12.02.2013 Views

Species and Community Profiles - San Francisco Estuary ...

Species and Community Profiles - San Francisco Estuary ...

Species and Community Profiles - San Francisco Estuary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Other Birds<br />

Figure 7.1 Christmas<br />

Bird Count data for<br />

Snowy Egret — Approximate<br />

geographic<br />

location of Count<br />

circles indicated by<br />

dashed lines<br />

National Audubon<br />

Society’s Audubon Field<br />

Notes, <strong>and</strong> its successor<br />

publications, American<br />

Birds, <strong>and</strong> Field Notes,<br />

Volumes 24-51.<br />

Marin County (southern), <strong>and</strong> Arroyo Cheap Thrills.<br />

For all of these counts, the numbers are comparable <strong>and</strong><br />

show no substantial changes in the last 25 years. The<br />

aggregate number of birds counted in the nine CBC<br />

circles shown in Figure 7.1 can be approximated by<br />

summing the mean number recorded on each count.<br />

This aggregate mean, 1,112 birds, represents a lower<br />

bound of the birds present in <strong>San</strong> <strong>Francisco</strong> Bay, as not<br />

all estuarine habitats are sampled within these circles,<br />

<strong>and</strong> it is likely that some birds were missed during these<br />

counts. Comparisons of Palo Alto CBC <strong>and</strong> Summer<br />

Bird Count (SBC) data obtained in the same count circle<br />

allow a comparison of summer <strong>and</strong> winter numbers using<br />

identical census protocols. These data show essentially<br />

the same population in both the summer <strong>and</strong> winter<br />

seasons, <strong>and</strong> it appears that this species is permanently<br />

resident in this portion of the Bay.<br />

Historical Distribution – Within California,<br />

Grinnell <strong>and</strong> Miller (1944) considered the snowy egret<br />

to be a year-round resident below the 1,000-foot elevation<br />

level in the southern three-fourths of the State,<br />

which includes the <strong>San</strong> <strong>Francisco</strong> Bay Area. Elsewhere<br />

it was found only in the summer or as a vagrant. They<br />

326 Bayl<strong>and</strong>s Ecosystem <strong>Species</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>Profiles</strong><br />

described the Sacramento, <strong>San</strong> Joaquin, <strong>and</strong> Colorado<br />

River valleys as the chief location for this egret, but noted<br />

that it was found coastally from Marin County south to<br />

<strong>San</strong> Diego County.<br />

Prior to 1880, this species was considered locally<br />

common in the State (Grinnell <strong>and</strong> Miller 1944). Plume<br />

hunting, however, was as devastating to this species on<br />

the Pacific Coast as it was in the East, <strong>and</strong> starting in<br />

the 1880s, this species was nearly wiped out in the State.<br />

By the early 1900s, it was thought to be extinct within<br />

California. By the 1920s, it was considered a rare straggler<br />

to the Bay Area with only two locations noted<br />

(Grinnell <strong>and</strong> Wythe 1927). By the early 1940s, however,<br />

this species had started to recover <strong>and</strong> in favored<br />

places was locally common. Even by 1940, however, the<br />

only known breeding site was in Los Banos (Grinnell <strong>and</strong><br />

Miller 1944).<br />

By the early 1950s, in the South Bay, this species<br />

was considered an uncommon winter visitant (Sibley<br />

1952). Emily Smith (Audubon Field Notes 9:51) considered<br />

ten birds at Alviso on 30 August 1954 to be notable,<br />

<strong>and</strong> this was the largest number reported for the Middle<br />

Pacific Coast Region in that season. A survey of South

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!