01.03.2013 Views

ACME 2011 Proceedings of the 19 UK National Conference of the ...

ACME 2011 Proceedings of the 19 UK National Conference of the ...

ACME 2011 Proceedings of the 19 UK National Conference of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

horizontal confining pressure is maintained at a constant value whilst <strong>the</strong> vertical pressure is<br />

incrementally increased at <strong>the</strong> rate indicated. The properties that describe <strong>the</strong> behaviour <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> material are<br />

provided in Owen et al. 2007, where <strong>the</strong> parameters required are readily identified from standard triaxial<br />

and tension tests. In addition to <strong>the</strong> usual elastic properties, <strong>the</strong> essential parameters are <strong>the</strong> tensile<br />

strength, compressive strength, fracture energy release rate and <strong>the</strong> standard Mohr-Coulomb data. An<br />

additional parameter is <strong>the</strong> frictional sliding coefficient on newly created discrete cracks. The material<br />

parameters employed correspond to Lac du Bonnet granite (Lee et al. <strong>19</strong>93) and <strong>the</strong> weak sedimentary<br />

rock Cardova cream limestone (Haimson et al. <strong>19</strong>93).<br />

Figure 1. Borehole breakout example:<br />

Geometry and mesh.<br />

Figure 2: Comparison <strong>of</strong> experimental and<br />

numerically predicted failure patterns for Granite<br />

(upper)and Limestone (lower)<br />

Figure 2 illustrates <strong>the</strong> fracture patterns developed for <strong>the</strong> two materials where it is seen that<br />

fundamentally different mechanisms are involved. For <strong>the</strong> granite specimen, Figure 2(a), failure takes<br />

place by <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> sub-vertical fractures at <strong>the</strong> regions indicated and very good agreement is<br />

evident between <strong>the</strong> experimental observations (Lee et al. <strong>19</strong>93) and <strong>the</strong> numerical predictions. In Figure<br />

2(b) similar comparison is made for <strong>the</strong> Cardova cream limestone, for which failure takes place by <strong>the</strong><br />

development <strong>of</strong> fracture shear bands. In <strong>the</strong> computational model <strong>the</strong>se manifest <strong>the</strong>mselves as distinct<br />

crack bands formed by en-echelon systems <strong>of</strong> tensile fractures. Again, <strong>the</strong>re is a strong correspondence<br />

between <strong>the</strong> experimental failure mode (Haimson et al. <strong>19</strong>93) and <strong>the</strong> numerical simulation. It is<br />

important to note that <strong>the</strong> computational model has been able to reproduce <strong>the</strong>se two fundamentally<br />

different failure mechanisms by only changing <strong>the</strong> relevant material parameters.<br />

Fluid flow within fracturing rock masses<br />

Throughout <strong>the</strong> geomechanics community <strong>the</strong>re is considerable interest in modelling groundwater flow<br />

through fracturing rock masses. Application areas include slope stability problems and hydraulic<br />

fracturing in <strong>the</strong> oil recovery industry. The essential features <strong>of</strong> such problems are <strong>the</strong> flow <strong>of</strong> water both<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!