journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
In Search <strong>of</strong> the Greatest Common Denominator 81<br />
Undoubtedly, it was the clear stance <strong>of</strong> Brandt in favour <strong>of</strong> the enlargement issue<br />
that encouraged Pompidou to yield at that point in time. The chancellor clearly<br />
exerted greater pressure on France than his pre<strong>de</strong>cessor Kiesinger had done. Since<br />
the beginning <strong>of</strong> July the still Foreign minister openly discussed the sensitive issue<br />
<strong>of</strong> surplus production and – in doing so – subtly left Pompidou in doubt as to the<br />
German assent to the <strong>de</strong>finite ruling <strong>of</strong> financing the agricultural market.<br />
Furthermore, acting as a conciliator between the extreme attitu<strong>de</strong>s <strong>of</strong> France on the<br />
one hand and the Benelux on the other, Brandt clearly <strong>de</strong>monstrated his esprit<br />
communautaire and thus gave his policy high credibility. In doing so, he succee<strong>de</strong>d<br />
in taking German national interests into consi<strong>de</strong>ration without jeopardising the<br />
relationship to the French and British allies.<br />
If there were any conceptions about the long-term effects <strong>of</strong> the conference,<br />
they certainly were not completely outlined at this stage. Though the EMU had<br />
played a prominent role in the German drafts, its future <strong>de</strong>velopment and failure in<br />
the early Seventies were not foreseeable. It is true <strong>of</strong> course, that the German<br />
administration was a bit naive in assuming that Germany would follow through on<br />
its ‘economist’ approach as opposed to the ‘monetary’ approach which Pompidou<br />
and several other member states had adopted.<br />
The European Political Cooperation, however, would emerge with a promising<br />
future, although it took a marginal position on <strong>de</strong>cisions regarding the preparations<br />
for the conference. It was “a few lines tucked away” in the final communiqué. 94<br />
However, the Davignon report <strong>of</strong> October 1970 established the framework for a<br />
common foreign policy with the European Political Cooperation (EPC). It was a<br />
sort <strong>of</strong> alternative route (“zweiten Gleises”) outsi<strong>de</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Rome Treaties that,<br />
together with the entry <strong>of</strong> Great Britain, Denmark and Ireland, helped in setting the<br />
<strong>de</strong>cisive course for further <strong>de</strong>velopment <strong>of</strong> Western European co-operation in the<br />
Seventies. 95<br />
Finally, the Hague summit had set a prece<strong>de</strong>nt for the European Council, which<br />
would convene regularly from 1975, in helping to institutionalise the summit<br />
conferences which had initially been rejected. But obviously, the Hague summit<br />
was a success worth repeating. It facilitated the work <strong>of</strong> EC institutions such as the<br />
Committee <strong>of</strong> Permanent Representatives, which had been blocked in 1969 for lack<br />
<strong>of</strong> political gui<strong>de</strong>lines by their governments. 96 In the case <strong>of</strong> the Hague summit,<br />
Brandt’s search for the greatest common <strong>de</strong>nominator had resulted in a <strong>de</strong>cisive<br />
step forward in the European <strong>integration</strong> process, a procedure which normally<br />
moves at a snail’s pace.<br />
94. C. HILL, K.E. SMITH, European Foreign Policy: key documents, Routledge, London/New York,<br />
2000, p.72.<br />
95. K. D. BRACHER, W. JÄGER, W. LINK, Republik im Wan<strong>de</strong>l 1969-1974. Die Ära Brandt, DVA/<br />
Brockhaus, Stuttgart/Mannheim, 1986, p.243.<br />
96. PAAA, Referat I A 1, 1440, Bericht <strong>de</strong>s Ausschusses <strong>de</strong>r Ständigen Vertreter, 24.11.1969 and the<br />
commentary statement <strong>of</strong> the German Foreign Office from 26 November.