19.04.2013 Views

Teorias de Mudança de Crenças (Dinâmica Doxástica) - IFCS

Teorias de Mudança de Crenças (Dinâmica Doxástica) - IFCS

Teorias de Mudança de Crenças (Dinâmica Doxástica) - IFCS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A possible explanation:<br />

Justificação epistêmica<br />

Thomas Kuhn (The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 1970) has presented a theory<br />

of belief changes (theory changes). According to that theory large scale belief changes<br />

– paradigm shifts – do not bow to rational control. (Though Kuhn also asserted that<br />

changes within a paradigm are largely governed by the methodological rules of that<br />

paradigm.)<br />

• Kuhn’s theory (sufficiently vulgarized) has enforced for <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s relativistic ten<strong>de</strong>ncies<br />

in philosophy and – even more so – in neighbouring disciplines. Such ten<strong>de</strong>ncies are<br />

rarely shared by epistemologists.<br />

· Belief changes, on the one hand, appeared un<strong>de</strong>r the Kuhnian perspective as rationally<br />

impredictable and not subject to normative contraints.<br />

· Most epistemologists agreed that knowledge claims, on the other hand and to the<br />

contrary, are subject to rational assessment.<br />

• Consequence: The static problem remained within traditional epistemology; the dynamic<br />

problem – together with its relativistic si<strong>de</strong> effects – was exiled to the History<br />

of Science.<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!