02.02.2013 Views

Protecting Workers from Ultraviolet Radiation - icnirp

Protecting Workers from Ultraviolet Radiation - icnirp

Protecting Workers from Ultraviolet Radiation - icnirp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8.4.5 Moving Source<br />

<strong>Protecting</strong> <strong>Workers</strong> <strong>from</strong> <strong>Ultraviolet</strong> <strong>Radiation</strong><br />

Sometimes the UV source is moving or the radiation field is changing its direction, e.g. a moving<br />

UV spotlight beam. It may be difficult to determine an accurate cumulative exposure of people in<br />

such cases.<br />

8.4.6 Non-visible source radiation and reflections<br />

It is rare that a UVR source does not also emit at least some visible radiation and the source itself<br />

can be seen. However, one should not judge the source of radiation solely by what is visible.<br />

For example, the character of reflections within the workplace can frequently not be judged <strong>from</strong><br />

the material characteristics in the visible spectrum. Many materials, such as most white paints are<br />

not reflective in the UV spectral region, particularly in the UVB and UVC regions. Some<br />

metals, particularly aluminium, maybe highly reflective in the ultraviolet wavelength range. For<br />

instance, reflections might become relevant if protective measures, such as face shields, do not<br />

protect against radiation <strong>from</strong> all directions.<br />

8.4.7 Choice of instrumentation<br />

In some situations where high accuracy is needed, a double-grating monochromater<br />

spectroradiometer should be used to measure the spectral irradiance at a given reference point. A<br />

broad-band radiometer would be used to determine the time or position dependent irradiance,<br />

relative to the reference point measurement.<br />

8.5 Relevant properties of measurement systems<br />

For the measurement of exposure levels to be compared to the exposure limits as noted in<br />

Paragraph 8.3.1, geometrical aspects of the exposure must be considered. The following<br />

properties of measurement systems are relevant for obtaining valid data to be compared to<br />

exposure limits. It is noted that the aperture diameter, field of view (FOV) (acceptance angle),<br />

and the cosine dependence of the detector are important.<br />

8.5.1 Irradiance averaging<br />

The diameter of the input aperture of the detector does not have an impact on the measurement if<br />

the irradiance profile is homogeneous. If there are hotspots in the irradiance profile, the diameter<br />

of the aperture should be small enough to resolve the hotspot, however, it is usually not<br />

necessary to use aperture diameters less than ~ 7 – 10 mm unless laser beams are being<br />

measured.<br />

8.5.2 Field of view (acceptance angle)<br />

The field of view of the detector (the “part” of the world which is seen by the detector) should be<br />

180° for measurements to be used for skin hazard assessment and should be limited to 80° (± 40<br />

° <strong>from</strong> the normal) for measurements to be used for eye hazard assessment. The field of view for<br />

eye evaluations does not play a role if the source is smaller than the field of view of the detector.<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!