25.02.2013 Views

View - State of Iowa

View - State of Iowa

View - State of Iowa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ch 1, p.30 CIVIL PROCEDURE December 2010<br />

(2) That the discovery may be had only on specified terms and conditions, including a designation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the time or place.<br />

(3) That the discovery may be had only by a method <strong>of</strong> discovery other than that selected by the<br />

party seeking discovery.<br />

(4) That certain matters not be inquired into, or that the scope <strong>of</strong> the discovery be limited to certain<br />

matters.<br />

(5) That discovery be conducted with no one present except persons designated by the court.<br />

(6) That a deposition after being sealed be opened only by order <strong>of</strong> the court.<br />

(7) That a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information not<br />

be disclosed or be disclosed only in a designated way.<br />

(8) That the parties simultaneously file specified documents or information enclosed in sealed<br />

envelopes to be opened as directed by the court.<br />

b. Shall limit the frequency <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> the methods described in rule 1.501(1) if it determines that<br />

any <strong>of</strong> the following applies:<br />

(1) The discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative or duplicative, or is obtainable from some<br />

other source that is more convenient, less burdensome, or less expensive.<br />

(2) The party seeking discovery has had ample opportunity by discovery in the action to obtain<br />

the information sought.<br />

(3) The burden or expense <strong>of</strong> the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit, taking into<br />

account the needs <strong>of</strong> the case, the amount in controversy, the parties’ resources, the importance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

issues at stake in the litigation, and the importance <strong>of</strong> the proposed discovery in resolving the issues.<br />

1.504(2) A party need not provide discovery <strong>of</strong> electronically stored information from sources<br />

that the party identifies as not reasonably accessible because <strong>of</strong> undue burden or cost. On motion<br />

to compel discovery or for a protective order, the party from whom discovery is sought must show<br />

that the information is not reasonably accessible because <strong>of</strong> undue burden or cost. If that showing<br />

is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows<br />

good cause, considering the limitations <strong>of</strong> rule 1.504(1)(b). The court may specify conditions for the<br />

discovery.<br />

1.504(3) If the motion for a protective order is denied in whole or in part, the court may, on such<br />

terms and conditions as are just, order that any party or person provide or permit discovery. The<br />

provisions <strong>of</strong> rule 1.517(1)(d) apply to the award <strong>of</strong> expenses incurred in relation to the motion.<br />

[Report 1943; amendment 1965; amendment 1970; amendment 1973; October 31, 1997, effective January<br />

24, 1998; November 9, 2001, effective February 15, 2002; February 14, 2008, effective May 1, 2008]<br />

Rule 1.505 Sequence and timing <strong>of</strong> discovery. Unless the court upon motion orders otherwise for<br />

the convenience <strong>of</strong> parties and witnesses and in the interests <strong>of</strong> justice, methods <strong>of</strong> discovery may<br />

be used in any sequence and the fact that a party is conducting discovery, whether by deposition or<br />

otherwise, shall not operate to delay any other party’s discovery.<br />

[Report 1943; amendment 1957; amendment 1973; November 9, 2001, effective February 15, 2002]<br />

Rule 1.506 Stipulations regarding discovery procedure. Unless the court orders otherwise, the<br />

parties may by written stipulation do the following:<br />

1.506(1) Provide that depositions may be taken before any qualified person, at any time or place,<br />

upon any notice, and in any manner and when so taken may be used like other depositions.<br />

1.506(2) Modify the procedures provided by these rules for other methods <strong>of</strong> discovery.<br />

[Report 1975; amended by 66GA, ch 259, §1; amendment 1976; October 31, 1997, effective January 24,<br />

1998; November 9, 2001, effective February 15, 2002]<br />

COMMENT: As parties rarely enter into formal stipulations extending the times to answer interrogatories or respond to production<br />

requests, the requirement for formal stipulations is removed. Formal stipulations remain required for extensions <strong>of</strong> time for responding<br />

to requests for admissions. The final phrase <strong>of</strong> the rule clarifies the time within which a response is required in the event the court<br />

supersedes a stipulation. Consistent with rule 1.502, the requirement that discovery stipulations be filed, including those regarding<br />

responses to requests for admissions, is deleted.<br />

Rule 1.507 Discovery conference.<br />

1.507(1) At any time after commencement <strong>of</strong> an action, the court may direct the attorneys for the<br />

parties to appear before it for a conference on the subject <strong>of</strong> discovery. The court shall do so upon<br />

motion by the attorney for any party if the motion includes:<br />

a. A statement <strong>of</strong> the issues as they then appear.<br />

b. A proposed plan and schedule <strong>of</strong> discovery.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!