23.02.2013 Views

Time for eULeX To prioriTize war crimes - Amnesty International ...

Time for eULeX To prioriTize war crimes - Amnesty International ...

Time for eULeX To prioriTize war crimes - Amnesty International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Kosovo: <strong>Time</strong> <strong>for</strong> EULEX to prioritize <strong>war</strong> <strong>crimes</strong> 3<br />

In June 2012, the Council of the European Union will approve the extension of the mandate<br />

of the EU-led rule of law mission in Kosovo, (EULEX). In this report, <strong>Amnesty</strong> <strong>International</strong><br />

advocates that the new mandate should include specific measures to ensure that EULEX, as<br />

a matter of urgency, prioritizes the investigation and prosecution of <strong>crimes</strong> under<br />

international law, including <strong>war</strong> <strong>crimes</strong> and <strong>crimes</strong> against humanity.<br />

<strong>Amnesty</strong> <strong>International</strong> is a<strong>war</strong>e that over the next two years the EULEX mission will be<br />

reconfigured, and that the mission will down-size, and withdraw personnel from the police<br />

and customs sectors, leaving the mission to focus on the justice system. <strong>Amnesty</strong><br />

<strong>International</strong> considers that this is an ideal opportunity to strengthen both the international<br />

and local components of the justice sector, and in so doing, provide the resources and<br />

personnel needed to effectively address the persistent impunity which persists in Kosovo.<br />

Across the Balkans, impunity <strong>for</strong> <strong>war</strong> <strong>crimes</strong> remains one of the most serious human rights<br />

concerns. In Kosovo impunity persists <strong>for</strong> <strong>war</strong> <strong>crimes</strong> committed by both sides of the 1999<br />

armed conflict. Few of the Serb military, police and paramilitary <strong>for</strong>ces responsible <strong>for</strong> <strong>war</strong><br />

<strong>crimes</strong> against Kosovo Albanians have been brought to justice. However, even fewer members<br />

of the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), responsible <strong>for</strong> <strong>war</strong> <strong>crimes</strong> against Kosovo Serbs, Roma<br />

and members of other minority communities have been prosecuted and convicted.<br />

Despite the presence in Kosovo since 1999 of international police, and (since 2000) of<br />

international prosecutors and judges, charged with the investigation, prosecution and<br />

adjudication of <strong>war</strong> <strong>crimes</strong>, little progress was made by EULEX’s predecessor, the United<br />

Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK).<br />

In January 2008 <strong>Amnesty</strong> <strong>International</strong> published a report, Kosovo (Serbia): The challenge to<br />

fix a failed UN justice mission, which described the failures of UNMIK’s international justice<br />

system in Kosovo. 1 This report demonstrated that UNMIK had failed to establish an effective<br />

and impartial justice system, with concrete reference to the investigation and prosecution of<br />

<strong>war</strong> <strong>crimes</strong>. That report made specific recommendations, “to any future EU mission or any<br />

other international body mandated to assist the government of Kosovo in ensuring the<br />

development of a fully functional prosecutorial and judicial system in Kosovo (irrespective of<br />

the <strong>for</strong>m of any agreement on the final status of Kosovo)”. These recommendations sought to<br />

ensure that the then-planned EULEX mission did not make the same mistakes as UNMIK.<br />

As this report illustrates, many of <strong>Amnesty</strong> <strong>International</strong>’s recommendations were indeed<br />

taken on board and put into practice by EULEX, although over the ensuing years, in several<br />

areas EULEX either failed to identify solutions or gradually fell back into UNMIK’s old ways.<br />

In this report, and bearing in mind the organization’s 2008 recommendations, <strong>Amnesty</strong><br />

<strong>International</strong> analyses the progress made by EULEX in the investigation and prosecution of<br />

<strong>war</strong> <strong>crimes</strong>. In the light of those findings the organization makes a series of new<br />

recommendations which aim to in<strong>for</strong>m decision-makers in EU member states and<br />

institutions, in advance of their extension of EULEX’s mandate.<br />

Index: EUR 70/004/2012 <strong>Amnesty</strong> <strong>International</strong> April 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!