22.02.2013 Views

RESEARCH FOR

RESEARCH FOR

RESEARCH FOR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ECONOMIC CALCULATION OF SHORT<br />

ROTATION WILLOW PLANTATIONS IN LATVIA<br />

Average yield in<br />

willow plantations,<br />

ODT ha -1 year -1<br />

changes in costs according to average yield in willow plantations,%<br />

Changes of IRR<br />

Changes of<br />

harvesting costs<br />

Changes of<br />

transportation cost<br />

Table 2<br />

Accumulated changes<br />

of cash flow<br />

8 -<br />

- -<br />

9 +10.5 -<br />

+12.8 +23.9<br />

10 +20.5 +25.0 +47.9<br />

11 +28.1<br />

+37.8 +65.9<br />

12 +36.8 +16.4<br />

+50.0 +89.8<br />

13 +45.6 +62.8 +113.8<br />

14 +52.0<br />

+75.0 +131.8<br />

15 +60.2 +32.9<br />

+87.8 +155.7<br />

16 +68.4 +100.6 +179.7<br />

Source: authors calculations based on EcoWillow model.<br />

Figure 4. Accumulate cash flow changes of willow plantation, according to biomass price changes, where all<br />

other variables are the same.<br />

Source: the author’s drawing according to EcoWillow model calculation.<br />

Increase of fuel costs by 0.75 LVL L -1 or by<br />

50% (from 0.75 LVL L -1 to 1.5 LVL L -1 ) will raise<br />

the planting costs by 1.5% (from 695 LVL ha -1 to<br />

705 LVL ha -1 ), the harvesting costs will increase<br />

by 30.9% (from 152 LVL ha -1 to 199 LVL ha -1 ) and<br />

transporting costs – by 29.2% (from 164 LVL ha -1 to<br />

212 LVL ha -1 ). The fuel costs plays a significant role<br />

in harvesting and transportation; similarly, other costs<br />

like cutting price, ploughing and trailer costs will rise,<br />

because of the use of fuel in all of these activities.<br />

In some cases financial support in establishment<br />

stage is an important factor to make a choice in<br />

favour of willow plantations instead of not using the<br />

abandoned agricultural land. The first earnings are<br />

possible only after the first harvest; therefore, a single<br />

establishment grant for the willow plantation would<br />

make them more attractive to farmers and move the<br />

payback to the first harvest. The establishment grant<br />

should be 50% of the establishment costs to make<br />

positive cash flow after the first harvest. In the standard<br />

scenario if the establishment grant is 400 LVL ha -1 , the<br />

Kristaps Makovskis, Dagnija Lazdiņa, Ligita Bite<br />

payback is reached after the first harvest and the IRR<br />

will increase by 62% (from 17.1% to 27.7%).<br />

conclusions<br />

The costs of willow plantation include positions<br />

from different sectors (plantation establishment,<br />

harvesting and transport). Increase or decrease of<br />

the costs in a particular sector leads to changes in<br />

the plantation cash flow during plantation lifespan.<br />

Standard model for plantation of 10 ha area and<br />

lifespan 22 years is provided in the study. In standard<br />

scenario IRR is 17.1%, NPV is 1,099 LVL and the<br />

payback is reached in the 9 th year or after the second<br />

harvesting. The establishment costs in the first year<br />

are 739 LVL ha -1 ; harvesting costs in the first harvest<br />

are 152 LVL ha -1 and transport costs of wood chip are<br />

164 LVL ha -1 . Major part of the costs is establishment<br />

(33%), harvesting (26%) and transportation (29%);<br />

all remaining costs taken together constitute 12% of<br />

the total production costs. If the costs of land rise<br />

by 50% (to 12 LVL ha -1 ) the land cost and taxes in<br />

228 ReseaRch foR RuRal Development 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!