Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry - Institut za Stočarstvo

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 28 (3), p 393-633, 2012 ISSN 1450-9156 Publisher: Institute for Animal Husbandry, Belgrade-Zemun UDC 636 Editorial Council Prof. Dr Milica Petrović, president Prof. Dr Lidija Perić, full prof. Prof. Dr Vojislav Pavlović, full prof. Dr. Zoran Lugić, science advisor Editor’ s Office Prof. Dr. Martin Wähner, Germany Dr. Branislav Živković, Serbia Dr. Marin Todorov, Bulgaria Dr. Milan M. Petrović, Serbia Prof. Dr. Kazutaka Umetsu, Japan Prof. Dr. Dragan Glamočić, Serbia Prof. Dr. Vigilijus Jukna, Lithuania Dr. Elena Kistanova, Bulgaria Prof. Dr Zlatko Skalicki, full prof. Dr Miroslav Blagojević Dr Branka Vidić, science advisor Prof. Dr. Wladyslaw Migdal, Poland Prof. Dr. Colin Whitehead, United Kingdom Dr. Branislav Bobček, Slovak Republic Prof. Dr. Sandra Edwards, United Kingdom Dr. Vojislav Mihailović, Serbia Prof. Dr. Giacomo Biagi, Italy Prof. Dr. Stelios Deligeorgis, Greece Prof. Dr. Hasan Ulker, Turkey Dr. Catalin Dragomir, Romania On behalf of publisher Miloš Lukić, PhD, Research Fellow, Director of the Institute for Animal Husbandry, Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia Editor in Chief Zlatica Pavlovski, PhD, Science Advisor, Institute for Animal Husbandry, Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia Deputy Editor in Chief Zorica Tomić, PhD, Science Advisor, Institute for Animal Husbandry, Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia Editor Miloš Lukić, Ph.D, Research Fellow, Institute for Animal Husbandry, Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia Section Editors Genetics and breeding Milan P. Petrović, Ph.D, science advisor Reproduction and management Miroslav Žujović, Ph.D, science advisor Nutrition and physiology of domestic animals Ljljana Sretenović, Ph.D, science advisor Language editor Olga Devečerski, grad. prof. Food safety, technology and quality of animal products Stevica Aleksić, Ph.D, science advisor Sustainability of feed production and ecology Zorica Bijelić, Ph.D, research fellow Alternative production in livestock Zdenka Škrbić, Ph.D, senior research fellow Address of the Editor’s office Institute for Animal Husbandry, Autoput 16, P. Box 23, 11080 Belgrade-Zemun, Republic of Serbia Tel. 381 11 2691 611, 2670 121; Fax 381 11 2670 164; e-mail: biotechnology.izs@gmail.com; www.istocar.bg.ac.rs Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry is covered by Agricultural Information Services (AGRIS) -Bibliographic coverage of abstracts; Electronic Journal Access Project by Colorado Altiance Research Libraries -Colorado, Denver; USA; Matica Srpska Library -Referal Center; National Library of Serbia; University Library "Svetozar Markovic", Belgrade, Serbia According to CEON bibliometrical analysis citation in SCI index 212, in ISI 9, impact factor (2 and 5) of journal in 2007: 0,667 and 0,467, - M24 category Annual subscription: for individuals -500 RSD, for organizations 1200 RSD, -foreign subscriptions 20 EUR. Bank account Institut za stočarstvo, Beograd-Zemun 105-1073-11 Aik banka Niš Filijala Beograd. Journal is published in four issues annually, circulation 100 copies. The publication of this journal is sponsored by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Serbia. Printed: "Mladost birošped", Novi Beograd, St. Bulevar AVNOJ-a 12, tel. 381 11 2601-506
Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 28 (3), p, 393-404, 2012 ISSN 1450-9156 Publisher: Institute for Animal Husbandry, Belgrade-Zemun UDC 637.05 DOI: 10.2298/BAH1203393P SHELL QUALITY – EVERLASTING PROBLEM IN THE TODAY POULTRY SCIENCE Z. Pavlovski 1 , Z. Škrbić 1 , M. Lukić 1 , D. Vitorović 2 , S. Lilić 3 , V. Petričević 1 1 Institute for Animal Husbandry, Autoput 16, P.Box 23, 11080 Belgrade, Republic of Serbia 2 Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, 11080 Belgrade, Republic of Serbia 3 Institute of Meat Hygiene and Technology, Kaćanskog 13, Beograd, Republic of Serbia Corresponding author: zlaticapav@yahoo.com Review paper Abstract: Shell breakage (6-20%) is of major concern for its economic consequences and safety of egg consumption. A great deal of effort in the fields of nutrition, genetics and enviromental conditions have been carried out to improve eggshell quality but understanding the formation of the eggshell fabric and the origin of shell defects is perhaps the key to solving eggshell problems. The aim of this review is to summarise new information on eggshell problems. The aim of this review is to summarise new infotmation on eggshell formation and update the nutritional unfavourable enviromental conditions. Keywords: Egg production, shell quality, problem, possible solutions Introduction The quality of the egg shell is still a major concern of many participants in the poultry production chain, producers of table eggs and hatching egg producers. The successful development of a chicken embryo depends on the quality of the egg shell, i.e. its robustness for the purpose of protection, protection from infection and water loss from the egg, and most importantly, it is a source of calcium for the formation of the skeleton of the embryo (Lavelin et al., 2000). On the other hand, in the commercial production and marketing, table eggs are exposed to many shocks affecting percentage of broken and cracked eggs and thus directly affecting the economic losses of the producer. In addition, there is growing concern about the safety (hygiene compliance) of eggs, as the egg shell is the first barrier against bacterial penetration of the egg and therefore must be free of defects. Ban on cage system of housing hens in the EU, also increases the risk of infection from
Page 1 and 2: UDC636 Print ISSN 1450-9156 Online
Page 3: Journal for the Improvement of Anim
Page 7 and 8: Shell quality - everlasting problem
Page 17 and 18: Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 2
Page 19 and 20: Effect of feathering alleles (k/K +
Page 29 and 30: The effect of phase nutrition durin
Page 39 and 40: Egg quality of japanese quail ... e
Page 41 and 42: Egg quality of japanese quail ... I
Page 43: Egg quality of japanese quail ... H
Page 46 and 47: 434 E. N. Uchewa et al. an average
Page 48 and 49: 436 E. N. Uchewa et al. days the ex
Page 50 and 51: 438 E. N. Uchewa et al. Uticaj kva
Page 55 and 56:
Estimation of the relative bioavail
Page 57 and 58:
Results and discussion Estimation o
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
References Estimation of the relati
Page 65:
Page 68 and 69:
456 V. Vidovic et al. existing sele
Page 70 and 71:
458 V. Vidovic et al. All the facto
Page 72 and 73:
460 Conclusion V. Vidovic et al. Th
Page 74 and 75:
462 V. Vidovic et al. VIDOVIC V. (1
Page 76 and 77:
464 Č. Radović et al. Radović et
Page 78 and 79:
466 Č. Radović et al. Table 3. Th
Page 80 and 81:
468 Č. Radović et al. CHAN D. E.,
Page 82 and 83:
470 M. Popovac et al. Most frequent
Page 84 and 85:
472 M. Popovac et al. Roehe and Ken
Page 86 and 87:
474 M. Popovac et al. heritability
Page 89 and 90:
Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 2
Page 91 and 92:
Table 1. Composition of diets for p
Page 93 and 94:
Meat fatty acid profile of ... Tabl
Page 95 and 96:
Meat fatty acid profile of ... SFA
Page 97 and 98:
Rezime Meat fatty acid profile of .
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Material and methods The effect of
Page 103 and 104:
The effect of the level of milk ...
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Results of the biological... al.,(1
Page 113 and 114:
Results of the biological... Table
Page 115 and 116:
Results of the biological... highly
Page 117 and 118:
Results of the biological... In vie
Page 119:
Results of the biological... perspe
Page 122 and 123:
510 R.T. Gudaj et al. Companies dea
Page 124 and 125:
512 Results and Discussion R.T. Gud
Page 126 and 127:
514 R.T. Gudaj et al. blame cows th
Page 128 and 129:
516 R.T. Gudaj et al. RUTHERFORD K.
Page 130 and 131:
518 M.P.Petrovic et al. some author
Page 132 and 133:
520 M.P.Petrovic et al. Table 1. So
Page 134 and 135:
522 M.P.Petrovic et al. In the Medi
Page 136 and 137:
524 M.P.Petrovic et al. The signifi
Page 138 and 139:
526 M.P.Petrovic et al. AL-SHOREPY
Page 140 and 141:
528 M.P.Petrovic et al. PETROVIC, P
Page 142 and 143:
530 D. Ružić-Muslić et al. In th
Page 144 and 145:
532 D. Ružić-Muslić et al. with
Page 146 and 147:
534 Conclusion D. Ružić-Muslić e
Page 148 and 149:
536 D. Ružić-Muslić et al. RODRI
Page 150 and 151:
538 Introduction Z. Ilić et al. In
Page 152 and 153:
540 Z. Ilić et al. the lowest weig
Page 154 and 155:
542 Z. Ilić et al. 31.60%, while t
Page 156 and 157:
544 Z. Ilić et al. HOSSEINI S. M.
Page 158 and 159:
546 J. Stojković et al. ammonia, c
Page 160 and 161:
548 J. Stojković et al. Throughout
Page 162 and 163:
550 Conclusion J. Stojković et al.
Page 164 and 165:
552 J. Stojković et al. STOJKOVIĆ
Page 166 and 167:
554 M. Joksimović Todorović et al
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
558 Acknowledgment M. Joksimović T
Page 172 and 173:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Fatty acid profile in ... Zlatibor,
Page 179 and 180:
Fatty acid profile in ... Table 1.
Page 181 and 182:
Fatty acid profile in ... The highe
Page 183 and 184:
Fatty acid profile in ... respektiv
Page 185:
Fatty acid profile in ... TRBOVIĆ
Page 188 and 189:
576 H. F. Abou-Shaara et al. Abou-S
Page 190 and 191:
578 H. F. Abou-Shaara et al. of for
Page 192 and 193:
580 Inner wing width 2.1 2 1.9 1.8
Page 194 and 195:
582 Conclusion H. F. Abou-Shaara et
Page 196 and 197:
584 H. F. Abou-Shaara et al. RAINA
Page 198 and 199:
586 S. Janković et al. well and gi
Page 200 and 201:
588 S. Janković et al. covariance
Page 202 and 203:
590 S. Janković et al. yield can b
Page 204 and 205:
592 References S. Janković et al.
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Quality and condition of ... breakd
Page 211 and 212:
Quality and condition of ... volume
Page 213 and 214:
Quality and condition of ... signif
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Upgrading of sugarcane bagasse by .
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Conclusion Upgrading of sugarcane b
Page 223:
Page 226 and 227:
614 Ya. Kozhouharov et al. t.ha -1
Page 228 and 229:
616 Ya. Kozhouharov et al. complete
Page 230 and 231:
618 Ya. Kozhouharov et al. signific
Page 232 and 233:
620 Ya. Kozhouharov et al. and with
Page 234 and 235:
622 Ya. Kozhouharov et al. U poređ
Page 236 and 237:
624 S. Đedović et al. almost inva
Page 238 and 239:
626 Results and Discussion S. Đedo
Page 240 and 241:
628 S. Đedović et al. was slightl
Page 242 and 243:
630 S. Đedović et al. The environ
Page 244 and 245:
632 S. Đedović et al. 68% i u tre
Page 246 and 247:
Instruction for authors Papers for
Page 248 and 249:
PETROVIĆ D.M., GUTIĆ M., BOGOSAVL
Page 250 and 251:
Registration fee • Registration f
Page 252:
Kotizacija • Kotizacija koja uklj
show all

Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry - Institut za Stočarstvo

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?