08.10.2016 Views

Foundations of Data Science

2dLYwbK

2dLYwbK

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

0 1 2 3<br />

4 12 20<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> resistors<br />

in parallel<br />

· · ·<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

Figure 5.9: 2-dimensional lattice along with the linear network resulting from shorting<br />

resistors on the concentric squares about the origin.<br />

Three dimensions<br />

In three dimensions, the resistance along any path to infinity grows to infinity but<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> paths in parallel also grows to infinity. It turns out there are a sufficient<br />

number <strong>of</strong> paths that r eff remains finite and thus there is a nonzero escape probability.<br />

We will prove this now. First note that shorting any edge decreases the resistance, so<br />

we do not use shorting in this pro<strong>of</strong>, since we seek to prove an upper bound on the<br />

resistance. Instead we remove some edges, which increases their resistance to infinity and<br />

hence increases the effective resistance, giving an upper bound. To simplify things we<br />

consider walks on on quadrant rather than the full grid. The resistance to infinity derived<br />

from only the quadrant is an upper bound on the resistance <strong>of</strong> the full grid.<br />

The construction used in three dimensions is easier to explain first in two dimensions.<br />

Draw dotted diagonal lines at x + y = 2 n − 1. Consider two paths that start at the origin.<br />

One goes up and the other goes to the right. Each time a path encounters a dotted<br />

diagonal line, split the path into two, one which goes right and the other up. Where<br />

two paths cross, split the vertex into two, keeping the paths separate. By a symmetry<br />

argument, splitting the vertex does not change the resistance <strong>of</strong> the network. Remove<br />

all resistors except those on these paths. The resistance <strong>of</strong> the original network is less<br />

than that <strong>of</strong> the tree produced by this process since removing a resistor is equivalent to<br />

increasing its resistance to infinity.<br />

The distances between splits increase and are 1, 2, 4, etc. At each split the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> paths in parallel doubles. See Figure 5.11. Thus, the resistance to infinity in this two<br />

173

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!