Protecting Workers from Ultraviolet Radiation - icnirp
Protecting Workers from Ultraviolet Radiation - icnirp
Protecting Workers from Ultraviolet Radiation - icnirp
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Protecting</strong> <strong>Workers</strong> <strong>from</strong> <strong>Ultraviolet</strong> <strong>Radiation</strong><br />
view may be important, depending upon the source to be measured. The size of the<br />
measurement aperture is important if the irradiation field is highly non-homogenous, and the<br />
angular response and the field of view are important (they are also different for eye and skin<br />
hazard evaluation) if the source is very large.<br />
8.3.2 Spectroradiometers<br />
Spectroradiometry is the technique for measuring the spectral irradiance (measurement showing<br />
spectral shape and power) that is produced by a source of optical radiation at a given position<br />
relative to the source. The three basic features of a spectrometer system are the input optics,<br />
designed to conduct the radiation <strong>from</strong> the source into the monochromator, which disperses the<br />
radiation onto a detector. For accurate measurements of UVR, it is necessary to use a double<br />
monochromator. Single monochromators may suffer <strong>from</strong> stray light problems which result in<br />
erroneous measurement. Particularly problematic is the use of diode arrays to measure UVR.<br />
Double monochromators are expensive instruments but are the most accurate and precise tools.<br />
They are not needed for routine safety surveys and monitoring, but rather in laboratories for lamp<br />
risk group determination or for research projects or experts assessments on work place safety.<br />
8.3.3 Broad-band UV radiometers<br />
For practical hazard evaluations, broad-band integrating UV safety meters with detectors that<br />
mimic the ICNIRP UV-hazard action spectra are the most useful instruments. These safety<br />
meters basically consist of a photodetector with spectral filters and an electronic readout unit.<br />
They are generally calibrated to read directly in effective UV irradiance or in effective radiant<br />
exposure. Some even indicate maximal permissible exposure duration tmax. Achieving a detector<br />
that truly responds to the required action spectrum such as S(λ) or to only be sensitive to the<br />
UVA in an unweighted fashion is very difficult. Consequently, the detector can only<br />
approximate the required action spectrum and the measured effective value can in some cases<br />
(depending on the quality of the meter and on the spectral distribution of the source) be seriously<br />
erroneous. The detector can be calibrated more accurately for a few representative sources such<br />
as xenon arcs, germicidal lamps or tungsten-halogen lamps. Similar instruments originally<br />
designed as erythemal biometers that follow the spectral response of the CIE erythemal<br />
effectiveness curve also respond mainly to UVB/C radiation with a variable response in the<br />
UVA. These can be calibrated with some degree of accuracy for a few representative sources in<br />
terms of ICNIRP effective irradiance. However, UV meters designed to mimic action spectra for<br />
germicidal applications or photocuring applications will generally have such strongly different<br />
spectral response that they would not be useful for hazard evaluation.<br />
In terms of the geometrical sensitivity of the detector, most instrument manufacturers aim to<br />
achieve a cosine receptor response, which is desirable for assessing skin exposure <strong>from</strong> extended<br />
sources. However, for assessment of eye exposure, a field of view attachment fulfilling the<br />
measurement criteria in the guideline of ± 40° is useful (and for the measurement, the detector<br />
should be aimed along the line-of-sight of the eyes and not upward toward sources that are not<br />
constantly viewed). An “open” field of view would overestimate the exposure value.<br />
46