14.02.2013 Views

Universal Periodic Review: The Status of Children's Rights - CRIN

Universal Periodic Review: The Status of Children's Rights - CRIN

Universal Periodic Review: The Status of Children's Rights - CRIN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Child <strong>Rights</strong> Information Network (<strong>CRIN</strong>) NGO Survey Findings<br />

Summary <strong>of</strong> NGO responses<br />

Pre-review Stage<br />

For NGOs, the period leading up to the review itself is taken up with: (1) Report Submission, (2) Lobbying:<br />

1) Report Submission<br />

Question 1a) Did you submit a report to the UPR individually or as a coalition / joint submission, and<br />

if as a coalition, was it an existing one or established specifically for the UPR?<br />

Response summary:<br />

<strong>The</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> organisations interviewed submitted reports as part <strong>of</strong> a coalition, with approximately one third<br />

submitting reports individually. Reasons primarily depended on the type <strong>of</strong> organisation writing the report and the<br />

situation in the country concerned, notably the safety <strong>of</strong> reporting on human rights. Of those organisations reporting as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> a coalition, more than half joined or were part <strong>of</strong> an existing coalition established to report to the CRC. Others<br />

implied that the coalitions were established specifically for the UPR. Some national NGOs explained how they joined<br />

coalitions for the UPR, which were made up <strong>of</strong> members focusing on the full range <strong>of</strong> human rights.<br />

Advantages <strong>of</strong> coalitions:<br />

Organisations reporting as a coalition (joint submissions) cited the following advantages:<br />

• Overcoming the issue <strong>of</strong> confidentiality / sensitivity: Organisations stated that in some countries it is not safe to<br />

report individually or sometimes at all. Being part <strong>of</strong> a coalition was <strong>of</strong>ten seen as an alternative option.<br />

• A more cohesive approach: Many organisations reported how coalitions provided an opportunity to join forces<br />

with other NGOs and construct a more cohesive approach to pressing the key issues.<br />

• Avoid duplication<br />

• Avoid using a new set <strong>of</strong> reporting guidelines: Often NGOs reporting as part <strong>of</strong> a coalition would submit<br />

information to the coordinator <strong>of</strong> the coalition on specific elements <strong>of</strong> the report. <strong>The</strong> coordinator would be<br />

responsible for following the UN guidelines, hence relieving the NGOs <strong>of</strong> this responsibility.<br />

• Strengthening relationships: Joining a coalition for the UPR can strengthen an organisation's ties with other<br />

NGOs focusing on children's rights and indeed broader human rights organisations. National NGOs in<br />

particular cited this as a key advantage.<br />

Advantages <strong>of</strong> individual submissions:<br />

One national NGO explained how they cooperate with other NGOs and determine who is going to focus on<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!