26.02.2013 Views

August 2009 - Florida Yacht Brokers Association, Inc.

August 2009 - Florida Yacht Brokers Association, Inc.

August 2009 - Florida Yacht Brokers Association, Inc.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

By Johnlee S. Curtis, Esq.* of Moore & Company, P.A.<br />

As greater technological tools have become available for the<br />

exploration of the sea’s surface, increasing numbers of salvors<br />

and explorers have met with success in uncovering underwater<br />

assets, such as historic shipwrecks and artifacts.<br />

Naturally, with these discoveries have come disputes over<br />

ownership. These disputes are between two groups: governments/archeologists<br />

and salvors. In the cases that have been<br />

decided, each of these groups uses different legal theories to<br />

present their respective, opposing cases.<br />

The salvors have primarily used admiralty law and filed admiralty<br />

claims in federal courts in the United States arguing that<br />

the law of “finds” entitles them ownership to abandoned historic<br />

shipwrecks and their cargo. Additionally, they have<br />

argued that salvage awards should be granted for the act of<br />

rescuing the yachts of yore (and their booty) from “marine<br />

peril” and returning them to the stream of commerce. The<br />

governments/archeologists have used a variety of laws to try<br />

to defend against the unregulated pillaging of submerged cultural<br />

property. These laws come in two categories. First, they<br />

have used claims of ownership rights (when they are governments<br />

and the vessels are within their territorial waters).<br />

Second, they have used preservation laws and permitting regulations.<br />

A brief look at the relevant cases and legal doctrines<br />

is illustrative of how all of these polar arguments have fared.<br />

One landmark case, Treasure Salvors v. The Unidentified<br />

Wrecked and Abandoned Sailing Vessel, 569 F.2d 330 (5th<br />

Cir. 1978) (“Treasure Salvors”) held that the Outer<br />

Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 USC 1331, et seq.) only<br />

extended United States jurisdiction to the outer continental<br />

shelf for purposes of exploration and exploitation of its natural<br />

resources, not for purposes of controlling salvaged abandoned<br />

historic shipwrecks. Thus, the salvors have continued<br />

to use maritime law to assert salvage claims to submerged cultural<br />

property.<br />

State governments have claimed ownership of submerged cultural<br />

property via the Abandoned Shipwreck Act of 1987<br />

(“ASA”). The ASA exercises federal sovereign prerogative<br />

over abandoned shipwrecks and transfers title to them to the<br />

states in which the abandoned shipwrecks are resting. This<br />

allows state governments to assert title to and manage these<br />

abandoned shipwrecks as against salvors. However, the ASA<br />

applies only to wrecks within three nautical miles of the<br />

shores of U.S. states and territories, and the ASA only protects

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!