SURPRISING TEXTILES, DESIGN & ART - exhibitions international
SURPRISING TEXTILES, DESIGN & ART - exhibitions international
SURPRISING TEXTILES, DESIGN & ART - exhibitions international
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
BIofacturE 2050 BIofacturE 2050E<br />
Tizziani et Baldizzone<br />
how dId wE gEt thErE?<br />
More than a decade ago, we developed the knowledge<br />
to produce biopolymers fibres made from<br />
corn, crab shell, and even milk. These were produced<br />
from natural raw materials enhanced by<br />
chemical manipulations. Then, came the spider<br />
goat, produced by Nexia BioTechnology, a goat<br />
genetically re-engineered with a spider gene. The<br />
intention there was to use the milk from that<br />
goat to produce a biopolymer fibre with some of<br />
the characteristics of a spider silk. A spider can<br />
produce a biodegrable [biodegradable] fibre six<br />
times stronger than Kevlar at ambient temperature,<br />
without toxic chemical by-products or energy<br />
hungry machinery. So spiders have become<br />
a symbolic inspiring model of nature, and for decades<br />
now scientists have attempted to reproduce<br />
spider silk artificially. Synthetic biology has just<br />
taken this quest a step further. All of this is now<br />
possible because we can combine the language of<br />
DNA sequencing (A, C, T, G) with the 1s and 0s of<br />
computer programming. In terms of textiles, we<br />
are familiar with Computer Aided Design (CAD),<br />
and Computer Aided Manufacture (CAM). 21st<br />
century technology has now enabled us to enter<br />
the next phase: Computer Aided Biofacture (CAB)<br />
or computer programmable biological ‘manufacturing’.<br />
12<br />
whErE do wE go from thErE?<br />
Synthetic biology has the potential to radically<br />
disrupt our design and manufacturing models.<br />
This is not science fiction: these so called synthetic<br />
bacteria and plants are still in science<br />
labs, but they are being developed rapidly and<br />
benefit from massive injection of public and<br />
private funding. So what about the ethical dimension<br />
of such extreme technology? Some argue<br />
that in the current ecological crisis, living<br />
technology can enable us to produce more sustainable<br />
materials at ambient temperatures,<br />
without using harsh chemicals and generating<br />
toxic by-products. But until 2010 we had never<br />
created a technology that had the capacity to<br />
self-replicate. Can we really be in control of<br />
these new living organisms, or have we opened<br />
Pandora’s box? And what becomes of the designer<br />
in a future where everything is reduced<br />
to programmable coding, even the living?<br />
●<br />
Carole Collet,<br />
Reader In Textile Futures, TFRC, Central Saint Martins College,<br />
University of the Arts London.<br />
13