02.02.2013 Views

Protecting Workers from Ultraviolet Radiation - icnirp

Protecting Workers from Ultraviolet Radiation - icnirp

Protecting Workers from Ultraviolet Radiation - icnirp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Protecting</strong> <strong>Workers</strong> <strong>from</strong> <strong>Ultraviolet</strong> <strong>Radiation</strong><br />

If the source is larger than 80° and the field of view of the instrument is not limited, then the<br />

exposure level is overestimated. For skin measurements, the angular dependence of the<br />

sensitivity of the detector within the field of view should be following a cosine law (see next<br />

paragraph). Due to the difference of the field of view for measurements for skin or eye<br />

exposure, for sources which subtend an angle larger than 80° at the distance of evaluation, the<br />

exposure level which is compared to the exposure limit will be different (less for the eye than for<br />

the skin). Therefore, although the UVR exposure limit is the same, since the exposure level for a<br />

given source and exposure distance, might be different, the exposure of the eye might be below<br />

the exposure limit while the exposure of the skin might be above the exposure limit.<br />

8.5.3 Cosine dependence<br />

The dependence of the sensitivity of the detector on the angle of incidence of the radiation<br />

should follow a cosine dependence. Thus the detector mimics the directional sensitivity of the<br />

human skin, which is assumed to be a plane surface. However, this is relevant only for sources<br />

which are extended, i.e. non-point sources. The larger the source is, the more important it is that<br />

the detector features a good cosine response even up to larger angles off the normal.<br />

8.5.4 Spectral responsivity<br />

The spectral responsivity of the detector should ideally be identical to the applicable action<br />

spectrum. This is the biggest practical problem encountered with the use of UVR meters.<br />

<strong>Radiation</strong> outside of the wavelength range over which the action spectrum is defined should be<br />

rejected, i.e. not contribute to the measured value. Some UV-detectors and spectrometers are<br />

also erroneously sensitive in the visible region. As the visible radiation level of the source being<br />

measured is often much higher than the UV-level, this may severely compromise the accuracy of<br />

the measurement. Without a specific calibration of the broadband meter for the source that is to<br />

be measured, it is not recommended to use broadband meters for critical measurements such as<br />

for expert opinions.<br />

8.5.5 Minimum sensitivity<br />

The minimum sensitivity of a measurement system can be estimated by considering the exposure<br />

limit given as a radiant exposure (dose) and the expected exposure duration. The minimum<br />

sensitivity in terms of measured irradiance is calculated by dividing the exposure limit by the<br />

exposure duration. For instance, with an exposure limit of 30 J m -2 and an expected maximum<br />

exposure duration of 8 hours, the minimal level of irradiance which can lead to exceeding the<br />

exposure limit (and thus should be the sensitivity limit of the radiometer) is 10 -3 W m -2 (1 mW m -<br />

2 , or 0.1 µW cm -2 ).<br />

8.5.6 Dynamic range<br />

Especially for spectroradiometers, a large dynamic range is often necessary for accurate<br />

measurements, especially when there is a weak source emission in the UVC/UVB region and a<br />

strong emission in the UVA region, as the action spectrum is dominant in the UVC/UVB and the<br />

UVA region contributes relatively little to the effective irradiance.<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!