ÛÙ¹ Ø¢Ûئ اکج٠اÙÚÙÙٹس Ú Ø³Ù¹Ù Ø§ÙسÛÛس اÙØ´Û Ø¬Ø±ÛÙÙ - ti college rabwah
ÛÙ¹ Ø¢Ûئ اکج٠اÙÚÙÙٹس Ú Ø³Ù¹Ù Ø§ÙسÛÛس اÙØ´Û Ø¬Ø±ÛÙÙ - ti college rabwah
ÛÙ¹ Ø¢Ûئ اکج٠اÙÚÙÙٹس Ú Ø³Ù¹Ù Ø§ÙسÛÛس اÙØ´Û Ø¬Ø±ÛÙÙ - ti college rabwah
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ALMANAR<br />
December 2012<br />
A taste of the Past<br />
URDU<br />
Mubashar A. Solangi<br />
B.Sc. II<br />
Now Urdu, dear friends, I am sure you’ll agree<br />
Is the easiest language there ever could be.<br />
The grammar is simple, excep<strong>ti</strong>ons are rare,<br />
And only the spelling requires a little care.<br />
In English the letters are just six and twenty<br />
And that I should say is certainly plenty.<br />
But in Urdu we have some nine letters more,<br />
And they too are not needed, I am sure.<br />
Now let us examine the letter and see,<br />
Just how many there really need to be.<br />
,ت , we have also got ٹ Let us start with<br />
So why ط is needed, I really can’t say.<br />
And why should the number of sح be two,<br />
When common sense says one ح would do.<br />
word, I am sure is quite a nice محبوبہ<br />
But why not مھبوبہ It seem absurd.<br />
And why does Urdu need three kinds of “S”,<br />
Which makes the learner merely to guess.<br />
, س or simply ث or ص If it is<br />
It makes it tougher than if it never had been.<br />
And ض is a letter which causes dismay,<br />
, ز were just ض How easy would it be if<br />
For ظ and ض and ذ seem to be,<br />
A needless headache as all must agree.<br />
, ح and ط So if we get rid of both<br />
, ث , and ص , and ظ , ذ , ض<br />
Then the spelling in Urdu I’m sure you agree,<br />
Would present no more pain for you and me.<br />
(Taken from Al-Manar January- March 1969)<br />
4