30.01.2013 Views

SUBJECT: COMMENTS ON NRC PROPOSED RULE ...

SUBJECT: COMMENTS ON NRC PROPOSED RULE ...

SUBJECT: COMMENTS ON NRC PROPOSED RULE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Furthermore, no judgment is implied as to the relative risk of nuclear<br />

power as ccmpared to other technologies or the relative importance of<br />

sabotage as a contributor to the risk from nuclear power production.<br />

This restricted viewpoint must be kept in mind as the following mate-<br />

rial is reviewed.<br />

The basic objective of nuclear power plant safeguards is to re-<br />

duce to an acceptable level the risk of public exposure to radiologi-<br />

cal hazards caused by malevolent actions directed againat the facil-<br />

ity. The earlier studies indicate that sabotage leading to a release<br />

of radioactive materials is the principal safeguards concern with re-<br />

gard to power reactors (References 2 and 3). The public risk from<br />

such malevolent acts is discussed here in qualitative terms along with<br />

the relationship between the safeguards objective and plant design.<br />

Design objectives which cover the significant parameters affecting<br />

risk are identified.<br />

Factors Defining Public Risk from Malevolent Acts -- In general,<br />

risk can be defined as the expected loss caused by the conduct of an<br />

activity for a given period of time. Therefore, risk can be ex-<br />

pressed as the product of the frequency of events and the magnitude of<br />

the loss per event. For events which are purposely initiated, the<br />

frequency of events depend6 upon the frequency of attempts to produce<br />

some consequence and the conditional probability that an attempt is<br />

successful. In sane instances, there may be a range of possible con-<br />

sequences that can be caused and a number of ways by which the same<br />

level of consequence can be induced. Thus, a consideration of risk<br />

requires evaluation of several interacting parameters. Risk is not<br />

only a function of the ways by which a saboteur might attempt to cause<br />

a release but aLso of the actions which can be taken tu counteract the<br />

attempt. Same mbotage events might be corrected or modified by dam-<br />

age control measures to prevent or significantly limit the conse-<br />

quences, and independent actions of consequence mitigation might be<br />

taken to reduce the public impact of malevolent acts.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!