Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry - Institut za Stočarstvo

More documents

Recommendations

Info

430 Acknowledgment M. Đukić Stojčić et al. Research was financed by the Ministry of Education, Science and Tehnological Development, Republic of Serbia, project TR 31033. KVALITET JAJA JAPANSKE REPELICE(Coturnix coturnix japonica) M. Đukić Stojčić, N. Milošević, L. Perić, I. Jajić, N. Tolimir Rezime Poslednjih godina japanska prepelica (Coturnix coturnix japonica) postaje sve više popularna kao izvor mesa i jaja. Informacije o karakteristikama kvaliteta jaja su uglavnom bila vezana za kokošija jaja. Cilj ovoga rada je da unapredi znanje o kvalitetu jaja prepelica. Predstavljeni su podaci o spoljašnjem i unutrašnjem kvalitetu prepeličjih jaja sa tri različite komercijalne farme. Parametari težina jaja, indeks oblika, debljina ljuske, težina ljuske se statistički značajno ne razlikuju između tri farme. Boja žumanca, težina žumana i belanca statistički su se razlikovale između sve tri farme. Nije bilo statistčki značajne razlike u sili loma između farmi A i B dok su se jaja sa farme C statistički bitno razlikovala u sili loma od fame A i B. Najlošiji kvalitet belanca zabeležen je u jajima sa farme A. Parametri boja žumanca, Hogove jedinice i procentualni udeo pojedinih delova jaja (belance, žumance i ljuska) se ne razlikuju bitno između kokošijih i prepeličijih jaja. Takođe hemijski sastav prepeličijih i kokošijih jaja je veoma sličan. Sa druge strane parametri koji se razlikuju a za koje je bilo i očekivati da će se razlikovati između kokošijih i prepeličijih jaja su težina jaja ( oko pet puta manja masa jaja prepelica u odnosu na kokošija jaja), indeks oblika, sila loma i debljina ljuske. Spoljašnji i unutrašnji kvalitet prepeličijih jaja iz tri različite farme u Srbiji se ne razlikuje od rezultata o kvalitetu prepeličijih jaja iz drugih zemalja. Ovo istraživenje doprinosi razvoju nauke o kvalitetu prepeličijih jaja jer obuhvata i neke parametre koji do sada nisu bili objavljeni u literaturi od strane drugih istraživača iz ove oblasti. References DUDUSOLA, I. O. (2010): Comparative evaluation of internal and external qualities of eggs from quail and guinea fowl. International Research Journal of Plant Science, 1(5) 112-115. DUDUSOLA, I. O. (2009): Effects of Storage Methods and Length of Storage on some Quality Parameters of Japanese Quail Eggs. Tropicultura, 27 ( 1) 45-48.
Egg quality of japanese quail ... HAUGH, R.R. (1937): The Haugh unit for measuring egg quality. U.S. Egg Poultry Magazine, 43 552-553 and 572-573. IPEK, A., CANBOLAT, O., KARABULUT, A. (2007): The Effect of Vitamin E and Vitamin C on the Performance of Japanese Quails (Coturnix Coturnix Japonica) Reared under Heat Stress during Growth and Egg Production Period. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. 20 (2 ) 252 – 256. KUL S., SEKER, I. (2004): Phenotypic Correlations Between Some External and Internal Egg Quality Traits in the Japanese Quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). International Journal of Poultry Science, 3 (6) 400-405. MILOŠEVIĆ, N. and PERIĆ, L. (2011): Tehnologija živinarske proizvodnje. Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Poljoprivredni fakultet, Novi Sad, pp. 33-42. NAZLIGUL, A., BARDAKCIOGLU, H.E., TURKYILMAZ, N.K., ORAL, D.C. (2001): The effect of cage density on egg weight, egg prodcution and feed consumpstion in Japanese quails. J. Fac. Vet. Med. Univ. 27 (2) 429-438. NOWACZEWSKI, S., KONTECKA, H., ROSIÑSKI,A., KOBERLING, S., KORONOWSKI, P. (2010): Egg Quality of Japanese Quail Depends on Layer Age and Storage Time. Folia biologica, 58 3-4. ODUNSI, A.A., ROTIMI, A.A., AMAO, E.A. (2007): Effect of Different Vegetable Protein Sources on Growth and Laying Performance of Japanese Quails (Coturnix Coturnix Japonica) in a Derived Savannah Zone of Nigeria. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3 (5) 567-571. OZCELIK, M. (2002): The phenotypic correlations among some external and internal quality characteristics in Japanese quail eggs. Vet. J. Ankara Univ., 49 67-72. PAVLOVSKI, Z., HOPIĆ, S. and LUKIĆ, M. (2001): Housing systems for layers and egg quality. Biotechnology for Animal Science, 17, 197-200. PUNYA KUMARIL, B., RAMESH GUPTA, B., GNANA PRAKASH, M., RAJASEKHAR REDDY, A. (2008): A study of egg quality traits in Japanese quails. J. Veterinary & Animal Sciences 4 (6) 227-231. SONG, K. T., CHOI, S. H., OH, H. R. (2000): A comparison of Egg Quality of Pheasant, Chukar, Quail and Guinea Fowl. Asian-Aus. J. Anim. Sci., 13 (7) 986- 990. VUILLEUMIER, J.P. (1969): The ‘Roche Yolk Colour Fan’-An Instrument for Measuring Yolk Colour. Poultry Science, 48: 767-779. Received 16 May 2012; accepted for publication 11 August 2012 431
Page 1 and 2: UDC636 Print ISSN 1450-9156 Online
Page 3 and 4: Journal for the Improvement of Anim
Page 5 and 6: Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 2
Page 7 and 8: Shell quality - everlasting problem
Page 19 and 20: Effect of feathering alleles (k/K +
Page 29 and 30: The effect of phase nutrition durin
Page 39 and 40: Egg quality of japanese quail ... e
Page 41: Egg quality of japanese quail ... I
Page 46 and 47: 434 E. N. Uchewa et al. an average
Page 48 and 49: 436 E. N. Uchewa et al. days the ex
Page 50 and 51: 438 E. N. Uchewa et al. Uticaj kva
Page 55 and 56: Estimation of the relative bioavail
Page 57 and 58: Results and discussion Estimation o
Page 63 and 64: References Estimation of the relati
Page 65: Estimation of the relative bioavail
Page 68 and 69: 456 V. Vidovic et al. existing sele
Page 70 and 71: 458 V. Vidovic et al. All the facto
Page 72 and 73: 460 Conclusion V. Vidovic et al. Th
Page 74 and 75: 462 V. Vidovic et al. VIDOVIC V. (1
Page 76 and 77: 464 Č. Radović et al. Radović et
Page 78 and 79: 466 Č. Radović et al. Table 3. Th
Page 80 and 81: 468 Č. Radović et al. CHAN D. E.,
Page 82 and 83: 470 M. Popovac et al. Most frequent
Page 84 and 85: 472 M. Popovac et al. Roehe and Ken
Page 86 and 87: 474 M. Popovac et al. heritability
Page 91 and 92: Table 1. Composition of diets for p
Page 93 and 94:
Meat fatty acid profile of ... Tabl
Page 95 and 96:
Meat fatty acid profile of ... SFA
Page 97 and 98:
Rezime Meat fatty acid profile of .
Page 99 and 100:
Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 2
Page 101 and 102:
Material and methods The effect of
Page 103 and 104:
The effect of the level of milk ...
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Results of the biological... al.,(1
Page 113 and 114:
Results of the biological... Table
Page 115 and 116:
Results of the biological... highly
Page 117 and 118:
Results of the biological... In vie
Page 119:
Results of the biological... perspe
Page 122 and 123:
510 R.T. Gudaj et al. Companies dea
Page 124 and 125:
512 Results and Discussion R.T. Gud
Page 126 and 127:
514 R.T. Gudaj et al. blame cows th
Page 128 and 129:
516 R.T. Gudaj et al. RUTHERFORD K.
Page 130 and 131:
518 M.P.Petrovic et al. some author
Page 132 and 133:
520 M.P.Petrovic et al. Table 1. So
Page 134 and 135:
522 M.P.Petrovic et al. In the Medi
Page 136 and 137:
524 M.P.Petrovic et al. The signifi
Page 138 and 139:
526 M.P.Petrovic et al. AL-SHOREPY
Page 140 and 141:
528 M.P.Petrovic et al. PETROVIC, P
Page 142 and 143:
530 D. Ružić-Muslić et al. In th
Page 144 and 145:
532 D. Ružić-Muslić et al. with
Page 146 and 147:
534 Conclusion D. Ružić-Muslić e
Page 148 and 149:
536 D. Ružić-Muslić et al. RODRI
Page 150 and 151:
538 Introduction Z. Ilić et al. In
Page 152 and 153:
540 Z. Ilić et al. the lowest weig
Page 154 and 155:
542 Z. Ilić et al. 31.60%, while t
Page 156 and 157:
544 Z. Ilić et al. HOSSEINI S. M.
Page 158 and 159:
546 J. Stojković et al. ammonia, c
Page 160 and 161:
548 J. Stojković et al. Throughout
Page 162 and 163:
550 Conclusion J. Stojković et al.
Page 164 and 165:
552 J. Stojković et al. STOJKOVIĆ
Page 166 and 167:
554 M. Joksimović Todorović et al
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
558 Acknowledgment M. Joksimović T
Page 172 and 173:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Fatty acid profile in ... Zlatibor,
Page 179 and 180:
Fatty acid profile in ... Table 1.
Page 181 and 182:
Fatty acid profile in ... The highe
Page 183 and 184:
Fatty acid profile in ... respektiv
Page 185:
Fatty acid profile in ... TRBOVIĆ
Page 188 and 189:
576 H. F. Abou-Shaara et al. Abou-S
Page 190 and 191:
578 H. F. Abou-Shaara et al. of for
Page 192 and 193:
580 Inner wing width 2.1 2 1.9 1.8
Page 194 and 195:
582 Conclusion H. F. Abou-Shaara et
Page 196 and 197:
584 H. F. Abou-Shaara et al. RAINA
Page 198 and 199:
586 S. Janković et al. well and gi
Page 200 and 201:
588 S. Janković et al. covariance
Page 202 and 203:
590 S. Janković et al. yield can b
Page 204 and 205:
592 References S. Janković et al.
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Quality and condition of ... breakd
Page 211 and 212:
Quality and condition of ... volume
Page 213 and 214:
Quality and condition of ... signif
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Upgrading of sugarcane bagasse by .
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Conclusion Upgrading of sugarcane b
Page 223:
Page 226 and 227:
614 Ya. Kozhouharov et al. t.ha -1
Page 228 and 229:
616 Ya. Kozhouharov et al. complete
Page 230 and 231:
618 Ya. Kozhouharov et al. signific
Page 232 and 233:
620 Ya. Kozhouharov et al. and with
Page 234 and 235:
622 Ya. Kozhouharov et al. U poređ
Page 236 and 237:
624 S. Đedović et al. almost inva
Page 238 and 239:
626 Results and Discussion S. Đedo
Page 240 and 241:
628 S. Đedović et al. was slightl
Page 242 and 243:
630 S. Đedović et al. The environ
Page 244 and 245:
632 S. Đedović et al. 68% i u tre
Page 246 and 247:
Instruction for authors Papers for
Page 248 and 249:
PETROVIĆ D.M., GUTIĆ M., BOGOSAVL
Page 250 and 251:
Registration fee • Registration f
Page 252:
Kotizacija • Kotizacija koja uklj
show all

Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry - Institut za Stočarstvo

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?