24.02.2013 Views

annual report 2011 - Office for Research - Northwestern University

annual report 2011 - Office for Research - Northwestern University

annual report 2011 - Office for Research - Northwestern University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bernard Black<br />

School of Law and Kellogg School of Management<br />

Does Hospital Infection Reporting Affect<br />

Actual Infection Rates?<br />

Health-care associated infections (HAIs), often acquired in<br />

hospitals, kill about 100,000 people <strong>annual</strong>ly. Many of these<br />

infections are preventable. In response to the epidemic of<br />

HAIs, many states have adopted laws requiring hospitals<br />

to publicly <strong>report</strong> their infection rates. But whether public<br />

<strong>report</strong>ing affects hospital behavior, and thus affects actual<br />

infection rates, and by how much, is unknown.<br />

Bernard Black, law instruction and finance, and coauthors<br />

Hyun Kim and Myungho Paik of the <strong>University</strong> of Texas at<br />

Austin have studied the first state (Pennsylvania) to require<br />

detailed public <strong>report</strong>ing and one important type of highly<br />

serious and often fatal infection, central-line-associated<br />

bloodstream infections (known as CLABSI). Using a strong<br />

difference-in-differences research design, they find that<br />

a measure of CLABSI rates, based on hospital billing<br />

records, drops by 23 percent in Pennsylvania relative to<br />

states without public <strong>report</strong>ing. The drop in CLABSI rates<br />

is concentrated in hospitals with high <strong>report</strong>ed rates. This<br />

suggests that public <strong>report</strong>ing in fact changes the behavior<br />

of hospitals with high infection rates.<br />

They also compare their non<strong>report</strong>ed measure with the<br />

CLABSI rates that hospitals publicly <strong>report</strong>. The publicly<br />

<strong>report</strong>ed rates drop far faster, by 40 percent over 2005–07;<br />

more than twice the 17 percent drop in inpatient rates<br />

during this period. This suggests that hospitals are “gaming”<br />

the publicly <strong>report</strong>ed rates. That is, some of the decline<br />

in <strong>report</strong>ed rates appears to be real, but some appears to<br />

reflect hospitals changing how they <strong>report</strong> infections.<br />

30 Annual Report <strong>2011</strong> | Excellence in <strong>Research</strong><br />

Black and his coauthors recently received a $450,000 grant<br />

from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to extend this<br />

Courtesy of B. Black<br />

research to other states and other types of HAIs.<br />

The figure below presents key results. The top blue line<br />

shows CLABSI rates in non<strong>report</strong>ing states; the red line<br />

shows rates in Pennsylvania. The two lines are parallel<br />

prior to the beginning of public <strong>report</strong>ing in Pennsylvania<br />

but diverge afterward. The green dotted line shows the<br />

Pennsylvania publicly <strong>report</strong>ed rates <strong>for</strong> the available period<br />

of 2005–07, extrapolated be<strong>for</strong>e and after this period based<br />

on rates estimated from billing records. The rapid drop in<br />

the green line during 2005–07 suggests that hospitals are, in<br />

part, gaming the public <strong>report</strong>s.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!