SUPREME COURT & HIGHCOURT Rulings on POLICE
SUPREME COURT & HIGHCOURT Rulings on POLICE
SUPREME COURT & HIGHCOURT Rulings on POLICE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Facts<br />
Held<br />
1.2 : F.I.R. AND REGISTRATION OF F.I.R.<br />
Ramsinh Bavaji Jadeja vs State of Gujarat*<br />
The injured body of victim was brought to hospital by his brother, eye-witness. The<br />
Head C<strong>on</strong>stable <strong>on</strong> duty at hospital informs PSI <strong>on</strong> teleph<strong>on</strong>e about fight and dead body<br />
of having been brought to hospital. Having received the teleph<strong>on</strong>ic message, the Police<br />
Sub Inspector immediately reached the hospital and he first recorded the statement of<br />
brother of deceased. He sent the said statement to the city police stati<strong>on</strong>, for registering<br />
a case. Thereafter he held the inquest <strong>on</strong> the dead body of the deceased for postmortem;<br />
prepared the injury report in respect of the injuries <strong>on</strong> the pers<strong>on</strong> of brother of<br />
deceased and sent him for medical examinati<strong>on</strong> and treatment. Then he went to the<br />
scene of occurrence and collected blood-stained crust of cement plaster and examined<br />
witnesses. Under the circumstances menti<strong>on</strong>ed above the statement of brother of<br />
deceased, which was recorded by the. Investigating Officer, afteueaching the hospital<br />
should be treated as the First Informatiol1 Report and not the cryptic teleph<strong>on</strong>ic<br />
message of Head C<strong>on</strong>stable.<br />
Every teleph<strong>on</strong>ic informati<strong>on</strong> about commissi<strong>on</strong> of a cognizable offence irrespective of<br />
nature and details of such informati<strong>on</strong> cannot be treated as FIR.<br />
*1994 Cr.L.J. 3067