- Page 1: Ghent University Faculty of Science
- Page 7: To My Wife, Fatemeh For my sons, Po
- Page 10 and 11: VIII This work could not have been
- Page 13 and 14: Table of contents CHAPTER 1 GENERAL
- Page 15 and 16: Chapter 1 General introduction
- Page 17 and 18: time (Glenn-Lewin & van der Maarel
- Page 19 and 20: tolerant (competitively superior) a
- Page 21 and 22: inundation (Egan & Ungar 2000; Wolt
- Page 23 and 24: colonizers have shorter and lighter
- Page 25 and 26: exhibit increased species diversity
- Page 27 and 28: grazing-sensitive species, because
- Page 29 and 30: The ability of certain plants to su
- Page 31 and 32: successional species tend to form p
- Page 33 and 34: ● ○ Fig. 1.3. The position of t
- Page 35 and 36: A B Fig. 1.5. Photos taken by Massa
- Page 37 and 38: sedimentation and erosion, topograp
- Page 39 and 40: In chapter 3, all plots of which in
- Page 41 and 42: important as a natural flood contro
- Page 43 and 44: show cyclical and directional veget
- Page 45 and 46: The relationships between biotic an
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 2 Factors affecting the suc
- Page 49 and 50: Key words: Site suitability, Seed d
- Page 51 and 52: spatial distribution of seed source
- Page 53 and 54:
uildings and slurry material during
- Page 55 and 56:
methodology of ter Heerdt et al. (1
- Page 57 and 58:
from 2003 until 2007. For each plan
- Page 59 and 60:
significant correlation between spe
- Page 61 and 62:
2.4.4 Plant traits Seeds of early c
- Page 63 and 64:
correlation between the abundance o
- Page 65 and 66:
In our study, most species growing
- Page 67 and 68:
Chapter 3 Inundation frequency dete
- Page 69 and 70:
are getting more and more spatially
- Page 71 and 72:
(Odland & del Moral 2002). Similar
- Page 73 and 74:
3.3 Material and methods 3.3.1 Stud
- Page 75 and 76:
% 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
- Page 77 and 78:
Cover(%) Cover(%) 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.
- Page 79 and 80:
of perennials increased by 86% betw
- Page 81 and 82:
Annual cover (%) Perennial cover (%
- Page 83 and 84:
Annual cover (%) Perennial cover (%
- Page 85 and 86:
3.5 Discussion Annual species were
- Page 87 and 88:
addition, in the salt-marsh environ
- Page 89 and 90:
Chapter 4 Short-term impact of shee
- Page 91 and 92:
athericus. A higher intensity of mi
- Page 93 and 94:
In this context, the use of managem
- Page 95 and 96:
and Phragmites australis, and to ma
- Page 97 and 98:
determined based on the van Soest a
- Page 99 and 100:
p
- Page 101 and 102:
Species richness Total cover(%) 1.6
- Page 103 and 104:
Table 4.2. Comparisons between excl
- Page 105 and 106:
4.5 Discussion The results show tha
- Page 107 and 108:
species and refresh leaves and stem
- Page 109 and 110:
Chapter 5 Environmentally determine
- Page 111 and 112:
appearance of gaps in the perennial
- Page 113 and 114:
(Christensen & Peet 1984; McClanaha
- Page 115 and 116:
percentages of particle diameter of
- Page 117 and 118:
0.8 Axis 2 -0.6 1.0 Axis 2 EC A Par
- Page 119 and 120:
5.4.3 The results of logistic regre
- Page 121 and 122:
propagules disperse themselves very
- Page 123 and 124:
5.6 Conclusion Vegetation analyses
- Page 125 and 126:
Chapter 6 The effect of successiona
- Page 127 and 128:
colonizers, while most perennial sp
- Page 129 and 130:
(Espinar et al. 2005). The density
- Page 131 and 132:
The area of IJzermonding has recent
- Page 133 and 134:
dependent variables while, depth ca
- Page 135 and 136:
Similarity(%) Similarity(%) 40 35 3
- Page 137 and 138:
Seed density(m²) Seed density(m²)
- Page 139 and 140:
Table 6.2. Relative abundance of sp
- Page 141 and 142:
As shown in Table 6.2, Saeftinghe a
- Page 143 and 144:
contrast, some authors demonstrated
- Page 145 and 146:
seedlings of both can not be distin
- Page 147 and 148:
Chapter 7 General conclusions
- Page 149 and 150:
athericus when salt-marshes become
- Page 151 and 152:
according to Dausse et al. (2008) i
- Page 153 and 154:
Species replacement takes place due
- Page 155 and 156:
absence/occurrence of perennial as
- Page 157 and 158:
characterized as a late-successiona
- Page 159 and 160:
necessary, and may elucidate why so
- Page 161 and 162:
References Adam, P. 1990. Saltmarsh
- Page 163 and 164:
Bakker, J.P., Poschlod, P., Strykst
- Page 165 and 166:
Bossuyt, B., Stichelmans, E. & Hoff
- Page 167 and 168:
Clements, F.E. 1916. Plant Successi
- Page 169 and 170:
Dijkema, K. S. 1987. Changes in sal
- Page 171 and 172:
Falinska, K. 1999. Seed bank dynami
- Page 173 and 174:
esearch review. pp. 5-10. Institute
- Page 175 and 176:
Hillebrand, H. & Blenckner, T. 2002
- Page 177 and 178:
Huckle, J.M., Potter, J.A. & Marrs,
- Page 179 and 180:
Kiehl, K. 1997. Vegetationsmuster i
- Page 181 and 182:
Lamoot, I., Vandenberghe, C., Bauwe
- Page 183 and 184:
Mayer, A.M. & Poljakoff-Mayber, A.
- Page 185 and 186:
Olff, H., Bakker, J.P. & Fresco, L.
- Page 187 and 188:
Pétillon, J., Georges, A., Canard,
- Page 189 and 190:
Ramseier, D. 2000. Why remove the t
- Page 191 and 192:
Redecker, B., Finck, P., Härdtle,
- Page 193 and 194:
properties of vertisol in East Afri
- Page 195 and 196:
Ungar, I.A. & Woodell, S.R.J. 1996.
- Page 197 and 198:
dicotyledonous wetland species with
- Page 199 and 200:
Ysebaert, T., Meininger, P.L., Meir
- Page 201 and 202:
Summary Plant succession is the cha
- Page 203 and 204:
successional stages new colonizers
- Page 205 and 206:
Appendices Appendix A - The positio
- Page 207 and 208:
Appendix B - The position of the ve
- Page 209 and 210:
Appendix C - The position of the ex
- Page 211 and 212:
Appendix D - The position of the ve
- Page 213 and 214:
Appendix E.1 - The position of the
- Page 215 and 216:
Appendix E.2 - The position of the
- Page 217 and 218:
Appendix F - Relative abundance of
- Page 219 and 220:
Appendix G - Relative abundance of