26.04.2013 Views

Roman onomastics in the Greek East: social and political aspects ...

Roman onomastics in the Greek East: social and political aspects ...

Roman onomastics in the Greek East: social and political aspects ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

appears established before <strong>the</strong> endof<strong>the</strong> 1st century<br />

B.C. <strong>in</strong> Akanthos, <strong>the</strong> natural maritime outlet of<br />

<strong>the</strong> area <strong>and</strong>, more importantly, <strong>the</strong> safest port of<br />

call for ships l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>East</strong> to <strong>the</strong> West, at a time<br />

when l<strong>and</strong> transportations where plagued by<br />

barbarian raids <strong>and</strong> Philippi, with its port of<br />

Neapolis, were not yet under <strong>Roman</strong> control 5 .<br />

The situation was drastically remedied under <strong>the</strong><br />

peace of Augustus. With Thrace under <strong>Roman</strong><br />

control <strong>and</strong>, later, under direct <strong>Roman</strong> rule, with<br />

<strong>the</strong> establishment <strong>and</strong> fast development of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Roman</strong> colony at Philippi <strong>and</strong> that of Apri to <strong>the</strong><br />

North of <strong>the</strong> Thracian Chersonese some decades<br />

later 6 , <strong>the</strong> safety of <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong> transports was guaranteed.<br />

The importance of Akanthos seems to have<br />

decl<strong>in</strong>ed, her role be<strong>in</strong>g taken over by Neapolis, <strong>and</strong><br />

noth<strong>in</strong>g more is heard of its conventus c. <strong>Roman</strong>orum.<br />

Was it absorbed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> colony of Cass<strong>and</strong>reia?<br />

The assumption would have been plausible were<br />

it not for some unexpected evidence testify<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

<strong>the</strong> persistence of domiciliated <strong>Roman</strong>s <strong>in</strong><br />

Mygdonia, at least to <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> 1st century<br />

A.D. No less than 21 ephebes —out of a total of<br />

180, <strong>in</strong>deed 11%— <strong>in</strong> four different ephebic lists<br />

from <strong>the</strong> city of Kal<strong>in</strong>doia (modern Kalamoton)<br />

carry <strong>the</strong> <strong>Roman</strong> citizenship or use <strong>Roman</strong> nom<strong>in</strong>a<br />

(or derivatives of such nom<strong>in</strong>a) <strong>in</strong> an o<strong>the</strong>rwise<br />

<strong>Greek</strong> type of nomenclature 7 . To judge by <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

cognom<strong>in</strong>a, three of <strong>the</strong>m appear to belong to neo-<br />

<strong>Roman</strong>s of non Italic orig<strong>in</strong>, ow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir enfranchisment<br />

to emperors of <strong>the</strong> Julio-Claudian<br />

<strong>and</strong> Flavian dynasties: Τ. Κλαύδιος Ζώσιμος 8 , T.<br />

Φλάουϊος Απολλώνιος 9 , Γάϊος Ιούλιος Μαρας<br />

10 ; five o<strong>the</strong>rs are of Italic orig<strong>in</strong> on <strong>the</strong> evidence<br />

of <strong>the</strong>ir lat<strong>in</strong> cognom<strong>in</strong>a, enfranchised probably<br />

under <strong>the</strong> triumvirate or by some Julian emperor 1 '.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, eight ephebes, also of Italic orig<strong>in</strong>,<br />

descend probably from families of negotiatores n .<br />

The names of five o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>Roman</strong> geritesi, are deduced<br />

from various forms of nomenclature borne<br />

by non-<strong>Roman</strong> citizens, as are <strong>the</strong> names of <strong>the</strong><br />

Publicum <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ventuleni 15 attested <strong>in</strong> epitaphs<br />

of later date from <strong>the</strong> same area. It is noteworthy<br />

that none of <strong>the</strong>se non imperial gentes is attested<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> relatively scanty prosopography of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Roman</strong> colony of Cass<strong>and</strong>reia 16 .<br />

Archaeological <strong>and</strong>epigraphic discoveries from<br />

Kal<strong>in</strong>doia <strong>in</strong>dicate a majorrise of <strong>the</strong> importance<br />

144<br />

L. LOUKOPOULOU<br />

of <strong>the</strong> city under Augustus; <strong>the</strong>re is evidence for<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stauration <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> city of <strong>the</strong> cult of Rome <strong>and</strong><br />

Augustus —with monthly sacrifices, athletic<br />

contests <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r festivities— <strong>and</strong> for <strong>the</strong> dedication<br />

of a statue of Cesar Augustus funded by a<br />

wealthy citizen, Apollonios son of Apollonios son<br />

of Kertimmas 17 . Was it <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>flux <strong>in</strong> Kal<strong>in</strong>doia of<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Roman</strong> negotiatores of <strong>the</strong> area <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> establishment<br />

of <strong>the</strong> conventus c. <strong>Roman</strong>orumwhich<br />

accrued <strong>the</strong> city's importance <strong>and</strong> wealth, br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g<br />

5. Cicero's laments over <strong>the</strong> loss of control over <strong>the</strong><br />

essentially important military <strong>East</strong>-West axis illustrate <strong>the</strong><br />

situation which prevailed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>ce; cf. <strong>the</strong> analysis<br />

proposed <strong>in</strong> Hatzopoulos-Loukopoulou, Two Studies 62­<br />

100.<br />

6. On <strong>the</strong> Colonia ClaudiaAprensis, see L. Loukopoulou,<br />

'"Colonia ClaudiaAprensis', μία ρωμαϊκή αποικία στην<br />

νοτιοανατολική Θράκη", ΜνήμηΔ. Λαζαρίδη, Πόλιςκαί<br />

χώρα στην αρχαία Μακεδονία και Θράκη, 9-11 Μαΐου<br />

1986 (Thessalonikel990) 701-715.<br />

7. The lists are published <strong>in</strong> Hatzopoulos-Loukopoulou,<br />

Recherches 187-94, nos. K9-K12.<br />

8. Hatzopoulos-Loukopoulou, Recherches 190, no. K9<br />

l<strong>in</strong>eDlOO.<br />

9. Hatzopoulos-Loukopoulou, Recherches I 91, no. Κ<br />

11 A1-2. Cf. op. cit. 84, no. K6: Φλαουΐα Μύστα.<br />

10. Hatzopoulos-Loukopoulou, Recherches I 90 , no.<br />

K9D95.<br />

11. Hatzopoulos-Loukopoulou, Recherches I 89 (K9<br />

C70: Μ. 'Αντώνιος Λόνγος); I 89 (K9 C69: Κόϊντος<br />

Κάσσιος Σεκοΰνδος); I 88 (Κ9 Β24: Λ. Ιούλιος Κέλερ<br />

Κέλερος); 188 (no Κ9 Β25: Γ. Ιούλιος Πρόκλος, υιοί); Ι<br />

90 (Κ9 D97: Σέξτος Ιούλιος Πρόκλος).<br />

12.Hatzopoulos-Loukopoulou, Recherches I 89 (Β56:<br />

Caecilii); 193 (Κ 11 D61 : Cottii); 193 (Κ 11 D65: Maesiior<br />

Messii); 194 (Κ 12.21 : Statuii); 189 (K9 C68: Sulpicii, [cf.<br />

ibidem, no. K9 D90: Σουλπάς]); 194 (K12.14: Terentii);<br />

192 (Kll B21 -.Tessidii).<br />

13. Hatzopoulos-Loukopoulou, Recherches I 92 (Kl 1<br />

C45: Bruttif); I 92 (Kl 1 Β17: Herennii); I 92 (Kl 1 B20:<br />

Rennif); I 92 (K12. 12: Rhodii); I 92 (K9 C63: Scanii).<br />

14. Hatzopoulos-Loukopoulou, Recherchesl59-60, no.<br />

A14 (Anthémonte).<br />

15. Hatzopoulos-Loukopoulou, Recherches 160-61, no.<br />

A15 1-3 et 9-11 (Anthémonte).<br />

16. D. Samsaris, "Ή ρωμαϊκή αποικία της Κασσανδρείας",<br />

Δωδώνη 16 (1987) 353-433.<br />

17. Hatzopoulos-Loukopoulou, Recherches 1, 77-80,<br />

no. Κ2; on <strong>the</strong> statue of Cesar, see ibidem, with plates<br />

XXXIII-XXXV.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!