01.07.2013 Views

Free PDF Download - Montaigne Studies - University of Chicago

Free PDF Download - Montaigne Studies - University of Chicago

Free PDF Download - Montaigne Studies - University of Chicago

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Montaigne</strong>'s Aesthetics <strong>of</strong> Seduction 79<br />

tousjours chez soy; moins il se pique et passionne au jeu, il le conduict<br />

d'autant plus avantageusement et seurement" (III, 10, 986 B).<br />

We could cite the first sentence <strong>of</strong> "De mesnager sa volonté" as the<br />

anagram generating the entire essay and linking it most convincingly to<br />

seduction aesthetics: "Au pris du commun des hommes, peu de choses<br />

me touchent, ou, pour mieux dire, me tiennent; car c'est raison<br />

qu'elles touchent, pourveu qu'elles ne nous possedent" (III, 10, 980<br />

B). In other words: actio in distans. Through the willful creation <strong>of</strong><br />

distance and ritual (i.e. Game Theory), through a conscious<br />

differentiation between epiderm and foy, the political/erotic subject<br />

avoids loss <strong>of</strong> self possession. He is continuously aware <strong>of</strong> his<br />

position vis-à-vis the Other. Like Sabina Poppæa, he defines himself<br />

by his hyper-consciousness <strong>of</strong> his symbolic positioning, thus creating<br />

the possibility <strong>of</strong> engaging the Other without ever relinquishing<br />

control.<br />

***<br />

My discussion has concentrated on <strong>Montaigne</strong>'s construction <strong>of</strong><br />

an interactional model <strong>of</strong> behavior. Starting with the notion <strong>of</strong> desire<br />

and its displacement to the aesthetic realm, I attempted to show how a<br />

logic <strong>of</strong> seduction can be an important analytical tool in understanding<br />

<strong>Montaigne</strong>'s construction <strong>of</strong> an ethics <strong>of</strong> engagement where the Moi is<br />

protected from its own unbridled passions. Obviously this highly<br />

volunteeristic model <strong>of</strong> behavior is open to multiple deconstructions<br />

from psychoanalytical and feminist points <strong>of</strong> view. My interest here,<br />

however, was to posit seduction as a paradigm in <strong>Montaigne</strong>'s<br />

construction and representation <strong>of</strong> himself.<br />

As to <strong>Montaigne</strong>'s rhetorical opposition between Seneca and<br />

Ovid, I would suggest that, far from being an anti-Stoic move,<br />

seduction aesthetics and its application and implication to the issues <strong>of</strong><br />

identity, sexuality and politics, adopt in fact Senecan precepts à la<br />

lettre. Seneca writes to Lucilius: "For after I have issued my<br />

prohibition against the desires, I shall still allow you to wish that you<br />

may do the same things fearlessly and with greater accuracy <strong>of</strong><br />

judgment, and to tell the pleasures more than before." 26 Clearly, then,<br />

26 Seneca, Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales (Cambridge: Harvard <strong>University</strong><br />

Press, Loeb Classical Library, 1925), III, p. 333.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!