frutos en el trabajo de Díaz et al., conceptos tales como psiconarración, monólogo narrado,monólogo rememorativo, o percepciones narradas. Así, la literatura y la teoría literariaofrecen un caudal de lo que los científicos denominan “intuiciones pre-teoréticas”, lascuales son siempre valiosas para la investigación científica. Ya que no es sólo la novela lamás grande expresión de psicología imaginaria, sino que constituye también, como dijeraPaul Riccoeur, “un instrumento para la investigación de la mente humana”…<strong>Luz</strong> <strong>Aurora</strong> <strong>Pimentel</strong>Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México12
BibliografíaBaars, Bernard. 1997. In the Theater of Consciousness. New York & Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.Bakhtine, Mikhail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays. Austin & London:University of Texas Press.Block, Ned. 1995. “On a Confusion about a Function of Consciousness,” Behavioral andBrains Sciences. 18:2, 227-287.———, Owen Flanagan, and Güven Güzeldere (eds.). 1997. The Nature of Consciousness.Philosophical Debates. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.Cohn, Dorrit. 1978. Transparent Minds: Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness.Princeton: Princeton University Press.Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. The Flow and Displacement ofConscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago & London: The Universityof Chicago Press.Chalmers, David. 1997 [1995]. “Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness,” cited in TheNature of Consciousness. 30.———. 1996. The Conscious Mind. In Search of a Fundamental Theory. New York &Oxford: Oxford University Press.Dennet, Daniel. 1997. “The Cartesian Theater and ‘Filling In’ the Stream ofConsciousness.” The Nature of Consciousness. 83-88.Díaz, José Luis, Reyna Paniagua, Evelyn Diez-Martínez. 1998. “El texto fenomenológicocomo objeto de análisis de procesos conscientes,” Salud mental, 21:1. 14-26.Edelman, Gerald. 1989. The Remembered Present. A Biological Theory of Consciousness.New York: Basic Books, Inc., Publishers.Flanagan, Owen. 1997. “Prospects for a Unified Theory of Consciousness,” The Nature ofConsciousness. 97-109.Genette,Gérard. 1972. “Discours du récit,” Figures III. Paris: Seuil.———. 1983. Nouveau discours du récit. Paris: Seuil.Güzeldere, Güven. 1997. “The Many Faces of Consciousness,” The Nature ofConsciousness. 1-67.Iser, Wolfgang. 1978 [1976]. The Act of Reading. A Theory of Aesthetic Response.Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Miller, G. 1962. Psychology: The Science of Mental Life. New York: Harper & RowPublishers.Nagel, Thomas. 1997 [1974]. “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?” The Nature of Consciousness.519-27.Riccoeur, Paul. 1981. “The Narrative Function,” Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences.Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.———. 1983. Temps et récit I. Paris: Seuil.13