23.02.2013 Views

Time for eULeX To prioriTize war crimes - Amnesty International ...

Time for eULeX To prioriTize war crimes - Amnesty International ...

Time for eULeX To prioriTize war crimes - Amnesty International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Kosovo: <strong>Time</strong> <strong>for</strong> EULEX to prioritize <strong>war</strong> <strong>crimes</strong> 21<br />

8. MEASURES TO PRIORITIZE THE<br />

INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION<br />

OF WAR CRIMES CASES<br />

<strong>Amnesty</strong> <strong>International</strong> calls on the Council of the European Union, in their consideration of<br />

EULEX’s mandate <strong>for</strong> 2012-14, to ensure that the investigation and prosecution of <strong>war</strong><br />

<strong>crimes</strong> is established as a priority <strong>for</strong> EULEX. In the preceding chapters <strong>Amnesty</strong><br />

<strong>International</strong> summarised the progress made by EULEX in the investigation of <strong>war</strong> <strong>crimes</strong><br />

cases, but identified how this fell far short of that required to address not only the backlog of<br />

UNMIK legacy cases, but the full extent of <strong>crimes</strong> under international law which took place<br />

in Kosovo.<br />

In this section of the report <strong>Amnesty</strong> <strong>International</strong> makes a series of recommendations which<br />

the organization considers will ensure that EULEX is provided with the personnel, and<br />

resources needed to properly investigate and prosecute at least all outstanding <strong>war</strong> <strong>crimes</strong><br />

cases. Later in the report, the organization makes recommendations <strong>for</strong> the continued<br />

prosecution of such <strong>crimes</strong>, so that impunity is no longer allowed to persist.<br />

In October 2011, Bernard Rabatel, Deputy Head of the Justice component told <strong>Amnesty</strong><br />

<strong>International</strong> that EULEX’s objective was to try most of the <strong>war</strong> <strong>crimes</strong> cases: “Although <strong>war</strong><br />

<strong>crimes</strong> have been de-prioritized to some extent, they are still a priority <strong>for</strong> us … we [just] also<br />

prioritized organized crime and corruption”. However, in interviews conducted in 2010 and<br />

in July 2011, EULEX officials in Brussels in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>Amnesty</strong> <strong>International</strong> that the<br />

prosecution of <strong>war</strong> <strong>crimes</strong> was not one of EULEX’s priorities.<br />

Calls <strong>for</strong> the prioritization of <strong>war</strong> crime prosecutions have previously been made by <strong>Amnesty</strong><br />

<strong>International</strong>, the UN Human Rights Committee, the Organization <strong>for</strong> Security and Cooperation<br />

(OSCE) Mission in Kosovo and the Humanitarian Law Centre – Kosovo. 55 <strong>Amnesty</strong><br />

<strong>International</strong> also understands that that some prosecutors and others within EULEX would<br />

also have preferred to see a stronger emphasis on the prosecution of <strong>war</strong> <strong>crimes</strong>.<br />

8.1 INCREASE THE NUMBER OF INTERNATIONAL EULEX WAR CRIMES POLICE,<br />

PROSECUTORS AND JUDICIARY<br />

<strong>Amnesty</strong> <strong>International</strong> considers that the number of EULEX personnel dedicated to the<br />

investigation and prosecution of <strong>war</strong> <strong>crimes</strong> is inadequate to the number of outstanding<br />

cases. Investigations and trials have continued to be delayed in the absence of sufficient<br />

international police, judges and prosecutors.<br />

EULEX War Crimes Investigation Unit has the capacity to conclude, on average, two or three<br />

cases per year. Only two of the 10 EULEX prosecutors within the SPRK are dedicated to the<br />

investigation and prosecution of <strong>war</strong> <strong>crimes</strong>. Further, out of 51 international judges, only four<br />

adjudicate in <strong>war</strong> <strong>crimes</strong> trials.<br />

Index: EUR 70/004/2012 <strong>Amnesty</strong> <strong>International</strong> April 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!