01.03.2013 Views

Deliverable 6: List of ongoing experiments - Ctba

Deliverable 6: List of ongoing experiments - Ctba

Deliverable 6: List of ongoing experiments - Ctba

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Annexe 8: Assessment <strong>of</strong> beech (Fagus sylvatica) storage under humid<br />

conditions: compact piles covered with plastic sheets (PVC) and<br />

polyethylene sheets<br />

ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />

TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Intermediary project report<br />

THEME : 3. Storage under humid conditions. 3.4.2. Compact pile covered with plastic sheets (logs with<br />

bark)<br />

3. Storage under humid conditions. 3.4.3. Compact pile covered with geo textile fabric (logs<br />

with bark)<br />

ORIGINAL TITLE : Suivi du sciage du hêtre chablis. Procédé de conservation du hêtre sous atmosphère<br />

confinée.<br />

AUTHORS : Y. Gorget; O. Snieg; P. Vautherin<br />

PUBLICATION DATE: February 2002<br />

ORGANISATION : CTBA, STIR-ONF<br />

COUNTRY: France<br />

ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />

This project deals with storage under humid conditions <strong>of</strong> beech (fagus sylvatica), namely ‘compact pile covered<br />

with plastic sheets’ (with oxygen exclusion) and ‘compact pile covered with polyethylene sheets’. The aim was<br />

to assess these methods in terms <strong>of</strong> wood quality. A first assessment was made 10 months after the beginning <strong>of</strong><br />

the conservation.<br />

1. Compact pile covered with plastic sheets<br />

With regard to the results obtained after kiln drying, no significant differences appeared between fresh timbers<br />

and beech conserved under compact piles covered with plastic sheets (PVC). Slightly less deformations in the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> beech wrapped in plastic sheets, final Moisture Content homogenous , drying time similar, no<br />

discoloration after sanding.<br />

Concerning mechanical and physical properties, a decrease by 15% seems to occur<br />

concerning the modulus <strong>of</strong> elasticity in flexion and 20% with regard to the modulus <strong>of</strong> rupture<br />

in flexion compared to the literature. Nevertheless, these results needs to be confirmed since<br />

no information was given concerning the wood quality and its origins. In other terms, no<br />

conclusion can be drawn from these results.<br />

As far as veneer manufacture is concerned, no particular difficulties were encountered during the process and the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> the veneer was similar to the one manufactured from fresh wood.<br />

Finally, concerning the visual aspects <strong>of</strong> the planks sawn from the conserved logs, 4% were stained (brown<br />

stains), 1.5% were attacked by white rot, no s<strong>of</strong>t rot attacks neither dote were obvious. In other terms, after 10<br />

months <strong>of</strong> conservation, the conserved logs were still in perfect conditions.<br />

2. compact pile covered with polyethylene sheets<br />

After 10 months <strong>of</strong> conservation, the overall results were quite bad (white rot attack, blue stain, bad bark<br />

condition, dote). This method should not be applied in the future to conserve beech.<br />

20<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!