05.02.2013 Views

From Principle-Based Risk Management to Solvency ... - Scor

From Principle-Based Risk Management to Solvency ... - Scor

From Principle-Based Risk Management to Solvency ... - Scor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Executive Summary<br />

This SST-model documentation will give the reader of the SST report the<br />

orientation about the origin, purpose and interpretation of the results stemming<br />

from SCOR’s internal model . As the results of the internal model<br />

are used by SCOR’s <strong>to</strong>p management for their decision findings, a clear<br />

understanding of the model framework should be supported by this documentation.<br />

To mention some of the major decisions backed by the internal<br />

model results, there are the need for the overall capital and hybrid debt<br />

requirements (implying an assessment of the equity dimension of hybrid<br />

instruments), the strategic asset allocation (based on different risk-return<br />

outcomes of the company’s value depending on different asset allocations),<br />

the capital allocation <strong>to</strong> major risk sources (based on the contributions <strong>to</strong> the<br />

overall risk of a risk driver) and, therefore, the future direction of SCOR’s<br />

business and, last but not least, risk mitigation measures (such as the impact<br />

of retrocession programmes).<br />

However, the focus of the SST-Report lies in the thorough investigation<br />

and analysis of the <strong>Solvency</strong> capital requirements (SCR), i.e. the difference<br />

between risk-bearing capital and target capital, based on the valuation of the<br />

economic balance sheet of the legal entities of the company at the beginning<br />

andtheendoftherelatedperiod.<br />

The definitions of the terms related <strong>to</strong> the SCR are outlined in several<br />

documents published by the FOPI (see, for instance, “Technisches Dokument<br />

zum Swiss <strong>Solvency</strong> Test” Version 2 Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2006, p. 3/4 and also in<br />

Part I of this documentation). In general, risk-bearing capital is measured<br />

as the difference of the market value of assets and the best estimate of liabilities<br />

assuming a run-off perspective after one year, even if some assets or<br />

liabilities are not on the formal balance sheet after one year, e.g. embedded<br />

value of the life business, whereas the target capital requirement is computed<br />

as the difference between the expected economic risk-bearing capital at the<br />

beginning of the period and the expected shortfall at risk <strong>to</strong>lerance level<br />

1% of the risk-bearing capital at the end of the period under consideration<br />

plus the cost of capital required <strong>to</strong> settle the associated run-off portfolio, i.e.<br />

the market value margin (MVM).<br />

Any assessment of the future development of assets and liabilities depending<br />

on all relevant risk fac<strong>to</strong>rs is based on a Monte Carlo simulation<br />

xii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!