07.08.2014 Views

variabilité interannuelle et tendances. Comparaison aux ... - LMD

variabilité interannuelle et tendances. Comparaison aux ... - LMD

variabilité interannuelle et tendances. Comparaison aux ... - LMD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42<br />

CHAPITRE 3. L’EAU CONTINENTALE VUE PAR L’ALTIMÉTRIE SPATIALE ET<br />

PAR ORCHIDEE<br />

80°N<br />

80°N<br />

40°N<br />

40°N<br />

0°<br />

0°<br />

40°S<br />

40°S<br />

80°S<br />

80°S<br />

100°W<br />

0° 100°E<br />

100°W 0° 100°E<br />

0 1<br />

(a) AMIP simulation<br />

2 4 6 8 10 12<br />

(b) CRU observations<br />

FIG. 3.9 – Global mean value of land precipitation from 1979 to 1999. (a) AMIP simulation. (b)<br />

CRU observation. Units in mm d −1 .<br />

<strong>et</strong> al. (1999). To estimate the seasonal signal over 1997 and 1998, the sea level time series have<br />

been d<strong>et</strong>rended. The positive trend, amounting 3 mm yr −1 over the 1993-2003, mostly results<br />

from warming of the world ocean plus mountain glacier and ice she<strong>et</strong>s melting (Cazenave and<br />

Nerem, 2004).<br />

To correct for thermal expansion (also called steric effect), we used historical data of ocean<br />

subsurface temperature made recently available by Ishii <strong>et</strong> al. (2003). This data s<strong>et</strong> consists of<br />

monthly 1 ◦ × 1 ◦ gridded ocean temperatures and associated uncertainties, down to 500 m for<br />

1950-1998. It has been derived from objective analysis m<strong>et</strong>hods applied to the raw temperature<br />

data (see Ishii <strong>et</strong> al. (2003) for a d<strong>et</strong>ailed description of the data).<br />

To estimate the steric sea level for a given month, we computed density change with respect<br />

to a reference density at any level and grid point according to the classical expression in which<br />

the density is obtained in a sequence of steps (Gill, 1982).<br />

Figure 3.10a and 3.10b show d<strong>et</strong>rended T/P sea level, steric correction and residual signal<br />

(T/P sea level minus steric effect) for 1997 and 1998, respectively.<br />

Comparing Figure 3.10a and 3.10b indicates that the annual mean sea level is significantly<br />

different over the two years, with smaller amplitude in 1998 compared to 1997. On the other<br />

hand, the steric component, although not being exactly similar, shows less amplitude variation.<br />

As a consequence the residual signal exhibits strong difference b<strong>et</strong>ween the two years.<br />

For 1997, the residual signal has an amplitude of 12 mm, with minima occurring in April and<br />

maxima occurring in September. For 1998, it has an amplitude of 6 mm, with the minima in May<br />

and the maxima in September. The variability b<strong>et</strong>ween the two years seems sufficiently large and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!