</strong> same /+5… more relevant; multiple answers possible<br />

2.4<br />

2.2<br />

2.1<br />

2.0<br />

1.9<br />

1.8<br />

0.8<br />

> Polish managers are skeptical<br />

of Russia's emerg<strong>in</strong>g power<br />

> Except Ukra<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>CEE</strong><br />

managers expect only a small<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> Russian political<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

33


7 <strong>CEE</strong> AS BRIDGEHEAD<br />

Russian <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> Europe will concentrate on <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>–</strong><br />

Focus on resource-driven <strong>in</strong>dustries<br />

Survey results<br />

TARGET COUNTRY<br />

Ukra<strong>in</strong>e<br />

"New" EU members<br />

Belarus<br />

Serbia<br />

EU-15<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r SEE countries<br />

Turkey<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study<br />

30%<br />

21%<br />

34%<br />

46%<br />

45%<br />

65%<br />

61%<br />

TARGET INDUSTRY<br />

Energy & utilities<br />

Chemicals & oil<br />

Metals & m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Real estate<br />

Bank. & <strong>in</strong>surance<br />

Tourism<br />

IT/media/telecom<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Automotive<br />

Cons. goods & retail<br />

Pharma<br />

What will be <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> target countries/<strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>for</strong> Russian <strong>in</strong>vestments?<br />

-5… less relevant / 0… <strong>the</strong> same /+5… more relevant; multiple answers possible<br />

14%<br />

11%<br />

8%<br />

6%<br />

15%<br />

31%<br />

26%<br />

56%<br />

46%<br />

87%<br />

79%<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> EU<br />

members lead <strong>the</strong> rank<strong>in</strong>g<br />

> Belarus <strong>and</strong> Serbia, <strong>the</strong><br />

traditional target countries, are<br />

viewed as not that important<br />

> Russian <strong>in</strong>vestments ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

concentrate on resource <strong>and</strong><br />

energy-<strong>in</strong>tensive <strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>–</strong><br />

Diversification needed<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

34


8 TASKS FOR <strong>2020</strong><br />

Raw material shortage will have a major impact on <strong>the</strong><br />

region <strong>and</strong> will boost <strong>in</strong>novation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> energy sector<br />

Survey results<br />

TENDENCY<br />

IMPORTANCE ∆<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Raw materials/energy<br />

3.12<br />

Consolidation of public f<strong>in</strong>ances 2.78 2.97<br />

Technological progress<br />

2.91<br />

Capital markets <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

2.62 2.96<br />

Demographic development<br />

2.34 3.02<br />

Grow<strong>in</strong>g social imbalance<br />

2.18 2.76<br />

Migration & labor mobility<br />

2.17 2.69<br />

Grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fluence of <strong>the</strong> state<br />

2.14 2.26<br />

Change of values<br />

2.07 2.35<br />

Climate change<br />

1.76<br />

2.70<br />

Political conflicts/terrorism<br />

1.43<br />

2.63<br />

3.56<br />

0.44<br />

-0.19<br />

0.48<br />

0.34<br />

0.68<br />

0.58<br />

0.52<br />

0.12<br />

0.28<br />

0.94<br />

1.20<br />

Local Global<br />

Which of <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g lead<strong>in</strong>g tendencies will <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>the</strong> global <strong>and</strong> local economy with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>next</strong> ten years?<br />

0… no importance / 5… high importance<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study<br />

3.39<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> Raw material shortage<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> dependency on<br />

fossil fuels are on top of<br />

<strong>the</strong> agenda<br />

> The consolidation of<br />

public f<strong>in</strong>ances has only<br />

regional importance<br />

> Demographic development<br />

<strong>and</strong> climate<br />

change are only<br />

important on a global<br />

level <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> managers<br />

underestimate <strong>the</strong><br />

relevance <strong>for</strong> <strong>CEE</strong><br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

35


8 TASKS FOR <strong>2020</strong><br />

Renewable energy is viewed as <strong>the</strong> primary task <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>next</strong><br />

decade <strong>–</strong> Investment boost needed to reach EU targets<br />

Europe <strong>2020</strong> target <strong>–</strong> RES 1) as share of energy supply [%]<br />

34.0<br />

23.3<br />

13.0<br />

6.1<br />

25.0<br />

16.0<br />

2005 <strong>2020</strong> target<br />

1) RES = Renewable Energy Sources<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong>; Eurostat<br />

7.2 15.0<br />

4.3<br />

6.8<br />

13.0<br />

14.0<br />

24.0<br />

17.8<br />

9.4<br />

16.0<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> The "20/20/20" climate/energy targets<br />

should be met <strong>–</strong> <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

to 30% <strong>in</strong> emissions reductions if <strong>the</strong><br />

conditions are right<br />

> Goal of EU is to realize a "Resourceefficient<br />

Europe" to help decouple<br />

economic growth from <strong>the</strong> use of<br />

resources, support <strong>the</strong> shift toward a<br />

low-carbon economy, <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong><br />

use of renewable energy sources,<br />

modernize <strong>the</strong> transport sector <strong>and</strong><br />

promote energy efficiency<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

36


8 TASKS FOR <strong>2020</strong><br />

<strong>CEE</strong> managers view <strong>the</strong> consolidation of public f<strong>in</strong>ances as<br />

very important <strong>–</strong> Debt rates below WE, but grow<strong>in</strong>g quickly<br />

General government debt 1) , 2009 [% of GDP]<br />

Change<br />

2008-<br />

2009 [%]<br />

Country<br />

rat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

S&P<br />

+5.1 +6.6 +6.0 +2.0 +8.4 +6.8 +9.3 -5.7 +9.9 +3.9 +0.7 +0.1<br />

78.0<br />

69.3<br />

46.8<br />

46.5<br />

37.1<br />

34.1<br />

31.8<br />

31.3<br />

30.0<br />

24.0<br />

14.8<br />

HUN AUT HRV POL SVK CZE SVN SRB UKR ROU BGR RUS<br />

BBB<br />

neg.<br />

AAA<br />

stable<br />

BBB<br />

neg.<br />

Source: Eurostat; CIA World Factbook; Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong><br />

A<br />

stable<br />

A+<br />

stable<br />

A<br />

pos.<br />

AA<br />

stable<br />

BB<br />

stable<br />

B+<br />

stable<br />

BB+<br />

stable<br />

BBB<br />

stable<br />

1) The general government sector comprises central government, state government, local governments <strong>and</strong> social security funds<br />

6.3<br />

BBB<br />

stable<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> With <strong>the</strong> exception of<br />

Hungary, government<br />

debt rates are much less<br />

than those of <strong>the</strong> EU-15<br />

> Governmental debt saw<br />

relatively moderate<br />

growth of 4.2% <strong>in</strong> 2009 <strong>–</strong><br />

But <strong>in</strong> some countries,<br />

deficits are grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

much faster<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

37


9 GROWTH INDUSTRIES<br />

Regional growth <strong>in</strong>dustries are energy & utilities, IT & telecom<br />

<strong>and</strong> pharma & healthcare <strong>–</strong> Implementation?<br />

Survey results<br />

INDUSTRY<br />

Energy & utilities<br />

IT & telecom<br />

Pharma & healthcare<br />

Consumer goods & retail<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Bank<strong>in</strong>g & <strong>in</strong>surance<br />

Construction<br />

Public sector<br />

Automotive<br />

Oil & gas<br />

Chemicals<br />

Metals & m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study<br />

DEVELOPMENT<br />

-5 0 5<br />

-0.3<br />

How relevant will <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries be <strong>for</strong> your country?<br />

5… lose importance / 0… rema<strong>in</strong> on same level / +5… ga<strong>in</strong> importance<br />

2.2<br />

2.0<br />

1.9<br />

1.8<br />

1.5<br />

1.4<br />

1.1<br />

0.6<br />

0.6<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> Current focus on automotive,<br />

metals & m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> chemicals<br />

> <strong>CEE</strong> also successful <strong>in</strong><br />

mach<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>and</strong> food<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

> Future <strong>in</strong>dustries play only<br />

a m<strong>in</strong>or role<br />

> Shift toward future<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries needed<br />

!<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

38


9 GROWTH INDUSTRIES<br />

The service sector will see a boom <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>next</strong> decade <strong>–</strong><br />

More <strong>and</strong> more mature economies push development<br />

Survey results<br />

COUNTRY<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong><br />

Czech Republic<br />

Austria<br />

<strong>CEE</strong> average<br />

Croatia<br />

Ukra<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Romania<br />

EXPECTED DEVELOPMENT<br />

Shift toward<br />

Shift toward<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries -1 4 services<br />

In <strong>the</strong> <strong>next</strong> decade, will <strong>the</strong>re be a tendency <strong>in</strong> your country toward <strong>in</strong>dustries or services?<br />

-5… strong shift to <strong>in</strong>dustries / 0… rema<strong>in</strong> on same level / +5… strong shift to services<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study<br />

1.3<br />

1.3<br />

1.6<br />

1.5<br />

1.9<br />

1.8<br />

2.1<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> Over <strong>the</strong> <strong>next</strong> ten years, <strong>CEE</strong><br />

will not experience "re- "re<strong>in</strong>dustrialization"<br />

> Pol<strong>and</strong>, Czech Republic <strong>and</strong><br />

Austria will face a strong shift<br />

toward services with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>next</strong><br />

decade<br />

> Croatia, Ukra<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> Romania<br />

will see only a moderate shift<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

39


10 FUTURE BUSINESS BRANCHES<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> future growth drivers are viewed as be<strong>in</strong>g energy<br />

related topics (energy efficiency, renewables) <strong>and</strong> IT solutions<br />

Survey results<br />

<strong>CEE</strong><br />

Energy efficient construction<br />

Renewable energies<br />

IT solutions<br />

Susta<strong>in</strong>able tourism<br />

Secondary healthcare market<br />

Biotechnology<br />

Organic <strong>and</strong> ethical products<br />

E-mobility<br />

RELEVANCE<br />

How relevant will <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g future topics be <strong>for</strong> your country?<br />

0… not relevant /5… extremely relevant<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study<br />

Not<br />

Extremely<br />

0relevant relevant5<br />

1.9<br />

2.2<br />

2.2<br />

2.5<br />

2.8<br />

2.7<br />

3.0<br />

3.0<br />

COMMENTS<br />

> Energy-related branches will<br />

be <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> future <strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>–</strong><br />

Energy-efficient construction<br />

<strong>and</strong> renewables are top 3 <strong>in</strong><br />

every country<br />

> IT solutions lead <strong>the</strong> rank<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

Pol<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> are<br />

ranked No. 2 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Czech<br />

Republic<br />

> E-mobility <strong>and</strong> organic<br />

products are not viewed as<br />

important future bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

models<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

40


C Summary<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

41


Summ<strong>in</strong>g up <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>–</strong> The <strong>CEE</strong> region has chosen its<br />

path <strong>and</strong> to pick up speed considerably<br />

Conclusions<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

<strong>CEE</strong> has to redef<strong>in</strong>e itself <strong>–</strong> Austria's <strong>and</strong> Russia's roles as gatekeepers are chang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Companies must consider <strong>the</strong> EU as one home market with 500 m <strong>in</strong>habitants. Additionally,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y should put a focus on pan-<strong>CEE</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess based on self-susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess models<br />

Governments will have to (f<strong>in</strong>ally) do <strong>the</strong>ir homework: streng<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>stitutions (less<br />

bureaucracy, corruption), develop<strong>in</strong>g public services (health system, educational system, social<br />

& pension system) <strong>and</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

<strong>CEE</strong> should not copy bad budget behavior of Western Europe<br />

The importance of global growth markets <strong>and</strong> growth <strong>in</strong>dustries has not yet been<br />

adequately recognized as such so far. Companies will need to redesign <strong>the</strong>ir bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

models <strong>and</strong> footpr<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>for</strong> a globalized world<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

42


D<br />

Appendix <strong>–</strong> Country analysis<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

43


A SPECIAL LOOK AT AUSTRIA<br />

Austria has to redef<strong>in</strong>e its role as a gatekeeper to Eastern<br />

Europe<br />

Austria<br />

COUNTRY FACTS<br />

> Population (millions) 8.4<br />

> GDP/capita (USD) 45,989<br />

> Unemployment rate 4.8%<br />

> GDP composition<br />

<strong>–</strong> Agriculture 1.5%<br />

<strong>–</strong> Industry 29.8%<br />

<strong>–</strong> Services 68.7%<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> study; CIA World Factbook, WEF GCR 2010<br />

MANAGER ASSESSMENT<br />

Above <strong>CEE</strong> average Below <strong>CEE</strong> average<br />

> Political <strong>and</strong> social<br />

stability<br />

> Legal framework<br />

> Infrastructure<br />

> Geographical position<br />

> Cultural similarity to<br />

Western countries<br />

> Primary education<br />

> Corruption<br />

> Higher education <strong>and</strong><br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

> Fiscal framework<br />

> Innovation, R&D<br />

> Language skills<br />

> Work<strong>for</strong>ce resources<br />

> Bureaucracy<br />

> Labor costs<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

> Due to <strong>the</strong> economic crisis,<br />

Austria has lost <strong>the</strong> benefit of<br />

<strong>the</strong> boom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>CEE</strong> region<br />

> Austria's economy will see only<br />

moderate economic development<br />

<strong>–</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess volume will stagnate<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> number of jobs will decl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

> Especially <strong>the</strong> stable markets of<br />

Central Europe will be <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong><br />

markets until <strong>2020</strong><br />

> The ag<strong>in</strong>g society will be <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong><br />

challenge over <strong>the</strong> <strong>next</strong> decade<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

44


A SPECIAL LOOK AT CROATIA<br />

Croatia has to start structural re<strong>for</strong>ms immediately <strong>and</strong><br />

position itself as a hub <strong>for</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>astern Europe<br />

Croatia<br />

COUNTRY FACTS<br />

> Population (millions) 4.4<br />

> GDP/capita (USD) 14,243<br />

> Unemployment rate 16.1%<br />

> GDP composition<br />

<strong>–</strong> Agriculture 6.3%<br />

<strong>–</strong> Industry 28.1%<br />

<strong>–</strong> Services 65.6%<br />

MANAGER ASSESSMENT<br />

Above <strong>CEE</strong> average Below <strong>CEE</strong> average<br />

> Geographical position<br />

> Cultural similarity to<br />

Western countries<br />

> Infrastructure<br />

> Primary education<br />

> Higher education <strong>and</strong><br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

> Language skills<br />

> Political <strong>and</strong> social<br />

stability<br />

> Innovation, R&D<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> Study; CIA World Factbook, WEF GCR 2010<br />

> Work<strong>for</strong>ce resources<br />

> Fiscal framework<br />

> Labor costs<br />

> Legal framework<br />

> Bureaucracy<br />

> Corruption<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

> Croatia switched from <strong>the</strong> most<br />

optimistic to most pessimistic <strong>–</strong><br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess volume <strong>and</strong> jobs will<br />

grow slowly from a low basis<br />

> The consolidation of public<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ances will be on top of <strong>the</strong><br />

agenda, grow<strong>in</strong>g social imbalance<br />

is ranked No. 4<br />

> Croatian managers expect more<br />

Russian <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>and</strong> a<br />

stagnat<strong>in</strong>g EU<br />

> Ma<strong>in</strong> future <strong>in</strong>dustry will be<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>able tourism<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

45


A SPECIAL LOOK AT THE CZECH REPUBLIC<br />

The Czech Republic is on <strong>the</strong> way towards an advanced<br />

economy with a focus on high tech<br />

Czech Republic<br />

COUNTRY FACTS<br />

> Population (millions) 10.4<br />

> GDP/capita (USD) 18,557<br />

> Unemployment rate 8.1%<br />

> GDP composition<br />

<strong>–</strong> Agriculture 2.3%<br />

<strong>–</strong> Industry 37.2%<br />

<strong>–</strong> Services 60.5%<br />

MANAGER ASSESSMENT<br />

Above <strong>CEE</strong> average Below <strong>CEE</strong> average<br />

> Geographical position<br />

> Cultural similarity to<br />

Western countries<br />

> Higher education <strong>and</strong><br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

> Political <strong>and</strong> social<br />

stability<br />

> Primary education<br />

> Labor costs<br />

> Work<strong>for</strong>ce resources<br />

> Fiscal/legal framework<br />

> Innovation, R&D<br />

> Infrastructure<br />

> Language skills<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> Study; CIA World Factbook, WEF GCR 2010<br />

> Bureaucracy<br />

> Corruption<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

> Czech managers are optimistic<br />

about <strong>the</strong> <strong>next</strong> ten years <strong>–</strong><br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess volume will <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

but <strong>the</strong> number of jobs will<br />

stagnate<br />

> Tech. progress viewed as <strong>the</strong><br />

ma<strong>in</strong> trend over <strong>the</strong> <strong>next</strong> decade<br />

> Czech Republic will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to<br />

establish itself as a high-tech<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess location<br />

> Institutional re<strong>for</strong>ms needed <strong>–</strong><br />

Corruption <strong>and</strong> bureaucracy are<br />

<strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> hurdles <strong>for</strong> development<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

46


A SPECIAL LOOK AT POLAND<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong> will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to catch up <strong>–</strong> Infrastructure <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions will rema<strong>in</strong> weaknesses<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong><br />

COUNTRY FACTS<br />

> Population (millions) 38.1<br />

> GDP/capita (USD) 11,288<br />

> Unemployment rate 8.9%<br />

> GDP composition<br />

<strong>–</strong> Agriculture 4.6%<br />

<strong>–</strong> Industry 28.1%<br />

<strong>–</strong> Services 67.3%<br />

MANAGER ASSESSMENT<br />

Above <strong>CEE</strong> average Below <strong>CEE</strong> average<br />

> Higher education <strong>and</strong><br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

> Cultural similarity to<br />

Western countries<br />

> Geographical position<br />

> Work<strong>for</strong>ce resources<br />

> Primary education<br />

> Language skills<br />

> Labor costs<br />

> Political <strong>and</strong> social<br />

stability<br />

> Innovation, R&D<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> Study; CIA World Factbook, WEF GCR 2010<br />

> Legal framework<br />

> Corruption<br />

> Infrastructure<br />

> Fiscal framework<br />

> Bureaucracy<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

> Pol<strong>and</strong> will cont<strong>in</strong>ue its catch-up<br />

process <strong>–</strong> On <strong>the</strong> one h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>the</strong><br />

country will rema<strong>in</strong> an attractive<br />

workbench, but on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, it will<br />

face a strong shift toward services<br />

> Higher education <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> market<br />

size are Pol<strong>and</strong>'s ma<strong>in</strong><br />

advantages<br />

> Infrastructure <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions as<br />

well as tax regulations are a<br />

disadvantage <strong>–</strong> Re<strong>for</strong>ms needed<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

47


A SPECIAL LOOK AT ROMANIA<br />

Romania faces a challeng<strong>in</strong>g decade <strong>–</strong> Attractiveness as a<br />

workbench decl<strong>in</strong>es, capital market represents a hurdle<br />

Romania<br />

COUNTRY FACTS<br />

> Population (millions) 21.3<br />

> GDP/capita (USD) 7,542<br />

> Unemployment rate 7.8%<br />

> GDP composition<br />

<strong>–</strong> Agriculture 12.4%<br />

<strong>–</strong> Industry 35.0%<br />

<strong>–</strong> Services 52.6%<br />

MANAGER ASSESSMENT<br />

Above <strong>CEE</strong> average Below <strong>CEE</strong> average<br />

> Language skills<br />

> Labor costs<br />

> Geographical position<br />

> Cultural similarity to<br />

Western countries<br />

> Work<strong>for</strong>ce resources<br />

> Higher education <strong>and</strong><br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

> Primary education<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> Study; CIA World Factbook, WEF GCR 2010<br />

> Innovation, R&D<br />

> Fiscal framework<br />

> Political <strong>and</strong> social<br />

stability<br />

> Legal framework<br />

> Bureaucracy<br />

> Corruption<br />

> Infrastructure<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

> Romanian managers are most<br />

optimistic about bus<strong>in</strong>ess volume<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> number of jobs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

country; <strong>the</strong>y believe <strong>in</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> as<br />

one management region<br />

> But high unit labor costs (94% of<br />

WE average) are a disadvantage<br />

as a production location<br />

> Capital markets are an important<br />

topic <strong>–</strong> Access to f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>the</strong><br />

ma<strong>in</strong> problem <strong>for</strong> companies<br />

> Lack of <strong>in</strong>frastructure <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

48


A SPECIAL LOOK AT UKRAINE<br />

Ukra<strong>in</strong>e will stabilize on a low level <strong>and</strong> has <strong>the</strong> chance to<br />

develop <strong>in</strong>to a bridgehead between <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>and</strong> Russia<br />

Ukra<strong>in</strong>e<br />

COUNTRY FACTS<br />

> Population (millions) 45.7<br />

> GDP/capita (USD) 2,542<br />

> Unemployment rate 8.8%<br />

> GDP composition<br />

<strong>–</strong> Agriculture 9.8%<br />

<strong>–</strong> Industry 30.7%<br />

<strong>–</strong> Services 59.5%<br />

MANAGER ASSESSMENT<br />

Above <strong>CEE</strong> average Below <strong>CEE</strong> average<br />

> Geographical position<br />

> Labor costs<br />

> Work<strong>for</strong>ce resources<br />

> Higher education <strong>and</strong><br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

> Primary education<br />

> Language skills<br />

> Cultural similarity to<br />

Western countries<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>CEE</strong> <strong>2020</strong> Study; CIA World Factbook, WEF GCR 2010<br />

> Innovation, R&D<br />

> Infrastructure<br />

> Political <strong>and</strong> social<br />

stability<br />

> Fiscal framework<br />

> Legal framework<br />

> Bureaucracy<br />

> Corruption<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

> Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian managers are slightly<br />

optimistic <strong>–</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess volume <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> number of jobs will rise<br />

> Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian managers are most<br />

skeptical about <strong>the</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

development of <strong>CEE</strong> as one<br />

management region <strong>and</strong> expect<br />

a strong shift toward subregions<br />

(CIS)<br />

> Political <strong>in</strong>stability, corruption,<br />

bureaucracy <strong>and</strong> access to<br />

f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g are considered to be<br />

<strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> disadvantages<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

49


E<br />

Appendix <strong>–</strong> Study authors<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

50


About <strong>the</strong> authors<br />

DR. VLADIMIR<br />

PREVEDEN<br />

> Partner <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Vienna Office<br />

<strong>and</strong> Manag<strong>in</strong>g Partner <strong>for</strong><br />

Sou<strong>the</strong>astern Europe<br />

MATTHIAS<br />

STURM<br />

Contact: office_vienna@rol<strong>and</strong>berger.com; Freyung 3/2/10, 1010 Vienna, Austria<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong><br />

> Market<strong>in</strong>g Coord<strong>in</strong>ator <strong>for</strong> <strong>CEE</strong>,<br />

based <strong>in</strong> Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong>'s<br />

Vienna office<br />

MARLENA<br />

KOPPENDORFER<br />

> Global Market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

51


It's character that creates<br />

impact!<br />

<strong>CEE</strong>_<strong>in</strong>_<strong>2020</strong>_Study.pptx<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!