Research Matters 16 - Aberystwyth University
Research Matters 16 - Aberystwyth University
Research Matters 16 - Aberystwyth University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
teach and assess students (or facilitate<br />
the learning process, as we must now<br />
term it); how best to disseminate their<br />
research; how to give a conference<br />
paper; how to go about the business of<br />
getting published; how to initiate<br />
and/or engage with academic networks<br />
and organise conferences. All this<br />
seems blindingly obvious, and on the<br />
whole, today’s doctoral students<br />
engage energetically with all of these<br />
aspects of the PhD process which are<br />
essential for career development and<br />
CV building. I also happen to think<br />
that they are intrinsically a good thing<br />
to do. Far from ‘diluting’ the PhD<br />
experience, I think that the modern<br />
PhD process enriches it. Perhaps my<br />
view is coloured by the fact that I can<br />
(just about) recall a time when the PhD<br />
process was one in which students<br />
were left pretty much on their own to<br />
find out more and more about less and<br />
less; when it was assumed that they<br />
could just go into a classroom and<br />
teach because they had themselves<br />
experienced the process of being<br />
taught (often rather badly I might add);<br />
when they might find themselves<br />
giving a paper to a specialist seminar<br />
having received no guidance<br />
whatsoever, and so on.<br />
The PhD process as a stage<br />
As I indicated earlier, it is likely that<br />
the PhD process will have elements<br />
added to it in the near future in the<br />
form of the further development of<br />
both employability and knowledge-<br />
transfer awareness and skills. I expect<br />
to see developments which link to the<br />
increasing emphasis placed by RCUK<br />
and others on collaborative working<br />
and working across disciplinary<br />
boundaries. Notwithstanding the<br />
British Academy’s reduction of its<br />
postdoctoral awards, the increasing<br />
availability of postdoctoral awards<br />
from other sources and the emergence<br />
4<br />
of an array of early and mid-career<br />
research development awards is<br />
evidence of a growing<br />
acknowledgement that the PhD process<br />
and product are just a stage – albeit an<br />
important one – in the development of<br />
a researcher.<br />
Lyn Pykett<br />
_______________________________<br />
Lyn Pykett is Pro Vice Chancellor for<br />
<strong>Research</strong> and Professor of English at<br />
<strong>Aberystwyth</strong>. Her most recent book, Authors in<br />
Context: Wilkie Collins (2005) has just been<br />
re-issued by Oxford World’s Classics in the<br />
influential ‘Authors in Contexts’ series.<br />
_______________________________<br />
The Outsider,<br />
or, On Being an<br />
External Examiner<br />
Most people remember<br />
their first meeting with<br />
their external examiner.<br />
More often than not,<br />
despite the fact that<br />
candidates have normally read at least<br />
some of the external’s work<br />
beforehand, it’s during the viva voce<br />
that they first encounter them in<br />
person. It’s a nerve-wracking occasion<br />
anyway, but the presence of this<br />
stranger, this outsider, can make it all<br />
the more so. Recently, I adopted this<br />
‘outsider’ role, having been asked to<br />
act as an external examiner on a thesis<br />
for the first time. Given my own<br />
sojourn as a PhD candidate, I was keen<br />
to use my old ‘inside’ perspective to<br />
inform my new ‘outside’ one. Here are<br />
some reflections on that experience…<br />
Before the viva<br />
Upon receiving the thesis and finding<br />
the time to open it, I first checked the<br />
table of contents and pagination, and