Deliverable 6: List of ongoing experiments - Ctba
Deliverable 6: List of ongoing experiments - Ctba
Deliverable 6: List of ongoing experiments - Ctba
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>List</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>ongoing</strong> <strong>experiments</strong><br />
<strong>Deliverable</strong> D6<br />
STODAFOR – Storm Damaged Forests : efficient and safe<br />
harvesting and log conservation methods<br />
May 2003<br />
Didier Pischedda, CTBA, France<br />
Emmanuel Bastet, CTBA, France<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), Afocel (F), TUD (D), BRE (UK),<br />
FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
Participants:<br />
This European project is currently carried out by the following 16 partners under the global<br />
coordination <strong>of</strong> CTBA.<br />
CTBA, Technical Institute for Wood Technology and Furniture Manufacture (France):<br />
Didier Pischedda – Coordinator<br />
Emmanuel Bastet<br />
FVA, Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Wuerttemberg (Germany): Gerold Mahler<br />
Manuela Bacher<br />
Christian Pfeil<br />
KVL, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University (Denmark): Andreas Bergstedt<br />
EMPA, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research (Switzerland): Martin Arnold<br />
CBE, Biomass Centre for Energy (Portugal): Joana Carinhas<br />
BFH, Bundesforschungsanstalt für Forst- und Holzwirtschaft (Germany) : Rolf-Dieter Peek<br />
UPM, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid (Spain): Eduardo Tolosona<br />
DLFRI, Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute (Denmark): Ebbe Boellehuus<br />
TTI, Trees and Timber Institute (Italy): Claudio Pollini<br />
Claudia Nati<br />
Lorenzo Valenti<br />
AFOCEL, Association Forêt Cellulose (France): Maryse Bigot<br />
Jérôme Moreau<br />
TUD, Technical University Dresden (Germany): Claus-Thomas Bues<br />
BRE, Building Research Establishment (UK): Keith Maun<br />
FMRE, Institute <strong>of</strong> Forest and Mountain Risk Engineering (Austria): Ewald Pertlik<br />
ICSTM, The Imperial College <strong>of</strong> Science Technology and Medicine (UK): David Dickinson<br />
UOP, University <strong>of</strong> Portsmouth Higher Education Corporation (UK): Rodney Eaton<br />
NISK, Norsk Institutt for Skogforskning (Norway): Jan Bjerketvedt<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)<br />
2
Contents<br />
Participants: 2<br />
1. Objectives 4<br />
2. General comments 4<br />
3. <strong>List</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>ongoing</strong> <strong>experiments</strong> 4<br />
3.1. France 4<br />
3.2. Germany 5<br />
3.3. Switzerland 6<br />
3.4. United kingdom 6<br />
4. Patents 6<br />
5. Conclusion 7<br />
Annexes 8<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)<br />
3
1. Objectives<br />
The main objective <strong>of</strong> Workpackage 4 was to make out a list <strong>of</strong> the <strong>ongoing</strong> research and<br />
<strong>experiments</strong> started after December 1999.<br />
2. General comments<br />
All the partners were involved in this work. Nevertheless, only 4 countries launched some<br />
research following this event since many <strong>of</strong> them such as the UK, Spain, Portugal, Norway<br />
and the Netherlands were not affected by the storm. The numbers <strong>of</strong> <strong>ongoing</strong> research is the<br />
following:<br />
• France : 10<br />
• Germany : 5<br />
• Switzerland : 2<br />
• Great Britain : 1<br />
Due to the rather late date <strong>of</strong> the project’s “kick-<strong>of</strong>f” (November 2001), most <strong>of</strong> the <strong>ongoing</strong><br />
research were launched before any common harmonised procedures were ready for use,<br />
especially with regard to log conservation. But the fact remains that the work out <strong>of</strong> these<br />
common procedures will greatly improved the exchange between countries in the future.<br />
3. <strong>List</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>ongoing</strong> <strong>experiments</strong><br />
3.1. France<br />
Institute Title Description / remarks Annexe<br />
CTBA<br />
CTBA,<br />
ONF,<br />
DERF<br />
CTBA,<br />
INRA,<br />
LRBB<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> the beech (Fagus<br />
sylvatica) properties and more<br />
precisely its coloration following a<br />
period <strong>of</strong> immersion and water<br />
spraying<br />
Comparison between logs conserved<br />
under water spraying conditions and<br />
green timbers in terms <strong>of</strong> sawing,<br />
drying, and planing processes, and in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> environmental and trade<br />
issues<br />
Assessment and improvement <strong>of</strong> live<br />
conservation method <strong>of</strong> blown trees<br />
for beech (Fagus sylvatica)<br />
Experimental site for maritime<br />
pine’s log conservation (Pinus<br />
Pinaster) using three different<br />
methods<br />
Objectives:⇒ Colour assessment<br />
⇒ Assessment <strong>of</strong> the ‘steaming’ process<br />
⇒ Assessment <strong>of</strong> rotary cutting <strong>of</strong> veneer<br />
⇒ Environmental impacts (PH, COD,<br />
Nitrogen, BOD)<br />
Objectives: Comparison between green and ‘water<br />
sprayed’ logs in terms <strong>of</strong> :<br />
⇒ sawing/planing process<br />
⇒ Kiln drying process<br />
⇒ Environmental impacts<br />
Objectives:<br />
⇒ Assessment <strong>of</strong> the wood quality <strong>of</strong> live conserved<br />
trees (according to the CTBA’s protocol and in term<br />
<strong>of</strong> economical loss)<br />
⇒ Assessment <strong>of</strong> the wax application method on the<br />
faces<br />
Goals: ⇒ Assessment <strong>of</strong> the mechanical properties<br />
(MOE, MOR) using non destructive methods<br />
⇒ Environmental impacts (PH, COD,<br />
Nitrogen, BOD, toxicity)<br />
⇒ Assessment <strong>of</strong> the industrial site<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)<br />
4<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4
AFOCEL<br />
CTBA<br />
LEF<br />
(Economic<br />
Laboratory<br />
<strong>of</strong> Forestry<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
ENGREF)<br />
Storage <strong>of</strong> logs under water<br />
sprinklers: Regulations, technical<br />
and economical aspects<br />
Blue staining in maritime pine<br />
(Pinus Pinaster) windthrown stored<br />
on site<br />
Fibres quality <strong>of</strong> maritime pine<br />
windthrowns stored on site and<br />
under water sprinkling<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> beech (Fagus<br />
sylvatica) storage under humid<br />
conditions: compact piles covered<br />
with plastic sheets (PVC) and<br />
polyethylene sheets<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> storage under drying<br />
conditions (compact pile/ log<br />
debarked) <strong>of</strong> spruce (Picea abies)<br />
and fir (abies alba)<br />
Log conservation in France by water<br />
spraying/ economic issues<br />
3.2. Germany<br />
Description <strong>of</strong> the French regulations, the equipment<br />
and the economical aspects that need to be taken into<br />
account to implement a water sprayed site<br />
Monitoring <strong>of</strong> the evolution <strong>of</strong> blue staining in<br />
windthrown maritime pine stored on site for 10<br />
months<br />
Moisture content, pulping yield and kraft parper<br />
properties were assessed every month for 3 different<br />
type <strong>of</strong> conservation: on site; wet storage and dry<br />
storage<br />
Thanks to a special device, the logs were regularly and<br />
visually monitored as well as the moisture content in<br />
each batch within a 2 years period.<br />
After a 6 months period <strong>of</strong> storage, 2% loss in yield<br />
and 18.5% economic loss due to downgrading <strong>of</strong> the<br />
raw material<br />
Goals: ⇒ Economic assessment <strong>of</strong> log conserved<br />
under water spraying<br />
⇒ Assessment <strong>of</strong> the industrial site<br />
Institute Title Description / remarks Annexe<br />
FVA<br />
Log conservation under oxygen<br />
exclusion / Oxygen exclusion<br />
method: 2000-2001<br />
Storm damaged forest: Efficient and<br />
safe harvesting and log conservation<br />
methods - 1<br />
Storm damaged forest: Efficient and<br />
safe harvesting and log conservation<br />
methods - 2<br />
Beech conservation under oxygen<br />
exclusion<br />
Root rot in water stored piles<br />
Goals: improvement <strong>of</strong> the method for fir, larch,<br />
Norway spruce, beech, Douglas fir (assessment for<br />
sawmill and veneer mill quality)<br />
Objective: conservation <strong>of</strong> logs wrapped with plastic<br />
film under realistic conditions (e.g. 2500 m3 beech<br />
roundwood for production <strong>of</strong> veneer were packed up<br />
for industries in plastic film)<br />
Objective: storage under plastic films: estimation <strong>of</strong><br />
the surviving rate <strong>of</strong> wood damaging insects and fungi<br />
at conifer logs, that were stored without oxygen for<br />
different long times.<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> beech conservation under oxygen<br />
exclusion during a 16 months period in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
discoloration, cracks and exterior and interior wood<br />
quality<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> root rot evolution under water<br />
sprinkling conservation on Spruce and Fir<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)<br />
5<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15
3.3. Switzerland<br />
Institute Title Description / Remarks Annexe<br />
EMPA<br />
Study <strong>of</strong> extent, detection, cause and<br />
consequences <strong>of</strong> compression<br />
failures<br />
Collection and analysis <strong>of</strong> current<br />
experiences with different methods<br />
3.4. United kingdom<br />
Wood utilisation: wood properties, grading, early<br />
detection, modelling <strong>of</strong> damage mechanisms<br />
Log conservation, entomology, wood quality<br />
monitoring by ultrasonic<br />
Institute Title Description / Remarks Annexe<br />
UOP<br />
4. Patents<br />
Susceptibility <strong>of</strong> harvested<br />
s<strong>of</strong>twoods to infection by sapstaining<br />
fungi<br />
Susceptibility <strong>of</strong> 5 s<strong>of</strong>twood species to blue stain 17<br />
With regard to the patents, 2 patent applications were filed concerning logs conserved under<br />
oxygen exclusion (log piles wrapped in plastic sheets). One is French and the other is<br />
German.<br />
The German patent has been filed by the Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg<br />
(FVA) and the Technical University <strong>of</strong> Dresden (TUD). It is an European Patent under the<br />
Publication-Number: 0946340. This latter was published in the paper 'Patentblatt',<br />
14.11.2001.<br />
The inventors are the following: Dr. Gerold Mahler, Kirchzarten<br />
Christoph Richter, Tharandt<br />
Dr. Martin Groß, Freiburg<br />
Andreas Weber, Tharandt<br />
Thomas Maier, Gundelfingen<br />
Jürgen, König, Tharandt<br />
Concerning the French pattern, the name <strong>of</strong> the French owner company, is STEP.<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)<br />
16<br />
6
5. Conclusion<br />
Although only 4 countries launched some <strong>experiments</strong> following the storm in December<br />
1999, no doubt that the works described throughout this deliverable, will greatly improved the<br />
understanding and the efficiency in terms <strong>of</strong> global management when undergoing such<br />
storm. With regard to France, the greater number <strong>of</strong> <strong>experiments</strong> is probably due to the fact<br />
that France was poorly involved in the big storm in 1990 whereas Germany had to stand up to<br />
millions <strong>of</strong> destroyed hectares. Concerning the other countries, the low number <strong>of</strong> launched<br />
<strong>experiments</strong> is simply due to the fact that these latter suffered only slightly from this storm.<br />
Following this bibliographical work, a more active phase becomes possible i.e. figuring out<br />
the remaining unsolved questions (D5) and the relevant additional <strong>experiments</strong> which<br />
deserved to be launched in the future (D7). This deliverable is also an important step towards<br />
a better cooperation between the European countries where many research remained unknown<br />
from a country to another.<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)<br />
7
Annexes<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)<br />
8
Annexe 1 : Assessment <strong>of</strong> the beech (Fagus sylvatica) properties and<br />
more precisely its coloration following a period <strong>of</strong> immersion and water<br />
spraying<br />
Intermediary report<br />
ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />
TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Ongoing experiment/ research project<br />
THEME : Conservation 3.2.1. Water storage, compact pile with water sprinkling/spraying (logs with<br />
bark)<br />
Conservation 3.2.2. Water storage. Ponding/Immersion (log with bark)<br />
ORIGINAL TITLE : Evolution des propriétés du bois de hêtre et plus particulièrement sa coloration lors de<br />
conservation par immersion et aspersion.<br />
AUTHORS : J.L. Bonnet, J. Mirjolet<br />
PUBLICATION DATE: <strong>ongoing</strong><br />
ORGANISATION : CTBA, ONF<br />
COUNTRY: France<br />
ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />
This project deals with the conservation <strong>of</strong> beech (Fagus sylvatica) under water storage (water spraying and<br />
immersion). It is expected to last 2 years and it consists in an examination <strong>of</strong> the planks sawn from the conserved<br />
logs. Some planks were steamed. Some veneers were also cut and examined.<br />
The first results are the following:<br />
• The immersed logs are darker in colour than the water sprayed ones.<br />
• After 13 months, immersed logs are heterogeneous in colour. During the kiln drying,<br />
some wide stains appeared under the sticks. These defects do not occur after a 6<br />
months period <strong>of</strong> water spraying.<br />
• In terms <strong>of</strong> colour, the water sprayed logs are better conserved than the immersed logs.<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> immersed wood, the discoloration starts from 1 month after the<br />
beginning <strong>of</strong> the storage. Concerning water sprayed logs, discoloration occurs from<br />
the 6 th month <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />
• The steamed planks present homogeneous colour and are barely distinguishable from<br />
the planks coming from green logs. The steaming process seems to be achieved more<br />
quickly than for green wood (the necessary time for the steaming process decreases by<br />
15 to 20% for water sprayed logs and by 20 to 25% for the immersed logs)<br />
• The veneer manufacture occurred without particular problems apart from a small<br />
percentage attacked by fungi.<br />
The following first conclusions may be drawn from these results:<br />
• It does not seem possible to obtain planks clear in colour with water storage methods<br />
as far as beech is concerned.<br />
• Steaming process is an appropriate method to make planks homogeneous in colour.<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)<br />
9
• With regard to the environment, PH, COD value (Chemical oxygen demand), nitrogen<br />
value and O2 content were measured. No pollution was obvious. On the contrary,<br />
water quality seemed to be enhanced in the case <strong>of</strong> immersion.<br />
10<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
Annexe2 : Comparison between logs conserved under water spraying<br />
conditions and green timbers in terms <strong>of</strong> sawing, drying, and planing<br />
processes, and in terms <strong>of</strong> environmental and trade issues<br />
ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />
TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Ongoing experiment/ research project<br />
THEME : Conservation 3.2.1. Water storage, compact pile with water sprinkling/spraying (logs with bark)<br />
ORIGINAL TITLE : Comparaison entre la transformation des bois conservés sous aspersion et celle des bois<br />
frais (Sciage, séchage, rabottage, intérêt environnemental, aspect commercial)<br />
AUTHORS : Vautherin P., Snieg O., Bastet E.<br />
PUBLICATION DATE: <strong>ongoing</strong><br />
ORGANISATION : CTBA<br />
COUNTRY: France<br />
ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to determine the differences between green timbers and logs conserved under water<br />
spraying in terms <strong>of</strong> environmental and economical issues and in terms <strong>of</strong> management throughout the sawing,<br />
planing and drying processes.<br />
The work is currently carried out within French companies. Three species are examined, namely oak (Quercus<br />
Spp) for hardwoods and fir (Abies Spp) and spruce (Picea Abies) for s<strong>of</strong>twoods. The study is expected to last 2<br />
years from 2002 to 2004.<br />
At that moment, oak has been the only species studied with regard to the sawing process. This work was<br />
performed in the sawmills at an industrial rate. The following data were measured: moisture content, energy<br />
consumption, blade wear, cutting speed, cutting height , nodosity. At that point, 4 main conclusions may be<br />
drawn from the study:<br />
1. Whatever the wood type (water sprayed or green timbers) and the cutting height, the energy consumption<br />
remains more or less the same. This phenomenon may be explained by the fact that the sawyer always tends<br />
to have the same cutting resistance. In other words, for a same type <strong>of</strong> timber, the thicker is the sawn board,<br />
the slower it is sawn, but the energy consumption remains the same. The difference in energy consumption<br />
between fresh and water sprayed logs ranges from 1% to 6% depending on the sawmills.<br />
2. The influence <strong>of</strong> the nodosity is negligible compared to the thickness <strong>of</strong> the board (100 times smaller)<br />
3. In the same way, the influence <strong>of</strong> the blade wear is negligible compared to the thickness <strong>of</strong> the board.<br />
Nevertheless, a significant decrease in speed <strong>of</strong> the sawing process occurs while the wear blade increases.<br />
4. At an equal energy consumption level and for the same log diameter, the speed <strong>of</strong> the sawing process seems<br />
to be 10% to 20% higher for the water sprayed logs than for the green logs. However, it should be noticed<br />
that the time spent by the blade into the wood (which is the time measured in the study) represents 25% <strong>of</strong><br />
the total sawing process (sawing + movement <strong>of</strong> the bogie carriage for log saw + log turning)<br />
Some general observations have also been made:<br />
• Debarking: easier but the size <strong>of</strong> the bark pieces is also bigger and they can obstruct or clog up the debarker.<br />
11<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
• Immediately after the sawing process, the boards issued from the water sprayed logs seem to be slightly<br />
darker. Besides, this difference tends to disappear following the drying process.<br />
• On a logistic point <strong>of</strong> view, it seems that the benefits involved by this conservation method are significant.<br />
Actually, this latter prevents the wood from deteriorating during spring time (dote, mould, brown striped,<br />
etc.) and being downgraded.<br />
12<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
Annexe 3 : Assessment and improvement <strong>of</strong> live conservation method <strong>of</strong><br />
blown trees for beech (Fagus sylvatica)<br />
ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />
TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Project report<br />
THEME : 3. Conservation methods; 3.1. On site conservation ; 3.1.1. live conservation <strong>of</strong> blown trees<br />
3.6. Chemical wood protection<br />
ORIGINAL TITLE : Suivi et amélioration de deux techniques de conservation du bois de hêtre en Meurthe et<br />
Moselle et en Haute Marne<br />
AUTHOR : I. Vinkler<br />
PUBLICATION DATE: August 2002<br />
ORGANISATION : CTBA, ONF, DERF<br />
COUNTRY: France<br />
ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />
This project deals with beech (fagus sylvatica) live conservation over a 2 years period. 704 blown trees were<br />
examined, scattered in two French regions (‘Meurthe et Moselle’ and ‘Haute Marne’). Just after the storm, these<br />
trees were still living since their roots were partly damaged or even not damaged at all.<br />
Concerning harvested logs, in order to slow down the drying speed <strong>of</strong> the logs, a method using wax on the faces,<br />
was also assessed.<br />
If the method involving wax is still used in France for oak in some cases, this technique seems totally inefficient<br />
for beech: the attacked log percentages remain exactly the same compared to the logs without wax on their faces.<br />
As far as live conservation is concerned, the general results are rather encouraging: after one year, the percentage<br />
<strong>of</strong> attacked logs by fungi (involving an economical loss) ranges from 7% to 16% for scattered blown trees and<br />
around 30% for blown trees located in totally damaged area (i.e. exposed to 100% <strong>of</strong> the sunlight). After 2 years,<br />
the percentage <strong>of</strong> wood deterioration increases widely with regard to scattered blown trees, ranging from 27% to<br />
35% (average made for every sample area).<br />
With regard to paper pulp properties, these latter are strongly correlated with the moisture content. Therefore, an<br />
important decrease in pulp yield occurred during the second year following the December 1999 storm. This pulp<br />
yield decreased by 5% within the second spring/summer period. Nevertheless, the pulp properties following the<br />
first live conservation year remained good and steady.<br />
Among the factors likely to influence wood deterioration, the far most important is the sample area’s light level.<br />
The more the blown trees are exposed to the sunlight, the higher is the deterioration rate since the quicker<br />
decreases the moisture content. Other factors, such as the site type, the ground contact, the crown damages or the<br />
log diameter are negligible compared to the light level. However, the following observations were noticed:<br />
1. The effect <strong>of</strong> the log’s ground contact seems to influence the wood quality only the second year but<br />
remains negligible.<br />
2. The more the crown is damaged, the higher the deterioration rate.<br />
3. The bigger is the living tree’s diameter, the higher the deterioration rate. This trend is only obvious<br />
the second year <strong>of</strong> live conservation.<br />
4. When the tree falls down, the more its roots’ network is displaced, the higher the deterioration rate<br />
13<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
Conclusion:<br />
As far as beech is concerned and despite the fact that this species is likely to colour quickly, live conservation is<br />
a rather efficient and inexpensive method within the first year following the storm. It could even be worth using<br />
it during the second year provided that the blown trees are scattered in the forest (trees not or partly exposed to<br />
the sunlight).<br />
14<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
Annexe 4 : Experimental site for maritime pine’s log conservation (Pinus<br />
Pinaster) using three different methods<br />
Intermediary report<br />
ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />
TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Ongoing experiment/ research project<br />
THEME : Conservation 3.2.1. Water storage, compact pile with water sprinkling/spraying (logs with<br />
bark)<br />
Conservation 3.6. Chemical wood protection<br />
Conservation 3.2.2. Water storage. Ponding/Immersion (log with bark)<br />
ORIGINAL TITLE : Site atelier de conservation longue durée du pin maritime / Rapport intermédiaire<br />
AUTHORS : Anonymous.<br />
PUBLICATION DATE: <strong>ongoing</strong><br />
ORGANISATION : CTBA, INRA, Pine Institute, ONF, CEMAGREF, LRBB, AFOCEL, Xylomeca<br />
COUNTRY: France<br />
ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />
An experimental platform has been implemented in the South West <strong>of</strong> France (Aquitaine) to assess within a 3<br />
years period, the wood quality and the impact on the environment <strong>of</strong> the 3 different log conservation methods<br />
(water spraying, immersion, chemical treatment).<br />
The species involved is maritime pine (Pinus Pinaster). Slightly more than 2000m 3 are monitored, <strong>of</strong> which 15%<br />
<strong>of</strong> paper wood, 15% <strong>of</strong> blowndown timbers already deteriorated by fungi and 70% <strong>of</strong> fresh industrial wood.<br />
The following table summarises the timber volume involved depending on the wood type (paper wood, industrial<br />
wood, deteriorated wood) and the conservation methods used.<br />
Conservation methods Wood type Volume (m 3 )<br />
Water spraying<br />
Industrial wood 400<br />
Paper wood 325<br />
Attacked wood 150<br />
Immersion Industrial wood 125<br />
Chemical treatment Industrial wood 375<br />
Water spraying with recycling water<br />
system<br />
Witness<br />
Industrial wood 75<br />
Industrial wood 350<br />
Attacked wood 150<br />
With regard to the environment, the following data are measured: PH, conductivity, COD value (Chemical<br />
oxygen demand), BOD value (biological oxygen demand), nitrogen value, toxicity on luminescent bacteria<br />
called Vibrio Fisheri.<br />
15<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
As far as wood quality is concerned, 3 non destructive methods were tested and correlated to the results obtained<br />
with the usual destructive methods: ultrasound analysis (Sylvatest/ CTBA), vibrator analysis and resistance<br />
analysis. This latter is achieved thanks to a machine called ‘resistograph’ which measure the rate <strong>of</strong> penetrability<br />
<strong>of</strong> a screw into the wood in a diametrical direction.<br />
CTBA and AFOCEL have also carried out a survey among the south west industrial sites to gather information<br />
on equipment, costs and to assess the defects and the advantages <strong>of</strong> their wood conservation.<br />
Intermediary results:<br />
By a period <strong>of</strong> 2 years, the toxicity involved by the 3 different types <strong>of</strong> log conservation seems to remain low but<br />
fluctuates within the very first months.<br />
Concerning the wood quality, the association <strong>of</strong> the non destructive methods appears to be an efficient system to<br />
measure MOE and MOR since their results are well correlated with the ones obtained with destructive methods.<br />
Furthermore, it seems that the mechanical features do not degrade even after a 2 years conservation period <strong>of</strong><br />
time.<br />
The first results after 8 months showed that whereas most <strong>of</strong> the untreated logs were bluestained, 73 % to 100 %<br />
<strong>of</strong> water-immersed logs and 94 % to 100 % <strong>of</strong> water-sprayed logs were preserved with less than 6 % <strong>of</strong><br />
bluestained area. Moreover, neither preservation method led to a loss <strong>of</strong> modulus <strong>of</strong> elasticity or <strong>of</strong> rupture.<br />
16<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
Annexe 5 : Storage <strong>of</strong> logs under water sprinklers: Regulations, technical<br />
and economic aspects<br />
ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Common practice<br />
TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Technical publication<br />
THEME : Conservation 3.2.1. Water storage, compact pile with water sprinkling/spraying (logs with bark)<br />
ORIGINAL TITLE : Stockage des bois par aspersion. Aspects réglementaires, tecniques et économiques<br />
AUTHORS : J. Moreau (Afocel)<br />
PUBLICATION DATE: 2000<br />
ORGANISATION : Afocel, ENGREF-INRA, CEMAGREF<br />
COUNTRY: France<br />
ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />
After the storms that occurred in France in December 99, the amount <strong>of</strong> windthrown wood was estimated<br />
at 138 millions <strong>of</strong> m3 (accounting for 3 harvesting years in France).<br />
Various means were used in order to face with this huge incoming wood amounts before wood gets<br />
degrade. Harvesting means and rate <strong>of</strong> sawmills productions were increased, sawings were stored, round<br />
logs were exported and logs were stored under water sprinklers.<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> this document is to describe in concrete terms the storage <strong>of</strong> logs under water sprinklers.<br />
The first part screens the different storage methods (on site conservation, storage, at road side, under low oxygen<br />
atmosphere, underwater laying, under water sprinklers) and take stock for each method <strong>of</strong> the expected<br />
wood quality.<br />
In the second part, the storage under water sprinklers is then specifically approached and developed<br />
through technical and regulations aspects whose knowledge is essential to set up a storage place.<br />
The technical study <strong>of</strong> the storage (size <strong>of</strong> the water sprinkler system, ducts kinds, logs layout) is also<br />
approached through four concrete examples.<br />
In the end, a calculation methods <strong>of</strong> the storage costs and pr<strong>of</strong>itability analysis is<br />
presented. Spreadsheets files are available on the enclosed floppy disk.<br />
17<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
Annexe 6 : Blue staining in maritime pine wind-thrown (Pinus Pinaster)<br />
stored on site<br />
ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />
TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Ongoing experiment<br />
THEME : Conservation 3.1.1. : In situ storage, live conservation <strong>of</strong> wind-thrown trees<br />
ORIGINAL TITLE : Evolution du bleuissement des chablis de Pin maritime dans le massif Landais<br />
AUTHORS : J. Moreau (AFOCEL), J.R. Liarçou (CRPF Aquitaine)<br />
PUBLICATION DATE: 02/2001<br />
ORGANISATION : AFOCEL, CRPF<br />
COUNTRY: France<br />
ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />
After the hurricane that occurred in France in December 1999, the huge amount <strong>of</strong> wind-thrown wood involved phytosanitary<br />
hazards. In the short run, the most formidable threat <strong>of</strong> depreciation for saw-logs was the development <strong>of</strong> bluestain.<br />
Hence AFOCEL lead with CRPF a study in order to monitor the evolution <strong>of</strong> bluestain contamination in maritime pine windthrown<br />
stored on site in South West <strong>of</strong> France. Each month, from March to December 2000, the degree <strong>of</strong> bluestain<br />
development in wood was assessed on 600 fresh saw-logs selected just after felling on 20 damaged stands.<br />
The contamination <strong>of</strong> the wind-thrown trees remains limited. One year after the storm, 40% <strong>of</strong> saw logs observed were not<br />
contaminated by bluestain. Before the insects attacks occurred no bluestain damage was notice on logs on dry site but there<br />
were several logs contaminated on wet site. On such land trees contamination could have happen through broken roots. After<br />
insects attacks the contamination <strong>of</strong> the logs rapidly reach 60% on both type <strong>of</strong> site.<br />
If a storm occurred in winter season, we could make this simple recommendation: to harvest first wind thrown<br />
trees on wet sites and quickly before insects attacks.<br />
18<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
Annexe 7 : Conservation <strong>of</strong> maritime pine windthrown in the South<br />
West <strong>of</strong> France<br />
ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />
TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Ongoing experiment<br />
THEME : Conservation 3.2.1 : Water storage, compact pile with water sprinkling / spraying (logs with<br />
bark)<br />
Conservation 3.1.1 : In situ storage, live conservation <strong>of</strong> wind-thrown trees<br />
ORIGINAL TITLE : Qualité des fibres issues des bois de chablis de pin maritime<br />
AUTHORS : J. Moreau, P. Nougier, G. Chantre (AFOCEL)<br />
PUBLICATION DATE: mars 2002<br />
ORGANISATION : AFOCEL<br />
COUNTRY: France<br />
ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />
After the hurricane <strong>of</strong> December 99, 25 millions <strong>of</strong> m 3 <strong>of</strong> maritime pine windthrown wood were stored on-site in<br />
South West <strong>of</strong> France (accounting for three harvesting years). Various means were used to face this huge<br />
incoming wood amounts before wood gets degrade, like the increase <strong>of</strong> harvesting means and rate <strong>of</strong> sawmill<br />
production, exportation and storage <strong>of</strong> round logs.<br />
In South West <strong>of</strong> France, different methods were used to store the maritime pine windthrows. The different<br />
methods were (1) on site conservation <strong>of</strong> blown trees, (2) wet storage and (3) dry storage. Regarding the lack <strong>of</strong><br />
experience <strong>of</strong> such conservation techniques on maritime pine, a sampling procedure was adapted to follow up the<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong> wood and fibre properties on the storage sites : moisture content, pulping yield and Kraft paper<br />
properties were assessed every month.<br />
Several years after the hurricane, significant experience and expertise is acquired. Blown trees stored on site<br />
were well preserved until the end <strong>of</strong> the first summer. Fibre and paper properties were firstly affected, then<br />
pulping yield, but much lower than harvested logs. The degradation between stands was heterogeneous, so that<br />
practical methods <strong>of</strong> selection should be set up to define different qualities <strong>of</strong> wood assortments. Two years after<br />
the hurricane, a major part <strong>of</strong> trees left on site could still be used for pulp and paper issues.<br />
The storage under water sprinkling, if it is well carried out, preserves the wood quality. After a 18 to 24 month<br />
period <strong>of</strong> wet storage, the quality <strong>of</strong> pulping logs <strong>of</strong> maritime pine is maintained. But the quality <strong>of</strong> debarked<br />
logs <strong>of</strong> maritime pine windthrows stored in compact piles can be worrying. The drying rate <strong>of</strong> these logs was not<br />
fast enough to ensure an optimal protection against the fungus attacks.<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> wood and fibre characteristics helps to understand the progressive and heterogeneous alteration <strong>of</strong><br />
the wood papermaking potential, and contributes to enhance the experience for the maritime pine log storage<br />
techniques.<br />
19<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
Annexe 8: Assessment <strong>of</strong> beech (Fagus sylvatica) storage under humid<br />
conditions: compact piles covered with plastic sheets (PVC) and<br />
polyethylene sheets<br />
ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />
TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Intermediary project report<br />
THEME : 3. Storage under humid conditions. 3.4.2. Compact pile covered with plastic sheets (logs with<br />
bark)<br />
3. Storage under humid conditions. 3.4.3. Compact pile covered with geo textile fabric (logs<br />
with bark)<br />
ORIGINAL TITLE : Suivi du sciage du hêtre chablis. Procédé de conservation du hêtre sous atmosphère<br />
confinée.<br />
AUTHORS : Y. Gorget; O. Snieg; P. Vautherin<br />
PUBLICATION DATE: February 2002<br />
ORGANISATION : CTBA, STIR-ONF<br />
COUNTRY: France<br />
ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />
This project deals with storage under humid conditions <strong>of</strong> beech (fagus sylvatica), namely ‘compact pile covered<br />
with plastic sheets’ (with oxygen exclusion) and ‘compact pile covered with polyethylene sheets’. The aim was<br />
to assess these methods in terms <strong>of</strong> wood quality. A first assessment was made 10 months after the beginning <strong>of</strong><br />
the conservation.<br />
1. Compact pile covered with plastic sheets<br />
With regard to the results obtained after kiln drying, no significant differences appeared between fresh timbers<br />
and beech conserved under compact piles covered with plastic sheets (PVC). Slightly less deformations in the<br />
case <strong>of</strong> beech wrapped in plastic sheets, final Moisture Content homogenous , drying time similar, no<br />
discoloration after sanding.<br />
Concerning mechanical and physical properties, a decrease by 15% seems to occur<br />
concerning the modulus <strong>of</strong> elasticity in flexion and 20% with regard to the modulus <strong>of</strong> rupture<br />
in flexion compared to the literature. Nevertheless, these results needs to be confirmed since<br />
no information was given concerning the wood quality and its origins. In other terms, no<br />
conclusion can be drawn from these results.<br />
As far as veneer manufacture is concerned, no particular difficulties were encountered during the process and the<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> the veneer was similar to the one manufactured from fresh wood.<br />
Finally, concerning the visual aspects <strong>of</strong> the planks sawn from the conserved logs, 4% were stained (brown<br />
stains), 1.5% were attacked by white rot, no s<strong>of</strong>t rot attacks neither dote were obvious. In other terms, after 10<br />
months <strong>of</strong> conservation, the conserved logs were still in perfect conditions.<br />
2. compact pile covered with polyethylene sheets<br />
After 10 months <strong>of</strong> conservation, the overall results were quite bad (white rot attack, blue stain, bad bark<br />
condition, dote). This method should not be applied in the future to conserve beech.<br />
20<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
Annexe 9 : Assessment <strong>of</strong> storage under drying conditions (compact pile /<br />
log without barked) <strong>of</strong> spruce (Picea abies) and fir (Abies alba)<br />
ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />
TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Intermediary project report<br />
THEME : 3.3. Storage under drying conditions.<br />
ORIGINAL TITLE : Suivi du sciage de sapin epicéa chablis / grumes écorcées stockées sans arrosage<br />
AUTHORS : S. Faure; J. Parrot<br />
PUBLICATION DATE: January 2001<br />
ORGANISATION : CTBA, ONF<br />
COUNTRY: France<br />
ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />
This project deals with storage under drying conditions (compact pile / log without barked) <strong>of</strong> spruce (Picea<br />
abies) and fir (Abies alba).<br />
After a 6 months period <strong>of</strong> conservation, the measured loss in yield was 2% in average compared with the yield<br />
that would have been obtained with green sawn timbers. With regard to the economic loss due to downgrading <strong>of</strong><br />
the planks (according to the European standardisation), the average loss was 18.5% in prices.<br />
21<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
Annexe 10 : Log conservation in France by water spraying / Economic<br />
aspects<br />
ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />
TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Intermediary project report<br />
THEME : 2.1. Economic aspects<br />
3.2.1. Compact piles with water sprinkling (logs with bark)<br />
ORIGINAL TITLE : Le stockage des bois en France après les tempêtes de Lothar et Martin / Approche<br />
économique<br />
AUTHORS : S. Costa; L. Ibanez<br />
PUBLICATION DATE: 2003<br />
ORGANISATION : LEF (Economic Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Forestry <strong>of</strong> the ENGREF)<br />
COUNTRY: France<br />
ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />
Economic study <strong>of</strong> water sprinkling conservation method according to the type <strong>of</strong> companies (sawmill, forest<br />
owner, paper industry, trader-transport company, forester, etc.). This study also answers the species that have<br />
been conserved, the type <strong>of</strong> wood (industrial wood or lumber), the input and output on the storage yard, the<br />
grants that have been attributed by the government in terms <strong>of</strong> equipment, loan and transport.<br />
When nothing was previously done on site, the total cost <strong>of</strong> the conservation method based on 38 different sites<br />
and calculated over a 3 years period, is estimated to 13€/m 3 . Provided that the site is already built up, the cost<br />
would be 9€/m 3 . A recycling water system is expected to increase the price by 1.6€/m 3 in average.<br />
22<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
Annexe 11: Oxygen exclusion method: 2000-2001<br />
ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />
TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Ongoing experiment/research project<br />
THEME : 3.5.1 “Special methods; Log conservation under oxygen exclusion, compact pile wrapped in plastic<br />
sheets<br />
ORIGINAL TITLE : Konservierung von Sturmholz unter Sauerst<strong>of</strong>fabschluss 2000 und 2001<br />
AUTHORS : D. Schleier; M. Wurster; Dr. G. Mahler<br />
PUBLICATION DATE: 2003<br />
ORGANISATION : Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg<br />
COUNTRY: Germany<br />
ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />
1.Introduction:<br />
In the years 2000 and 2001 were made several tests concerning conservation <strong>of</strong> wood in<br />
plastic film. First it was necessary to teach the teams who should pack up the piles with the<br />
plastic film, in order to get an air pro<strong>of</strong> atmosphere inside the pile. Besides the teaching <strong>of</strong> the<br />
manipulation technique there must have been provided the tools and material for the packing.<br />
Then there were created plastic film protected piles in 7 different places in the south <strong>of</strong> the<br />
black forest.<br />
2.Methods:<br />
For the packing <strong>of</strong> the piles were needed special machines, that was provided by the Forest Administration <strong>of</strong><br />
Baden-Württemberg. The tools that were needed were inter alia welding apparatuses, gas measures and tools for<br />
technical manipulating <strong>of</strong> the plastic film roll. The piles were wrapped in plastic film first and afterwards welded<br />
to get an air pro<strong>of</strong> atmosphere inside the pile.<br />
3.Participants:<br />
Forest Offices:<br />
• Bad Liebenzell<br />
Spruce and fir 10.400m³ in 45 piles (230m³/pile)<br />
• Nordrach<br />
Spruce and Fir 8572m³ in 35 piles (245m³/pile)<br />
• Bad Peterstal<br />
Spruce and Fir 4300m³ in 22 piles (195m³/pile)<br />
• Durbach<br />
Beech veneer quality 3500m³ in 37 piles (95m³/pile)<br />
• Aalen<br />
Spruce 1600m³ in 11 piles (145m³/pile)<br />
• Bühl<br />
Larch and douglas fir 1260m³ in 7 piles (180m³/pile)<br />
23<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
• Kandern<br />
Spruce and fir 1000m³ in 4 piles (250m³/pile)<br />
4.Research period:<br />
The method named before were made in the period <strong>of</strong> the years 2000-2001<br />
24<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
Annexe 12 : Storm damaged forest: Efficient and safe harvesting and log<br />
conservation methods<br />
ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />
TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Ongoing experiment/research project<br />
THEME : 1.4 Basic principles ; Choice <strong>of</strong> conservation method<br />
2.4 General considerations; Management / Operation<br />
ORIGINAL TITLE : Holzlagerung/Konservierung (Darstellung der verschiedenen Lagermöglichkeiten nach<br />
Baumarten und deren Einsatz nach Lothar, Bewertung der Lagermöglichkeiten für verschiedene Baumarten<br />
AUTHORS : M. Wurster; Dr. G. Mahler<br />
PUBLICATION DATE: 2003<br />
ORGANISATION : Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg<br />
COUNTRY: Germany<br />
ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />
1. Introduction<br />
At the beginning <strong>of</strong> the year 2000 the Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg arranged a staff position<br />
storm "Lothar". The task was to consult state and private forest administration in a capacious way<br />
and to act as an information point. Afterwords there was started the project conservation <strong>of</strong> logs wrapped with<br />
plastic film under realistic conditions (e.g. 2500 m3 beech roundwood for production <strong>of</strong> veneer were packed up<br />
for industries in plastic film)<br />
2. Methods<br />
• Collection and administration <strong>of</strong> literature concerning subjects with log conservation (e.g. consultancy<br />
in<br />
questions <strong>of</strong> consequences <strong>of</strong> wet storage for the chemical water quality).<br />
• Controlling and consulting <strong>of</strong> "reclamation" cases concerning conserved wood from storage.<br />
• Documentation and estimation <strong>of</strong> wood damages after storage with protocols:<br />
1.Theme/problem<br />
2.Location<br />
3.Type <strong>of</strong> sample<br />
4.Result<br />
5.Conclusion<br />
• Composing <strong>of</strong> guidelines for practical use in storage areas.<br />
• Description <strong>of</strong> the different storage methods:<br />
o The goal <strong>of</strong> the wet storage is saving <strong>of</strong> quality and the conservation <strong>of</strong> value <strong>of</strong> permanent<br />
available log. Considering a long term and environmental aspects.<br />
25<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
o The idea with the plastic film conservation method is to test an alternative way to the wet<br />
storage.<br />
o Furthermore there will be made a monitoring <strong>of</strong> the reaction <strong>of</strong> the bark beetles under<br />
conditions in piles, that are wrapped with plastic film.<br />
• Assessment <strong>of</strong> the plastic film conservation method - conservation <strong>of</strong> logs under removal <strong>of</strong> oxygen<br />
o after the storms in the 90´s the idea was born to store wood under removal <strong>of</strong> oxygen to set all<br />
3. Participants<br />
organism in an oxygen free and carbon dioxide rich atmosphere to avoid especially bark beetle<br />
attack.<br />
o considering the conservation <strong>of</strong> broad-leafed trees and conifers concerning the possible loss <strong>of</strong><br />
quality and other damages after storage.<br />
o In case <strong>of</strong> the broad-leafed trees the product was veneer, that should be bompared with<br />
products from fresh wood<br />
o the empirical study concerning the quality <strong>of</strong> conifer sawn wood produced from log that was<br />
stored in plastic film is going on.<br />
• Forest Administration <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg<br />
o Orderer and partner for communcation<br />
o Management <strong>of</strong> costs<br />
• Sawyers/Sawmill/Veneer producers<br />
o Customers representation<br />
o Partner for cooperation and Assessment <strong>of</strong> the products<br />
• Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg<br />
o Assessment and monitoring <strong>of</strong> changes <strong>of</strong> the quality and herewith the financial value <strong>of</strong> the<br />
stored logs<br />
4. Research period<br />
2000 - 2003<br />
26<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
Annexe 13 : Storm damaged forest: Efficient and safe harvesting and log<br />
conservation methods<br />
ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />
TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Ongoing experiment/research project<br />
THEME : 3.5.1 “Special methods; Log conservation under oxygen exclusion, compact pile wrapped in plastic<br />
sheets<br />
ORIGINAL TITLE : Versuchskonzept Folienlagerung als Wald- und Holzschutzmassnahme<br />
AUTHORS : D. Schleier; M. Wurster; Dr. G. Mahler<br />
PUBLICATION DATE: 2003<br />
ORGANISATION : Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg<br />
COUNTRY: Germany<br />
ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />
1.Introduction:<br />
The Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg was commissioned by the Forest Department <strong>of</strong> Baden-<br />
Württemberg. The following hypothesis was made:<br />
The wrapping <strong>of</strong> the wood, that was attacked by the bark beetles, can avoid the flight <strong>of</strong> the insects. Besides the<br />
beetles were killed as a consequence <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> oxygen inside the package. Thereby the more intensive way<br />
<strong>of</strong> plastic film storage could be an alternative for the use <strong>of</strong> insecticide.<br />
2.Methods:<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> this conservation method should serve to reach the following goal:<br />
Estimation <strong>of</strong> the surviving rate <strong>of</strong> wood damaging insects and fungi at conifer logs, that were stored without<br />
oxygen for different long times.<br />
Work steps:<br />
• Choice <strong>of</strong> research areas in regions with a high population <strong>of</strong> bark beetles.<br />
• Choice <strong>of</strong> conifer logs hard attacked by beetles. Test logs must be analysed with sampling methods in<br />
order to check the development <strong>of</strong> the bark beetle population (Number and specie <strong>of</strong> the different<br />
beetles).<br />
• 15 piles with a size <strong>of</strong> ca. 100-150 m3 logs should be wrapped oxygen pro<strong>of</strong> in a plastic film.<br />
• Some more piles (null-version) will be wrapped with a narrow net to avoid a further gradation <strong>of</strong><br />
insects.<br />
• The closed piles will be tested regularly for the content <strong>of</strong> oxygen an carbondioxygen, in order control<br />
the success <strong>of</strong> the conservation.<br />
• When the oxygen inside the piles sunk to non measurable values and the carbondioxygen rose - the<br />
piles will be opened again in defined lags.<br />
27<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
• With every pile opening there must be picked test logs from the null-version and tested analogue to the<br />
conserved samples<br />
• After the opening <strong>of</strong> the piles the chosen test logs must be controled for bark beetle attack again. The<br />
development stadium <strong>of</strong> dead and living beetles must be documented.<br />
• Changes in colour at the logs will be controled to see if blue stain, rotor other fungi are amplified in the<br />
wood without oxygen.<br />
• Wood pieces from different stored piles should be tested for the content <strong>of</strong> farina and for other domains<br />
3.Participants:<br />
• Forest Administration <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg<br />
o Orderer and partner for communcation<br />
o Management <strong>of</strong> costs<br />
• State Forest Executives<br />
o Choice <strong>of</strong> State Forest Offices for the tests<br />
o Organisation <strong>of</strong> the logs<br />
o Man power management<br />
• Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg<br />
o Leader <strong>of</strong> the tests<br />
o Dokumentation and monitoring <strong>of</strong> the piles<br />
• State Forest Offices<br />
4.Research period:<br />
o Organisation <strong>of</strong> contact persons in the <strong>of</strong>fices<br />
o Manipulation <strong>of</strong> the logs<br />
o Support by packaging and monitoring <strong>of</strong> the piles<br />
From March 2002 until March 2003<br />
28<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
Annexe 14 : Beech conservation under oxygen exclusion<br />
ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />
TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Ongoing experiment/research project<br />
THEME : 3.5.1 “Special methods; Log conservation under oxygen exclusion, compact pile wrapped in plastic<br />
sheets<br />
ORIGINAL TITLE : Qualitätsuntersuchungen bei folienkonservierten Furnierbuchen<br />
AUTHORS : T. Brammer ; M. Wurster; Dr. G. Mahler<br />
PUBLICATION DATE: 2002<br />
ORGANISATION : Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg<br />
COUNTRY: Germany<br />
ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />
1.Introduction:<br />
Storm “Lothar” caused a huge amount <strong>of</strong> wind thrown round wood, which had to be processed and preserved.<br />
Under instruction <strong>of</strong> the Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg about 3500m³ beech round wood for<br />
production <strong>of</strong> veneer were packed up for the “Danzer Veneer Company” into plastic film. Parts <strong>of</strong> the round<br />
wood were examined for different parameters in the Danzer factories <strong>of</strong> Kehl and Winsen after end <strong>of</strong><br />
preservation. The results and the grading data will be represented in the following chapters.<br />
2.Methods:<br />
• The goal <strong>of</strong> the research project is to document the grade <strong>of</strong> quality considering frontal and collateral<br />
discolorations for a conservation period <strong>of</strong> up to 16 month.<br />
• For the packaging <strong>of</strong> the piles there had been used plastic film that was welded to create an air pro<strong>of</strong><br />
atmosphere inside the packed piles.<br />
• The 3500m³ beech logs were packed up in 38 piles wrapped in plastic film. The size <strong>of</strong> the piles was 50 to<br />
150m³.<br />
• After the storage period the piles were unpacked to document and assess the exterior and interior wood<br />
quality. Here the concentration <strong>of</strong> the assessment was the development <strong>of</strong> possible discolorations, cracks<br />
caused by the conservation and on the other hand caused by the storm.<br />
3.Participants:<br />
• Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg<br />
o Leader <strong>of</strong> the tests<br />
o Documentation and monitoring <strong>of</strong> the piles<br />
• Veneer Mill Danzer/Kehl<br />
4.Research period:<br />
o Buyer <strong>of</strong> the test wood<br />
End <strong>of</strong> 1999 until June 2000<br />
29<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
30<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
Annexe 15: Root rot in water stored piles<br />
ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Research project<br />
TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Ongoing experiment/research project<br />
THEME : 3.2.1 Water Storage; Compact pile with water sprinkling/spraying (logs with bark)<br />
ORIGINAL TITLE : Auftreten und Ausbreitung von Hallimasch in Beregnungspoltern<br />
AUTHORS : M. Groß; B. Metzler<br />
PUBLICATION DATE: 1995<br />
ORGANISATION : Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg<br />
COUNTRY: Germany<br />
ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />
1. Introduction:<br />
In the early 90s there were several research projects concerning water storage. Especially in the present case the<br />
project is dealing with the attack <strong>of</strong> root rot (armillaria mellea s.l.) in water stored log piles.<br />
2. Methods:<br />
a. There were analysed piles in practical conditions:<br />
One test pile was applied in april/may 1990 in Freiburg Kappel. There was a permanent control <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sprinkling site. Single logs were taken out <strong>of</strong> the pile to analyse them in detail. With a random test was<br />
tested per pile every meter <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> the stem. There were acquired parts <strong>of</strong> the stem with less<br />
mechanical strength and the max. depth <strong>of</strong> the destroyed area.<br />
b. There were analysed piles in laboratory conditions:<br />
There was made tests over a period <strong>of</strong> 6 weeks with 168 quadrates <strong>of</strong> spruce sapwood (6 x 6cm). They<br />
were detracted from wood <strong>of</strong> piles that was stored over a period <strong>of</strong> 3 years. These test objects were<br />
treated with moisture and heat and then infected with rot root.<br />
3. Results<br />
a. With good sprinkling quality, in case <strong>of</strong> spruce and fir conservation, there is not excluded that after a<br />
period <strong>of</strong> 3 years an attack <strong>of</strong> root rot is probable<br />
b. The destruction <strong>of</strong> the wood is limited partly on the stem surface and on the peripheral area <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sapwood<br />
c. In the 4 th year there is <strong>ongoing</strong> intensive attack <strong>of</strong> root rot<br />
d. There is no sign <strong>of</strong> dependence on place, tree specie, dimension, moisture content and altitude<br />
4. Research period:<br />
Beginning <strong>of</strong> the 1990s, when the storm Wiebke caused a conservation problem.<br />
31<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
Annexe 16 : Log conservation<br />
ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />
TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Ongoing experiment / Research project<br />
THEME : Log conservation - 1. Basic principles<br />
Log conservation - 2. General considerations<br />
Log conservation - 3. Conservation methods<br />
ORIGINAL TITLE : Rundholzlagerung<br />
AUTHORS : (various)<br />
PUBLICATION DATE : 2000<br />
ORGANISATION : EMPA<br />
COUNTRY : Switzerland<br />
ABSTRACT CONTENT :<br />
National research programme consisting <strong>of</strong> 4 projects started after the Dec. 1999 storms<br />
Projects:<br />
1. Co-ordination / integration <strong>of</strong> earlier and international experience<br />
2. Experience with different log conservation methods<br />
3. Entomology (Xylosandrus germanus)<br />
4. Wood quality monitoring by ultrasonic<br />
Overall objectives:<br />
1. Collection and analysis <strong>of</strong> the 'Lothar'-experiences from a scientific, economic, social and political<br />
point <strong>of</strong> view<br />
2. Compilation <strong>of</strong> a decision help to cope with future damage events (e.g. revision <strong>of</strong> 'Forest damage<br />
manual' and 'Decision help for storm damage in the forest')<br />
Contact:<br />
Martin ARNOLD<br />
Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research (EMPA)<br />
Wood Department<br />
Ueberlandstr. 129<br />
CH-8600 Duebendorf<br />
Switzerland<br />
Phone: +41-1-823-46-83<br />
Fax: +41-1-821-62-44<br />
E-Mail: Martin.Arnold@EMPA.CH<br />
32<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
ABSTRACT SUBMITTED BY / DATE : Martin Arnold, EMPA / 2003-02-14<br />
33<br />
Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />
Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />
(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)
Annexe 17: Susceptibility <strong>of</strong> harvested s<strong>of</strong>twoods to infection by sapstaining<br />
fungi<br />
ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />
TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Scientific publication<br />
THEME : Conservation 1.2 and Conservation 3.4.1<br />
ORIGINAL TITLE : Susceptibility <strong>of</strong> harvested s<strong>of</strong>twoods to infection by sap-staining fungi.<br />
AUTHORS : E. J. Young, R. A. Eaton and J. F. Webber<br />
PUBLICATION DATE: 2002<br />
ORGANISATION : International Research Group on Wood Preservation Doc. IRG/WP 02-10435 (IRG<br />
Secretariat, SE-100 44 Stockholm)<br />
COUNTRY: England<br />
ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />
In the UK a field study programme was carried out to compare the susceptibility <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>twood timber from five<br />
different commercially important tree species to infection by sap-stain fungi. Logs cut from freshly felled Scots<br />
pine (Pinus sylvestris), Lodgepole pine (P. contorta var. latifolia), Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis), Norway spruce<br />
(P. abies) and Japanese larch (Larix leptolepis) were exposed for 4 months (April to August 2001). Samples were<br />
taken 5cm and 50cm from the end <strong>of</strong> the logs after four weeks, eight weeks and 16 weeks. The percentage<br />
surface area <strong>of</strong> sap-stain was then measured in all samples, and isolations taken from the stained wood to identify<br />
the fungi causing discoloration. Sap-stain was markedly greater in the two pine species compared with the three<br />
other species. We concluded that the susceptibility <strong>of</strong> the tested tree species was as follows: Lodgepole pine =<br />
Scots pine > Norway spruce > Japanese larch > Sitka spruce. In the 5cm samples assessed after four months this<br />
equated to a mean stain area <strong>of</strong> 59%, 61%, 10%, 4% and