04.11.2014 Views

No 13 - Journal of Social Informatics / Revista de Informatica Sociala

No 13 - Journal of Social Informatics / Revista de Informatica Sociala

No 13 - Journal of Social Informatics / Revista de Informatica Sociala

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1. TWITTER AS A CROSSOVER COMBINING MOBILE TELEPHONY AND THE<br />

WORLD WIDE WEB<br />

As the two most spectacular and influential technological <strong>de</strong>velopments <strong>of</strong> the last fifteen<br />

years, mobile telephony and the Internet have both contributed to a significant empowerment <strong>of</strong><br />

individuals: enabling them to engage in highly self-<strong>de</strong>termined communication irrespective <strong>of</strong> time<br />

and space, without any special skills and efforts nee<strong>de</strong>d and in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>ntly <strong>of</strong> any institutional<br />

affiliations. The prospective fusion <strong>of</strong> these highly complementary thriving technologies opens a<br />

perspective for many additional innovations by combining functionalities that have hitherto been<br />

separated.<br />

Twitter represents such a hybrid by allowing Short Messages (<strong>of</strong> 140 characters or less) to<br />

be exchanged over the Net. Thus<br />

"combining the flexibility <strong>of</strong> bilateral mobile phone SMS by with<br />

the immediacy <strong>of</strong> Instant Messaging and the multilateral social networking<br />

potentialities <strong>of</strong> the Wolrd Wi<strong>de</strong> Web."<br />

(Osborne 2008)<br />

Given the small size <strong>of</strong> the messages, they need low bandwidth and can be sent from<br />

anywhere and received at any place and by any channel <strong>of</strong> communication: Phone, Email, IM, RSS<br />

or the Web.<br />

Like a telephone network, Twitter is a highly user-gui<strong>de</strong>d service that does not need many<br />

formal gui<strong>de</strong>lines, rules, supervision and administration. In fact, the users themselves create the<br />

rules. e. g. by <strong>de</strong>ciding collectively to use the @ sign for marking messages <strong>de</strong>termined to go<br />

directly to a specific receiver, or by using hash tags (#) for sorting out tweets according to<br />

referenced objects, topics <strong>of</strong> persons. (Stamatiou et. al. 2008: 15).<br />

Similarly, there is almost no need for mo<strong>de</strong>rators, gate keepers or other formal managing<br />

roles, and also very little need for instruction manuals, because the small amount knowledge and<br />

skills nee<strong>de</strong>d for usage are well transmitted horizontally from more experienced users to "Newbies"<br />

(Stamatiou et. al. 2008: 16).<br />

By <strong>de</strong>fault, my messages are public, so that anybody with a Twitter account may become<br />

my "follower" by subscribing to my updates. And I may in turn follow anybody else regularly by<br />

setting him or her on my list. In Settings Account I can chose to "protect" updates, which means<br />

that people can see my messages ("Tweets) only with my approval.<br />

Originating in March 2006, Twitter has experienced spectacular growth recently:<br />

particularly in the year 2008 during which the number <strong>of</strong> active users has more than tripled (to<br />

about 5 Mio) and the number <strong>of</strong> unique visitors has risen from 0.5 Mio to 3.5 Mio per month. (Hub-<br />

Spot 2008: 3).<br />

2. BOTTOM UP LEADERSHIP-FOLLOWER PATTERNS<br />

In contrast to the horizontal, egalitarian friendship networks that arise in <strong>Social</strong> Network<br />

Sites like MySpace, Facebook or LinkedIn, we see the emergence <strong>of</strong> highly asymmetric verticalized<br />

lea<strong>de</strong>r-follower patterns (Niles 2009). While this also inclu<strong>de</strong>s reciprocal and transitive or circular<br />

patterns (like A > B > C > A), unilateral relationships are highly predominant. This is manifested in<br />

the highly skewed frequency distributions <strong>of</strong> followers: about 35% having 10 or less people<br />

following, while 0.2% possesses more than 2500 (HubSpot 2008: 6).<br />

Irrespective <strong>of</strong> such configurations, followers choose lea<strong>de</strong>rs not because <strong>of</strong> love and social<br />

nearness, but because they provi<strong>de</strong> useful information.<br />

The focus is not on the person as an integral human being, but only on specific qualities <strong>of</strong> a<br />

user that are manifested in his or her ongoing communications. Thus, to end communications<br />

pag. 6: <strong>Revista</strong> <strong>de</strong> Informatică <strong>Social</strong>ă | Vol. III (<strong>13</strong>) / 2010 | ISSN 1584-384X

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!