29.01.2013 Views

Phinda Private Game Reserve - The African Safari Lodge Foundation

Phinda Private Game Reserve - The African Safari Lodge Foundation

Phinda Private Game Reserve - The African Safari Lodge Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Phinda</strong> <strong>Private</strong><br />

<strong>Game</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong><br />

KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa<br />

1


Structure of case study<br />

• Overview of the initiative<br />

• Policy context<br />

• Planning and development issues:<br />

– Enterprise model and land tenure<br />

– Institutional arrangements<br />

• Tourism products and activities<br />

• Impacts of tourism<br />

– Environmental impacts and conservation<br />

– Social impacts, including training and skills development and<br />

stakeholders<br />

– Economic impacts, including value chain analysis, capital structure<br />

and commercial issues<br />

• Current issues and replicability<br />

2


Overview of the initiative<br />

• 7 luxury lodges operated by CCAfrica group on<br />

rehabilitated land in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.<br />

• CCAfrica owns 3667 ha, leases 11,226 ha, and<br />

traverses over the entire 23,335 ha Mun-ya-wana<br />

conservancy.<br />

• Operates interpretive photographic wildlife safaris,<br />

within a big 5 area & linkages to the coast<br />

• Corporate Social Responsibility program<br />

- the Africa <strong>Foundation</strong><br />

• Numerous conservation and local economic<br />

development initiatives<br />

Source: Kevin Pretorius and<br />

Andrew Campbell<br />

3


Policy context<br />

• 1997 White Paper on South <strong>African</strong> Land Policy: Land restitution –<br />

and land claims for land that people were displaced from during<br />

Apartheid<br />

• 1998 National Environmental Management Act: Governing<br />

environmental impacts of infrastructure development<br />

• 1998 Employment Equity Act / Tourism Black Economic<br />

Empowerment (BEE) Charter and Scorecard: Reporting on<br />

employment and training of historically disadvantaged individuals<br />

(black, women, disabilities)<br />

• Landowner policy for the reserve:<br />

– <strong>The</strong>re is a code of conduct; <strong>Phinda</strong> reserve manager manages Munyawana<br />

as a whole, including wildlife management, security, maintenance of fences<br />

under a reserve-wide environmental management plan<br />

– <strong>The</strong> community is consulted on management issues (alien plant control,<br />

bush clearing, road development, dam building).<br />

– <strong>The</strong> reserve constitution is currently being updated<br />

Source: Kevin Pretorius and<br />

Andrew Campbell<br />

4


Planning and development<br />

issues<br />

Context<br />

– <strong>The</strong> land was purchased as degraded farmland in 1991, and was<br />

rehabilitated and restocked with wildlife to provide a tourism<br />

attraction.<br />

– Part of land owned, part leased (but 2 nd land claim in progress on<br />

remainder). Forest lodge had an EIA because of location in sand<br />

forest. Other lodges were approved on the basis of information<br />

from the scoping phase (EIAs were not required).<br />

– <strong>The</strong> reserve constitution sets bed capacity limits at 1 bed per 75 ha<br />

(current density is 1 bed per 188 ha).<br />

Infrastructure – e.g. natural light, and cooling, waste disposal<br />

systems, construction materials, training craftspeople, décor,<br />

landscaping etc. Put fans on for aesthetic reasons. Lights on for<br />

aesthetic reasons inside (e.g. in chandeliers).<br />

– <strong>The</strong>re is a plan to construct and sell private lodges on the reserve<br />

called ‘<strong>African</strong> homesteads’ and EIAs will be required for each. 15<br />

sites are envisaged, with 4 bedrooms each (8 bed).<br />

Source: Kevin Pretorius and<br />

Andrew Campbell<br />

5


Reducing<br />

infrastructure<br />

impacts<br />

6


Planning & development issues:<br />

<strong>Phinda</strong> model and land tenure (1)<br />

Ownership<br />

Development<br />

Management<br />

Land and wildlife estate<br />

3667 ha owned by CCAfrica (awaiting<br />

notice under land claim)<br />

Communities own 6110 ha (Mnqobokazi)<br />

and 6550 ha (Makasa) and CCAfrica have<br />

72 year leases on each portion of land<br />

Additional 36 year leases on 1140 ha<br />

(Mnqobokazi) and 900 ha (Makasa)<br />

Traversing agreements on rest of land in<br />

reserve under other private ownership<br />

CCAfrica restocked wildlife and<br />

rehabilitated land<br />

Munyawana <strong>Reserve</strong> (CCAfrica reserve<br />

manager is head)<br />

Makhasa community<br />

owns Forest and Vlei<br />

lodges<br />

Rock/Mountain<br />

owned by CCAfrica<br />

Getty’s own Zuka<br />

Source: Kevin Pretorius and<br />

Andrew Campbell<br />

Commercial<br />

Infrastructure<br />

CCAfrica<br />

CCAfrica<br />

7


Planning & development issues:<br />

<strong>Phinda</strong> model and land tenure (2)<br />

Benefits of the model:<br />

• Released development capital from land<br />

• Plans for new lodges in Madagascar, Brazil, Peru, Costa Rica, more in Kenya<br />

and definitely +2 in Botswana, +2 in India<br />

• Benefits to communities – income and in equity<br />

• Long lease<br />

• Management control over wildlife and land<br />

Empowerment of local people:<br />

• <strong>The</strong> reserve director took local chiefs up to Tanzania to look at other lodges and<br />

give a wider perspective on CCAfrica<br />

• Some of the staff have now become shareholders(!)<br />

Source: Andrew Campbell<br />

8


Planning & development issues:<br />

Institutional Arrangements<br />

Mnqobokazi community<br />

Lessor 6110 ha land (72 year lease, following<br />

land claim)<br />

Lessor 1140 ha on 36 year lease<br />

Average rental 262 per ha<br />

(ranging R150 – 295 per ha)<br />

CCAfrica<br />

Lessee, Developer and Operator<br />

Owner of 3667 ha<br />

Makasa community<br />

Lessor 6550 ha land 72 year lease (following<br />

land claim)<br />

Lessor Forest and Vlei lodges<br />

Lessor 990 ha on 36 year lease<br />

Source: Kevin Pretorius and<br />

Andrew Campbell<br />

Traversing<br />

agreements<br />

11,109 ha<br />

9


Tourism products and<br />

activities (1)<br />

• Interpretive guided game drives and walks<br />

• Assisting vets on rhino monitoring programs<br />

• Beach trips (scuba diving and deep sea fishing can be<br />

arranged)<br />

• Horse riding<br />

• Turtle viewing (seasonal) – with a concession to drive on the<br />

beach north of Sodwana (concession fee of R54,000 for three<br />

months per year, + park entrance fees)<br />

• River boat trips and canoeing<br />

• Community trips (Africa <strong>Foundation</strong>)<br />

• Cultural tour (Sangoma etc.)<br />

• Retail shop<br />

• Internet and computer access<br />

Source: Andrew Campbell<br />

10


Tourism products and<br />

activities (2)<br />

Specialist safaris: e.g. 7 wonders in 7 days, which can include:<br />

• Specialist leopard day – with radio telemetry (1 drive)<br />

• Buffalo, and rhino or elephant tracking<br />

• Black rhino tracking (is trying to raise awareness – money goes back<br />

into the conservation)<br />

• Beach trip (scuba diving) (with Sodwana Bay lodge) and flight<br />

• Morning with cheetah<br />

• Lion drive<br />

• Canoeing on the river<br />

• Long day walks and sleeping in the bush<br />

• Elephant drive<br />

• Birding safaris<br />

• Bush meals (7 course meal)<br />

Also have tailor made safaris, specialist rhino and leopard darting safaris,<br />

specialist birding and photographic safaris.<br />

Source: Andrew Campbell<br />

11


Tourism<br />

activities<br />

12


Impacts of tourism<br />

• Environmental impacts and<br />

conservation<br />

• Social impacts, including training and<br />

skills development and stakeholders<br />

• Economic impacts, including value<br />

chain analysis and commercial issues<br />

13


Environmental impacts (1)<br />

• Location: 7 lodges in different habitats (Mountain,<br />

Rock, Forest, vlei, Getty, Zuka, walking safaris)-<br />

Sand forest; acacia savannah; broadleaf woodland;<br />

marshes; riverine; mountain; illala palm veld<br />

• Construction: Different designs. Forest lodge built in<br />

sand forest – each tree accounted for and<br />

construction company fined for any removed.<br />

• Activities: Non-consumptive wildlife viewing. Off<br />

road driving for lions, leopard and cheetah. Host<br />

wildlife researchers: leopard dynamics with radio<br />

collars; serval research (re-introduced); black and<br />

white rhino; elephant research. CCAfrica employ the<br />

elephant/white rhino researcher and black rhino<br />

researcher.<br />

Source: Kevin Pretorius and<br />

Andrew Campbell<br />

14


Environmental impacts (2)<br />

Conservation:<br />

• Rehabilitated agricultural and pastoral land. Supplemented 15,000 head of game. Wildlife<br />

conservation activities on the reserve have been so successful that <strong>Phinda</strong> has sold live cheetah,<br />

buffalo, white rhino to restock other reserves and parks in the region. Wildlife swaps: Nyala.<br />

• Re-introduced waterbuck and eland (part of their range).<br />

• Part of Black Rhino Range Expansion program: Started with 18 and now have 21. Owned 50:50<br />

with KZN Wildlife.<br />

• Wildlife management employees include 56 permanent staff and 40-50 contract workers at any<br />

time<br />

• Wildlife is counted by aerial survey – and rare species include black rhino, white rhino, elephant,<br />

lion, leopard and cheetah.<br />

• Full time alien plant control division - chromealena Other teams come in to clear and rehabilitate<br />

land as necessary. Relocation of elephant to balance numbers (other enterprise just paid for the<br />

relocation). <strong>Phinda</strong> game division – look after roads, fences, wildlife management (including<br />

relocation), liaise with researchers, (have reserve manager)<br />

• Some roads are not drivable after rains (on black cotton soil)<br />

• Fenced off sand forest from elephant and giraffe (because so little of this habitat left)<br />

• Future proposals to drop fences with Mkuze GR and Masaka community GR, but need to address<br />

poaching/traversing/wildlife management/land claims first. Existing leesee on Makhasa GR).<br />

Environmental education:<br />

• Guests regarding conservation during game drives and walks. Conservation lessons (paid for by<br />

‘wild child’ bracelet) R50 goes to Africa <strong>Foundation</strong> – and each lodge reimbursed for vehicle/staff<br />

costs) – plan for 1 per month for the reserve (244 children p/a (but have already had 7 trips) can fit<br />

8 children on each trip – 1 trip p/m)<br />

Source: Kevin Pretorius and<br />

Andrew Campbell<br />

15


Conservation of rare<br />

wildlife species<br />

16


Environmental impacts (3)<br />

Waste:<br />

• Food waste donated to local pig farmers.<br />

• All waste separated dry and wet at the lodges; single local contractor collects and takes<br />

waste to recycle plant on reserve; glass, tin, paper recyclables from him.<br />

• Non-recyclable waste goes to a local landfill at Hluhluwe.<br />

Source: Kevin Pretorius and Andrew<br />

Campbell; Photos Andrew Campbell<br />

17


Environmental impacts (4)<br />

Water:<br />

• Drinking water - from Hlhluwe municipal water (Mountain and rock) through a<br />

pipeline (have had drought for last 6 years). If that runs out – have to pump from<br />

a salty river and cannot drink it. Bottled mineral water from outside the reserve –<br />

moving to glass bottles which will be reused (currently in plastic bottles from<br />

Nelspruit).<br />

• Rain water caught around the lodges (jo-jo tanks) but need more to be installed.<br />

Potential to collect 1.2 million litres water (8% consumption). Difficult to collect at<br />

Forest lodge because of tree leaves. 10 x 10,000 litre jo-jo tanks for storage.<br />

Mountain has concrete water containers for Hlhluwe water, and 4 x 10,000 litre<br />

rain-water collection tanks for ice and cleaning cars.<br />

• Waste water –<br />

– Forest and Vlei – septic tanks, and grey water pumpted to central treatment plant.<br />

Water then pumped to natural pans in vlei in front of lodge A water purification system<br />

and then water goes into the pans. Quality tested every 3-4 months. Honeysuckers<br />

required 1x6 weeks – half the frequency of before. <strong>The</strong> purification system was<br />

installed.<br />

– Mountain - septic tank and grey water put thourh reed bed system before flowing into<br />

natural pan (reed bed in construction – due April)<br />

• Recently put in water meters (and divide by number of guests) for each camp.<br />

Same for staff accommodation.<br />

• No watering of gardens (no sprinker systems – no lawns) natural gardens.<br />

Notices in rooms<br />

Source: Kevin Pretorius and<br />

Andrew Campbell<br />

18


Sorting waste for<br />

recycling<br />

Rainwater<br />

collection from<br />

roofs<br />

19


Environmental impacts (5)<br />

Energy:<br />

• Eskom power grid (all lodges) with back up diesel generators (300 kV at Forest/Vlei; 350 kV<br />

at Mountain/Rock).<br />

• Walking safaris – rustic tented camp with gas and paraffin.<br />

• No solar currently but trailing switch to turn off whole room electricity when you leave. Guest<br />

and housekeeping can turn off when leave. So currently when have turndowns – everything<br />

left on.<br />

• Firewood exotic from outside reserve; charcoal from reserve.<br />

• Cooking on gas.<br />

Materials:<br />

• Include locally made bricks.<br />

• Wood is gum from Kwambonambi or Eshowe<br />

• Thatch is from highveld as local quality is poor.<br />

• Septic-tank friendly chemicals (e.g. soaps in guest bathrooms). Recycled glasses<br />

purchased at Rock and Vlei lodges.<br />

• Some firewood is from Paulpietersberg, and other sources are local blackwattle plantations:<br />

<strong>Phinda</strong> purchases 20 tons per order, and the reserve cuts it and distributes between the<br />

lodges.<br />

Monitoring and evaluation - Head rangers at each lodge monitor energy consumption –<br />

ecoaudit (mainly energy audit) and sustainability checklist monthly as part of management<br />

reports. At board level they review these – to look at level of improvement. Each lodge has<br />

a green team – of volunteers and champions of environmental management. Do litter cleanups,<br />

fixing erosion gullies etc.<br />

Source: Kevin Pretorius and<br />

Andrew Campbell<br />

20


SUSTAINABLE TOURISM CHECKLIST 07<br />

LODGE : <strong>Phinda</strong> Mountain <strong>Lodge</strong>……………...………………DATE…12/03/2008<br />

1 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT<br />

List completed by : Daryl Dell and Giles Kelmanson<br />

1. Do you have a natural resources inventory (EcoGuide) Is it attached to this file and used by the<br />

guests?<br />

2. Are you operating within the management plan for your area?( If yes attach it?)<br />

3. Do you monitor erosion and compaction of roads,pathways and bush dinner sites? (Give<br />

examples with Dates)<br />

4. Do you identify and remove alien plant species? (Examples , when last & Dates)<br />

5. Do you use local communities in implementing natural resource management plans?<br />

(Examples & Dates)<br />

NUMBER OF YES ANSWERS<br />

YES<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

5<br />

21<br />

NO


PERFORMANCE INDICATORS / Lowest<br />

score gets Highest rank, to help you<br />

prioritise.<br />

1 Environmental Management<br />

2 Cultural Resource Management<br />

3 Water Usage<br />

4 Energy Usage<br />

5 Waste Management<br />

6 Emergencies<br />

7 Contractors & Suppliers<br />

8 Social Upliftment and Local Dev.<br />

9 Benefits and training<br />

10 Staff Village<br />

11 Guest Orientation<br />

12 Marketing your Environment<br />

13 Being Innovative….<br />

14 Monitoring Guest delight.<br />

SELECTED ACTION AREA<br />

TOTAL<br />

SCORE<br />

5<br />

1<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

2<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

3<br />

5<br />

50<br />

RANK<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

22


Social impacts (1)<br />

• Governance: Community leaders, regional director (RD) of<br />

<strong>Phinda</strong>, reserve manager. RD had good relationship with local<br />

leader, but he died shortly after agreement, and his son taking<br />

over. So a new relationship is being forged with the new leader,<br />

including taking him on a trip to Tanzania to see other lodges in<br />

the group.<br />

• Local employment/education:<br />

• 248 local lodge employees, and additional 60 staff working on<br />

security and Alien Plant Unit<br />

• Rural poverty in neighbouring tribal areas extensive.<br />

• 3 neighbouring communities: Nibela, Mnqobokazi (popn. 5753 in<br />

2001 and Makasa (popn. 7996 in 2001).<br />

– Unemployment levels up to 77%<br />

– Illiteracy ~30%<br />

Currie, 2001; Andrew Campbell<br />

23


Social impacts (2)<br />

Education:<br />

• Built over 90 classrooms and renovated numerous classrooms<br />

• Built 3 Libraries<br />

• Built 1 Science Laboratory<br />

• Built ablutions at various schools<br />

• Provision of playground equipment and toys to various schools and crèche’s<br />

• Provision of school supplies and stationery to various schools<br />

• Provided over 150,000 books and Educational Aids<br />

• Built the Nibela Skills Training and Production Centre<br />

• Facilitated the establishment of 19 Pre-Schools<br />

• Facilitated the provision of electricity to one school<br />

• Implemented Edu-peg Educational Tools<br />

• Conducted Career Guidance for high school students<br />

• Granted university Bursaries/Scholarships – ongoing on an annual basis<br />

• Established the Mduku DevCentre Project (Digital Eco Village)<br />

• Implemented computer training lessons through the DevCentre<br />

• Conducted Conservation Lessons<br />

Africa <strong>Foundation</strong>, January 2008<br />

24


Social impacts (3)<br />

Health<br />

• Built 1 Clinic at Mduku and refurbished 1 clinic at KwaJobe<br />

• Conducted HIV / Aids Awareness Workshops<br />

• Distributed 233 Hippo Water Rollers<br />

• Access to water through the provision of water tanks, guttering and a<br />

borehole at one school<br />

• Implemented Permaculture Vegetable Garden at one school<br />

• Established a Skills and Health Centre to offer free HIV training and<br />

awareness workshops and distribute Positive Health products<br />

Income Generating Activities<br />

• Built Mbhedula Market in Mduku; and provided Capacity Building &<br />

Product Development Training to the Market Committee<br />

• Provided artisan skills training to 35 individuals from the communities<br />

Access to natural resources<br />

• communities remove grass for thatching, reeds for building, illala palms<br />

buffalo manure (for fertiliser) controlled by Tribal Authority, and quota of<br />

antelope for consumption (Chief and Iziduna). Resources negotiated<br />

annually with the reserve manager<br />

Africa <strong>Foundation</strong>, January 2008; Andrew<br />

Campbell, Kevin Pretorius<br />

25


Local community<br />

developments from<br />

Africa <strong>Foundation</strong><br />

26


Social impacts (4)<br />

Social problems:<br />

• No problems when tourists go out to community<br />

• <strong>The</strong>re has been poaching (although levels are very low, and mostly<br />

opportunistic and from a neighbouring community that has not previously<br />

received many benefits from <strong>Phinda</strong>).<br />

Cultural impacts:<br />

• Cultural tour: includes Sangoma, traditional homestead, see traditional<br />

dancing, speak to local people (to the two communities), taste zulu beer;<br />

traditions, purchasing local products – furnishings in rooms; shop produce<br />

from local women’s markets (with 0% mark-up), cultural<br />

tours/entertainment, dancing by staff (paid extra in evenings).<br />

• A free ‘Africa <strong>Foundation</strong>’ trip also takes place, to see local developments<br />

• Local community choirs, zulu warriors, childrens choirs, and they have link<br />

to community.<br />

• Want tea trolleys made – and local ladies will bead the. Each room will<br />

have jar of big zulu fighting sticks – will procure locally.<br />

• Ilala weavers will teach local people how to do beading – and is a zulu craft<br />

market where ladies are collected from and will set up stalls in lodge<br />

(infrequently).<br />

Spenceley and Seif, 2003, Andrew Campbell<br />

27


Social impacts (5)<br />

Staff accommodation<br />

• A number of different staff centres currently on the reserve (+/-<br />

10) and so plan to create one staff village.<br />

– Frontline will continue to stay at the lodges<br />

– General staff will stay in 1 village, on land on a 72 year lease from<br />

the Masaka community outside the reserve (~200-250 staff). <strong>The</strong><br />

value of the lease is still to be determined, and the development is<br />

planned to start at end of 2008. Plan to get Eskom grid electricity<br />

there<br />

• All infrastructure will be outside the reserve (aside from airstrip)<br />

including workshop, centralised stores. Ranger training camp<br />

will stay within the reserve<br />

Motivation for the change is control (supplies and people driving<br />

into lodges; impacts on game drives visually) and impacts<br />

(environmental and powerlines to places; waterpipes etc), and<br />

to upgrade staff accommodation.<br />

Source: Kevin Pretorius and<br />

Andrew Campbell<br />

28


Social impacts:<br />

Training and skills development<br />

• Guide training program (for all lodges) – with<br />

training facility at <strong>Phinda</strong><br />

• Human resources training programs for all<br />

staff. Each employee has a development plan<br />

of where they want to go.<br />

• Community skills development - 86 bursaries<br />

for tertiary studies over 10 years through<br />

RIF/AF in courses as varied as teaching,<br />

communications, environmental health,<br />

nature conservation, business, traffic safety,<br />

motor mechanics, and social work.<br />

Source: Kevin Pretorius and<br />

Andrew Campbell<br />

29


Social impacts:<br />

Stakeholders and their role<br />

• Local people<br />

– 3 main neighbouring communities: Nibela, Mnqobokazi and Makasa<br />

(2 landowners).<br />

– Mdleshe community is a 4 th community with further land claim (land is still to<br />

be gazetted and validation by the state to be completed. Propose an<br />

arrangement where community gains access to entire remaining land)<br />

• NGOs: Africa <strong>Foundation</strong> (set up by CCAfrica group). Stand alone but<br />

does all work for communities around CCAfrica. Was established by<br />

CCAfrica (and contributes financially to it). Some confusion within<br />

community if <strong>Phinda</strong> or AF helping with donations.<br />

• Donors: Many, including individuals and institutions<br />

(www.africafoundation.org)<br />

• <strong>Private</strong> sector: CCAfrica, other landowners in the reserve, shareholders<br />

include Capricorn Investments (Enthoven family – who own Spier too)<br />

and Getty (who also privately own the Zuka lodge)<br />

• Government: Addressing the land claim, KZN Wildlife on Black Rhino<br />

Range expansion program. A public road runs through <strong>Phinda</strong> that is<br />

used for extraction of mining operations within Mkuze.<br />

Source: Kevin Pretorius and<br />

Andrew Campbell<br />

30


Economic impacts (1)<br />

• Local ownership/equity: 100% private sector<br />

(company)<br />

• Local employment at the enterprise:<br />

– +/- 80% permanent staff (200 people) are from local<br />

population<br />

– 70-75% local wage bill locally (~R10 million p/a), with direct<br />

and indirect benefits to 1400-1600 people<br />

– Commitment to at least 60% employees check.<br />

• Local procurement of products and services:<br />

– Craft and pots for furnishings and shops from local weavers.<br />

– 45-50% expenditure on local goods within 50 km<br />

(R6.7 million p/a).<br />

– Local excursions and community trips are undertaken, and a<br />

cultural tour.<br />

Spenceley and Seif, 2003; Kevin Pretorius<br />

31


Local<br />

products<br />

32


Economic impacts<br />

• Investment in small businesses: product development for recycled<br />

paper, charcoal from alien invasive species; sewing company staff<br />

uniforms; brick making business; Mbhedula market, local taxi driver<br />

transporting staff,<br />

• Joint venture fund<br />

– <strong>Phinda</strong> assisting in setting up administration and accounting systems and<br />

will initially manage it, requested by community to do so.<br />

– Communities have bank accounts<br />

– All accounts audited annually by independent auditors.<br />

– Community decide on how to utilize rental incomes, they are in process of<br />

formulating how this will be done (one of the reasons for the recent<br />

Tanzania trip was to learn from community landlords there)<br />

– R9 million assistance fund usage needs to be agreed by <strong>Phinda</strong><br />

management and community trustees.<br />

– All above agreed by the whole community.<br />

– <strong>Phinda</strong> has tried to keep at arms length in this regard but has become<br />

involved at the communities request.<br />

• Impact on poverty: Need more detailed wages data<br />

Source: Kevin Pretorius and<br />

Andrew Campbell<br />

33


Economic impacts:<br />

Value chain analysis<br />

Text box for references<br />

Waiting for<br />

data<br />

34


Economic impacts:<br />

Capital structure<br />

Capital structure<br />

• Trust raised RXX-m ($1.5m):<br />

– Grants of RX-m ($Y k):<br />

• R X-million from XXX<br />

• R X-million from XXX<br />

• R X from XXX<br />

– Interest-bearing loans of RX-m<br />

($Y)*:<br />

• R 2.5-million from XXX<br />

• R 2.5-million from XXX<br />

* Lease rights ceded to IDC as<br />

security<br />

• <strong>Private</strong> operator invested RX<br />

million<br />

23%<br />

38%<br />

Text box for references<br />

Waiting for<br />

data<br />

39%<br />

Grants<br />

Loans<br />

<strong>Private</strong><br />

35


Economic impacts:<br />

Commercial issues<br />

• Viability:<br />

– Seven luxury lodges offering varying experiences have been<br />

developed on the reserve: Rock, Forest, Mountain and Vlei,<br />

Walking (106 beds together), Getty (8), Zuka (8), offering a total of<br />

122 beds at prices ranging between $350-700 p/p/n<br />

– Black rhino tourism activities (darting safaris) not enough to finance<br />

their conservation.<br />

• Marketing: Brochures, Internet, Trade fairs, Low season offers,<br />

Links with tour operators, Group contains tour operator.<br />

• Visitation and demand:<br />

– Bed occupancies for 2007/8 was 71% across the reserve<br />

– Forest/Vlei: June-Dec 07 83% bed occupancy<br />

– Mountain/Rock: June-Dec 07 62% bed occupancy<br />

• Communication: Email, cellphone, landline, radios for guides<br />

36<br />

Spenceley and Seif, 2003; Spenceley and Barnes, 2005


Strengths:<br />

Current issues and<br />

replicability<br />

Long-standing relationship between private<br />

operator and community<br />

Established system of channelling donations<br />

into local development projects with<br />

substantial impacts<br />

Secure land tenure<br />

Commercially viable enterprise<br />

Good environmental / conservation<br />

management<br />

Diverse range of nature-based activities<br />

Opportunities<br />

Transfer of land to two local communities<br />

through land-claim process<br />

Revenue to community through lease<br />

substantial and could provide substantial<br />

opportunities for development<br />

Options for private lodges<br />

Weaknesses<br />

Mechanism for transparency/accountability on spend of<br />

community revenue still to be established<br />

Monitoring of environmental, social and economic<br />

performance, without verification<br />

No use of renewable energy<br />

Threats<br />

One more land claim to settle on the <strong>Phinda</strong> estate<br />

Instability caused by initial land claim payment?<br />

Honey pot effect?<br />

37


Lessons learned<br />

• Potential to transform a private sector venture<br />

effectively into a joint-venture model<br />

• Long term private sector relationship with<br />

community reduces risks of land tenure instability<br />

and poaching<br />

• Coupling strategy philanthropy with value chainrelated<br />

benefits and employment<br />

• Investment in wildlife/land management can be<br />

profitable<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!