20.02.2013 Views

EXPLORER special on generation - LBD-Beratungsgesellschaft mbH

EXPLORER special on generation - LBD-Beratungsgesellschaft mbH

EXPLORER special on generation - LBD-Beratungsgesellschaft mbH

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SPECIAL<br />

GW<br />

140<br />

130<br />

120<br />

1 1 0<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

1 0<br />

0<br />

figure 5: Power plants of German TSOs and plants under c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>. The plants and the load in the transmissi<strong>on</strong> grid<br />

are used as a basis for comparis<strong>on</strong> because they are competing <strong>on</strong> the wholesale market in order to cover the load of<br />

must-run power plants for EEG and cogenerati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the lower grid levels. Sources: Platts 2009; <strong>LBD</strong> analyses, as per:<br />

30 November 2010.<br />

GW<br />

60<br />

55<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

1 5<br />

1 0<br />

5<br />

0<br />

87,3 14,6<br />

installed net bottleneck capacity Capacity under c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong><br />

installed: Nuclear energy installed: Lignite<br />

installed: Hard coal, old installed: Hard coal, new<br />

installed: Gas installed: Hydro<br />

installed: Others under c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong><br />

0 1.000 2.000 3.000 4.000 5.000 6.000 7.000 8.000<br />

annual load durati<strong>on</strong> curve of vertical load 2008<br />

annual load durati<strong>on</strong> curve of vertical load 12.2009/11.2010<br />

by load sorted hours per year<br />

Year Vertical grid load Work Full use time<br />

2008 12–56 GW 343.7 TWh 6,139 h<br />

2010 13–55 GW 323.3 TWh 5,870 h<br />

difference ø 2.32 gW 20.4 TWh 269 h<br />

figure 6: Comparis<strong>on</strong> of vertical grid load in 2008 and 2010 (past 12 m<strong>on</strong>ths); sources: 50Hertz, Tennet, Ampri<strong>on</strong>, EnBW;<br />

as per: 30 November 2010.<br />

4<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>EXPLORER</str<strong>on</strong>g> markttrends<br />

December 2010<br />

Lbd-beratungsgesellschaft<br />

latest-generati<strong>on</strong> coal-fired power plants<br />

(efficiency of approx. 45 %) generate a c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong><br />

margin of around 80 euro per kW<br />

p.a. New c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> projects are entering<br />

a hard-fought market, there is no sign of the<br />

required c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> margins for full costs<br />

of between 220 and 250 euro per kW p.a.,<br />

an ec<strong>on</strong>omic fiasco in the years to come<br />

seems certain.<br />

Over-capacity feed-in into the transmissi<strong>on</strong><br />

grid calls for 22,000 mW to<br />

be shut down<br />

This is due to significant overcapacity<br />

combined with a steep increase in feed-in<br />

from regenerative power plants. Figure 5<br />

shows installed power capacity (around<br />

87,300 MW) and power plant capacity<br />

under c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> (around 14,600 MW).<br />

The analy sis is limited to feed-in <strong>on</strong> transmissi<strong>on</strong><br />

grid level. This power capacity is<br />

opposed to demand (vertical grid load) of<br />

55,000 to 60,000 MW.<br />

This ultimately means that over the next<br />

two years, installed power capacity of<br />

80,000 (- x) MW will have to be reduced,<br />

i.e. around 22,000 MW will have to be shut<br />

down. Such a volume of shut-downs will<br />

mean an additi<strong>on</strong>al loss of power <strong>on</strong> the<br />

market for the big producers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!