download - Nederlands Oogheelkundig Gezelschap
download - Nederlands Oogheelkundig Gezelschap
download - Nederlands Oogheelkundig Gezelschap
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• Primary Guides:<br />
◦ Was the assignment of patients to treatments randomized?<br />
◦ Were all patients who entered the trial properly accounted for and attributed at its conclusion?<br />
◦ Was follow-up complete?<br />
◦ Were patients analyzed in the groups to which they were randomized?<br />
• Secondary Guides:<br />
◦ Were patients, health workers, and study personnel "blind" to treatment?<br />
◦ Were the groups similar at the start of the trial?<br />
◦ Aside from the experimental intervention, were the groups treated equally?<br />
II. What were the results?<br />
• How large was the treatment effect?<br />
• How precise was the estimate of the treatment effect?<br />
III. Will the results help me in caring for my patients?<br />
• Can the results be applied to my patient care?<br />
• Were all clinically important outcomes considered?<br />
• Are the likely treatment benefits worth the potential harms and costs?<br />
Artikel over diagnostische test<br />
. Are the results in the study valid?<br />
• Primary Guides<br />
◦ Was there an independent, blind comparison with a reference standard?<br />
◦ Did the patient sample include an appropriate spectrum of patients to whom the diagnostic test will be applied<br />
in clinical practice?<br />
• Secondary G<br />
◦ Did the results of the test being evaluated influence the decision to perform the reference standard?<br />
◦ Were the methods for performing the test described in sufficient detail to permit replication?<br />
II. What are the results?<br />
• Are likelihood ratios for the test results presented or data necessary for their calculation provided?<br />
III. Will the results help me in caring for my patients?<br />
• Will the reproducibility of the test result and its interpretation be satisfactory in my setting?<br />
• Are the results applicable to my patient?<br />
• Will the results change my management?<br />
• Will patients be better off as a result of the test?<br />
Artikel over kwaliteit van leven<br />
I. Are the recommendations valid?<br />
• Primary Guides<br />
1. Have the investigators measured aspects of patients' lives that patients consider important?<br />
2. Did the HRQL instruments work in the way they are supposed to?<br />
• Secondary Guides<br />
3. Are there important aspects of HRQL that have been omitted?<br />
4. If there were tradeoffs between quality and quantity of life, or an economic evaluation, have they used the right<br />
measures?<br />
II. What are the results?<br />
1. What was the magnitude of effect on HRQL?<br />
III. Will the results help me in caring for my patients?<br />
1. Will the information from the study help me inform my patients?<br />
2. Did the study design simulate clinical practice?<br />
Opleidingsplan oogheelkunde Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis 2012<br />
28
Change language