10.07.2015 Views

Consenso Mexicano de Osteoporosis - AMMOM

Consenso Mexicano de Osteoporosis - AMMOM

Consenso Mexicano de Osteoporosis - AMMOM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Consenso</strong> <strong>Mexicano</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>Osteoporosis</strong>en ratas 93 y que promueven aumento <strong>de</strong> DMO, aunque elefecto sobre fracturas en humanos, no ha sido aclarado. 94,95Combinación <strong>de</strong> agentes terapéuticosExisten algunos estudios que analizan la eficacia <strong>de</strong> la combinación<strong>de</strong> estrógenos con bifosfonatos, 96-99 <strong>de</strong>mostrandonotables incrementos <strong>de</strong> la DMO. Hallazgos semejantes sehan observado en la combinación <strong>de</strong> HPT con alendronato.100,101 Sin embargo, la combinación calcitonina con HPT oesteroi<strong>de</strong>s anabólicos no muestran ese efecto sinérgico. Elpapel <strong>de</strong> estas combinaciones aún requiere <strong>de</strong> estudios.FuturoEste documento presenta brevemente las opciones <strong>de</strong> diagnósticoy manejo <strong>de</strong> la osteoporosis. También nos presentaalgunos avances y su posible aplicación en un futuro cercanocontra este problema. Sin embargo, el futuro inmediatonos presenta el reto <strong>de</strong> cambiar las expectativas <strong>de</strong>l riesgofuturo <strong>de</strong> osteoporosis y fracturas secundarias a ella, a unacreciente población susceptible. Depen<strong>de</strong> en buena medida<strong>de</strong>l médico el que más pacientes potenciales se beneficiencon la prevención, <strong>de</strong>tección oportuna y su tratamiento temprano(Cuadro 13).Agra<strong>de</strong>cimientosMerck Sharp & Dohme <strong>de</strong> México brindó su apoyo financieroy logístico a la Asociación Mexicana <strong>de</strong> MetabolismoÓseo y Mineral (<strong>AMMOM</strong>) para la realización <strong>de</strong> este documento.Referencias1. Anónimo. Consensus Development Conference: Diagnosis, prophylaxisand treatment of osteoporosis. AM J Med 1993; 94:646-50.2. Lindsay R. The bur<strong>de</strong>n of osteoporosis: Costs. Am J Med 1995; 98 (Supp12ª): 9S-11S.3. Barret-Connor E. The economic and human cost of osteoporotic fractures.Am J Med 1995: 98 (Supp12):3S-8S.4. Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, Melton LJ III. Mortality following hip fracture.Facts Res Gerontol 1994; 7:91-109.6. Miller CW. Survival and ambulation following hip fracture. J. Bone JointSurg (Am) 1978; 60: 930-4.7. Jensen JS, Bagger J.Long-term social prognosis after hip fractures. ActaOrthop Scand 1982; 53:97-101.8. Magaziner J. Simonsick EM, Kashner TM, Hebel JR, Kenzora JE. Predictorsof functional recovery one year folllowing hospital discharge forhip fracture: A prospective study. J Gerontol 1990; 45:101-7.9. Cook DJ, Guyott GH, Adachi JD, et al. Quality of life issues un womenwith vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum 1993; 36:50-6.10. Lyles KW, Gold DT, Shipp KM, et al. Association of osteoporotic vertebralcompression fractures with impaired functional status. Am J Med1993; 94: 595-601.11. Ettinger B, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al. And the Study of OsteoporoticFractures Research Group. Contribution of vertebral <strong>de</strong>formities to chonicback pain and disability. J Bone MIner Res 1992; 7:449-56.12. Wadsworth TG. Colles’ fracture: failure in mangemente may causepermanent disability. BMJ 1990; 301:192-4.13. Silverman SL, Madison RE. Decreased inci<strong>de</strong>nce of hip fracture inhispanics, Asians and black: California hospital discharge data. Am J PublicHealth 1988; 78:1482-3.14. Ross PD, He YF, Yates AJ, Coupalnd C, et al. Body size accounts formost differences in bone <strong>de</strong>nsity between asian and afro-caribbean women.Clin Sci 1994; 87:339-43.15. Tobias JH, Cook DG, Chambers TJ, Dalzell N. A comparison of bonemineral <strong>de</strong>nsity between caucasian, asian and afro-caribbean wommen. ClinSci 1994; 87:587-91.16. Bauer RL. Ethnic differences in hip fracture; a reduced inci<strong>de</strong>nce inmexican americans. Am J Epi<strong>de</strong>miol 1988;127:145-9.17. Bauer RL, Deyo RA. Low risk of vertebral fracture in mexican americanwomen. Arch Intern Med 1987; 147:1437-9.18. Russell-Aulet , Wang J. Bone mineral <strong>de</strong>nsity and mass in a crossectionalstudy of white and asian women, J Bone Miner Res 1993; 8:575-82.19. Cundy T, Cornish J. Sources of interracial variation in bone mineral<strong>de</strong>nsity. J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10: 368-73.20. Mikhail MB, Vaswani AN, Aloja JF. Racial differences in femoraldimensions and their relation to hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 1996; 6:22-2.21. Kin K, Lee JHE, Kushida K, Sartoris DJ, et al. Bone <strong>de</strong>nsity and bodycomposition on the Pacific rim: Acomparison between japan born and USbornjapanese-american women. J Bone Miner Res 1993; 8:861-9.22. Cooper C, Campion C, Melton LJ III. Hip fractures in the el<strong>de</strong>rly: Aworldwi<strong>de</strong> projection. <strong>Osteoporosis</strong> Int 1992; 2:285-9.23. Cummings SR, Kelsey JL, Nevitt MC, O’Dowd KJ. Epi<strong>de</strong>miology ofosteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Epi<strong>de</strong>miol Rev 1985; 7:178-208.24. Chischilles EA, Butler CD. Amo<strong>de</strong>l of lifetime osteoporosis impact,Arch Intern Med 1991; 151: 2026-32.25. Lyritis GP. Osteoporotic fractures; Amajor health problem in the 1990’s.Third International Workshop on <strong>Osteoporosis</strong>: 1-5.26. Mautalen C, Pumarino H. Epi<strong>de</strong>miology of osteoporosis in South America.Osteoporos Int 1997; 7(Suppl 3):S73-S77.27. Parra-Cabrera MS, Hernán<strong>de</strong>z MG, et al. Fracturas <strong>de</strong> ca<strong>de</strong>ra enegresos<strong>de</strong> hospitales <strong>de</strong> León Gto. (México). Un indicador econométrico <strong>de</strong> osteoporosis.Rev Mens Epi<strong>de</strong>miol Junio 1993; 8:81-8.28. Gómez-García F, Figueroa F. Epi<strong>de</strong>miología en fracturas en mayores<strong>de</strong> 50 años. Rev Mex Reumatol 1997; 12:119-24.30. Borges-Yáñez A. Trasición <strong>de</strong>mográfica en México, situación <strong>de</strong> lapoblación anciana. Bol Mens Epi<strong>de</strong>miol Junio 1993; 8:81-8.31. The WHO Study Group. Assessment of fracture risk and its applicationto screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO technical report seriesno. 843, Geneva: World Health Organization; 1994.32. Melton LJ III, Chrischilles EA, Cooper C, Lane AW, Riggs BL. Howmany women have osteoporosis? J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10:175-7.33. Looker AC, Johnston CC Jr, Wahner HW, et al. Prevalence of low femoralbone <strong>de</strong>nsity in ol<strong>de</strong>r U.S. women from NHANES III. J Bone MinerRes 1995; 10: 796-802.34. Looker AC, Orwoll ES, Johnston CC, Lindsay RL, et al. Prevalence oflow femoral bone <strong>de</strong>nsity in ol<strong>de</strong>r U.S. adults from NHANES II. J BoneMiner Res 1997; 12:1761-8.35. Delezé M, Aguirre E, Villa A, et al. The prevalence of osteoporosis andosteopenia by DEXA in a apparently heathy mexican population. A multicenterstudy. Arthritis Rheum 1997; (Suppl)40:S41.36. Delezé M, Cons-Molina F, Villa AR, et al. Geographic differences inbone mineral <strong>de</strong>nsity of mexican women. Osteoporos Int 200; 11:562-9.37. Arzac P. Tamayo J, et al. How many women have osteoporosis in MedicaSur. <strong>Osteoporosis</strong> Clinic. J Bone Miner Res 1996; 11( Suppl 1):S36138. Stevenson JC, Lees B, Devenport M, Cust MP, Ganger KF. Determinantsof bone <strong>de</strong>nsity in normal women: risk factors for future osteoporosis? BMJ1989; 924-8.39. Seeman E, Allen T. Risk factors for osteoporosis. Aust NZJ Med 1989;19; 69-75.40. Stevenson JC, Lees B, Devenport M, Cust MP, Ganger KF. Determinantsof bone <strong>de</strong>nsity in normal women: risk factors for future osteoporosis? BMJ1989; 298: 924-8.41. Hansen MA, Overgaard K, Riis Bj, Chistiansen C. Potential risk factorsfor <strong>de</strong>velopment of postmenopausal osteoporosis examined over a 12- yearperiod. Osteoporos Int 1991; 1:95-102.42. Ross PD, Davis Jw, et al. Pre-existing fractures and mass predict vertebralfracture inci<strong>de</strong>nce in women. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114:919-23.43. Bauer DC, Browner WS, Cauley JA, et al. Factors associated withappendicular bone mass in ol<strong>de</strong>r women. The Study of Osteoporotic FractureResearch Group. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118: 657-65.Rev Metab Oseo Min. 2003; 1(1):1-24.19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!