02.02.2013 Views

Protecting Workers from Ultraviolet Radiation - icnirp

Protecting Workers from Ultraviolet Radiation - icnirp

Protecting Workers from Ultraviolet Radiation - icnirp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Protecting</strong> <strong>Workers</strong> <strong>from</strong> <strong>Ultraviolet</strong> <strong>Radiation</strong><br />

view may be important, depending upon the source to be measured. The size of the<br />

measurement aperture is important if the irradiation field is highly non-homogenous, and the<br />

angular response and the field of view are important (they are also different for eye and skin<br />

hazard evaluation) if the source is very large.<br />

8.3.2 Spectroradiometers<br />

Spectroradiometry is the technique for measuring the spectral irradiance (measurement showing<br />

spectral shape and power) that is produced by a source of optical radiation at a given position<br />

relative to the source. The three basic features of a spectrometer system are the input optics,<br />

designed to conduct the radiation <strong>from</strong> the source into the monochromator, which disperses the<br />

radiation onto a detector. For accurate measurements of UVR, it is necessary to use a double<br />

monochromator. Single monochromators may suffer <strong>from</strong> stray light problems which result in<br />

erroneous measurement. Particularly problematic is the use of diode arrays to measure UVR.<br />

Double monochromators are expensive instruments but are the most accurate and precise tools.<br />

They are not needed for routine safety surveys and monitoring, but rather in laboratories for lamp<br />

risk group determination or for research projects or experts assessments on work place safety.<br />

8.3.3 Broad-band UV radiometers<br />

For practical hazard evaluations, broad-band integrating UV safety meters with detectors that<br />

mimic the ICNIRP UV-hazard action spectra are the most useful instruments. These safety<br />

meters basically consist of a photodetector with spectral filters and an electronic readout unit.<br />

They are generally calibrated to read directly in effective UV irradiance or in effective radiant<br />

exposure. Some even indicate maximal permissible exposure duration tmax. Achieving a detector<br />

that truly responds to the required action spectrum such as S(λ) or to only be sensitive to the<br />

UVA in an unweighted fashion is very difficult. Consequently, the detector can only<br />

approximate the required action spectrum and the measured effective value can in some cases<br />

(depending on the quality of the meter and on the spectral distribution of the source) be seriously<br />

erroneous. The detector can be calibrated more accurately for a few representative sources such<br />

as xenon arcs, germicidal lamps or tungsten-halogen lamps. Similar instruments originally<br />

designed as erythemal biometers that follow the spectral response of the CIE erythemal<br />

effectiveness curve also respond mainly to UVB/C radiation with a variable response in the<br />

UVA. These can be calibrated with some degree of accuracy for a few representative sources in<br />

terms of ICNIRP effective irradiance. However, UV meters designed to mimic action spectra for<br />

germicidal applications or photocuring applications will generally have such strongly different<br />

spectral response that they would not be useful for hazard evaluation.<br />

In terms of the geometrical sensitivity of the detector, most instrument manufacturers aim to<br />

achieve a cosine receptor response, which is desirable for assessing skin exposure <strong>from</strong> extended<br />

sources. However, for assessment of eye exposure, a field of view attachment fulfilling the<br />

measurement criteria in the guideline of ± 40° is useful (and for the measurement, the detector<br />

should be aimed along the line-of-sight of the eyes and not upward toward sources that are not<br />

constantly viewed). An “open” field of view would overestimate the exposure value.<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!