01.03.2013 Views

Deliverable 6: List of ongoing experiments - Ctba

Deliverable 6: List of ongoing experiments - Ctba

Deliverable 6: List of ongoing experiments - Ctba

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>List</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>ongoing</strong> <strong>experiments</strong><br />

<strong>Deliverable</strong> D6<br />

STODAFOR – Storm Damaged Forests : efficient and safe<br />

harvesting and log conservation methods<br />

May 2003<br />

Didier Pischedda, CTBA, France<br />

Emmanuel Bastet, CTBA, France<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), Afocel (F), TUD (D), BRE (UK),<br />

FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


Participants:<br />

This European project is currently carried out by the following 16 partners under the global<br />

coordination <strong>of</strong> CTBA.<br />

CTBA, Technical Institute for Wood Technology and Furniture Manufacture (France):<br />

Didier Pischedda – Coordinator<br />

Emmanuel Bastet<br />

FVA, Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Wuerttemberg (Germany): Gerold Mahler<br />

Manuela Bacher<br />

Christian Pfeil<br />

KVL, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University (Denmark): Andreas Bergstedt<br />

EMPA, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research (Switzerland): Martin Arnold<br />

CBE, Biomass Centre for Energy (Portugal): Joana Carinhas<br />

BFH, Bundesforschungsanstalt für Forst- und Holzwirtschaft (Germany) : Rolf-Dieter Peek<br />

UPM, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid (Spain): Eduardo Tolosona<br />

DLFRI, Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute (Denmark): Ebbe Boellehuus<br />

TTI, Trees and Timber Institute (Italy): Claudio Pollini<br />

Claudia Nati<br />

Lorenzo Valenti<br />

AFOCEL, Association Forêt Cellulose (France): Maryse Bigot<br />

Jérôme Moreau<br />

TUD, Technical University Dresden (Germany): Claus-Thomas Bues<br />

BRE, Building Research Establishment (UK): Keith Maun<br />

FMRE, Institute <strong>of</strong> Forest and Mountain Risk Engineering (Austria): Ewald Pertlik<br />

ICSTM, The Imperial College <strong>of</strong> Science Technology and Medicine (UK): David Dickinson<br />

UOP, University <strong>of</strong> Portsmouth Higher Education Corporation (UK): Rodney Eaton<br />

NISK, Norsk Institutt for Skogforskning (Norway): Jan Bjerketvedt<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)<br />

2


Contents<br />

Participants: 2<br />

1. Objectives 4<br />

2. General comments 4<br />

3. <strong>List</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>ongoing</strong> <strong>experiments</strong> 4<br />

3.1. France 4<br />

3.2. Germany 5<br />

3.3. Switzerland 6<br />

3.4. United kingdom 6<br />

4. Patents 6<br />

5. Conclusion 7<br />

Annexes 8<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)<br />

3


1. Objectives<br />

The main objective <strong>of</strong> Workpackage 4 was to make out a list <strong>of</strong> the <strong>ongoing</strong> research and<br />

<strong>experiments</strong> started after December 1999.<br />

2. General comments<br />

All the partners were involved in this work. Nevertheless, only 4 countries launched some<br />

research following this event since many <strong>of</strong> them such as the UK, Spain, Portugal, Norway<br />

and the Netherlands were not affected by the storm. The numbers <strong>of</strong> <strong>ongoing</strong> research is the<br />

following:<br />

• France : 10<br />

• Germany : 5<br />

• Switzerland : 2<br />

• Great Britain : 1<br />

Due to the rather late date <strong>of</strong> the project’s “kick-<strong>of</strong>f” (November 2001), most <strong>of</strong> the <strong>ongoing</strong><br />

research were launched before any common harmonised procedures were ready for use,<br />

especially with regard to log conservation. But the fact remains that the work out <strong>of</strong> these<br />

common procedures will greatly improved the exchange between countries in the future.<br />

3. <strong>List</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>ongoing</strong> <strong>experiments</strong><br />

3.1. France<br />

Institute Title Description / remarks Annexe<br />

CTBA<br />

CTBA,<br />

ONF,<br />

DERF<br />

CTBA,<br />

INRA,<br />

LRBB<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> the beech (Fagus<br />

sylvatica) properties and more<br />

precisely its coloration following a<br />

period <strong>of</strong> immersion and water<br />

spraying<br />

Comparison between logs conserved<br />

under water spraying conditions and<br />

green timbers in terms <strong>of</strong> sawing,<br />

drying, and planing processes, and in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> environmental and trade<br />

issues<br />

Assessment and improvement <strong>of</strong> live<br />

conservation method <strong>of</strong> blown trees<br />

for beech (Fagus sylvatica)<br />

Experimental site for maritime<br />

pine’s log conservation (Pinus<br />

Pinaster) using three different<br />

methods<br />

Objectives:⇒ Colour assessment<br />

⇒ Assessment <strong>of</strong> the ‘steaming’ process<br />

⇒ Assessment <strong>of</strong> rotary cutting <strong>of</strong> veneer<br />

⇒ Environmental impacts (PH, COD,<br />

Nitrogen, BOD)<br />

Objectives: Comparison between green and ‘water<br />

sprayed’ logs in terms <strong>of</strong> :<br />

⇒ sawing/planing process<br />

⇒ Kiln drying process<br />

⇒ Environmental impacts<br />

Objectives:<br />

⇒ Assessment <strong>of</strong> the wood quality <strong>of</strong> live conserved<br />

trees (according to the CTBA’s protocol and in term<br />

<strong>of</strong> economical loss)<br />

⇒ Assessment <strong>of</strong> the wax application method on the<br />

faces<br />

Goals: ⇒ Assessment <strong>of</strong> the mechanical properties<br />

(MOE, MOR) using non destructive methods<br />

⇒ Environmental impacts (PH, COD,<br />

Nitrogen, BOD, toxicity)<br />

⇒ Assessment <strong>of</strong> the industrial site<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)<br />

4<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4


AFOCEL<br />

CTBA<br />

LEF<br />

(Economic<br />

Laboratory<br />

<strong>of</strong> Forestry<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

ENGREF)<br />

Storage <strong>of</strong> logs under water<br />

sprinklers: Regulations, technical<br />

and economical aspects<br />

Blue staining in maritime pine<br />

(Pinus Pinaster) windthrown stored<br />

on site<br />

Fibres quality <strong>of</strong> maritime pine<br />

windthrowns stored on site and<br />

under water sprinkling<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> beech (Fagus<br />

sylvatica) storage under humid<br />

conditions: compact piles covered<br />

with plastic sheets (PVC) and<br />

polyethylene sheets<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> storage under drying<br />

conditions (compact pile/ log<br />

debarked) <strong>of</strong> spruce (Picea abies)<br />

and fir (abies alba)<br />

Log conservation in France by water<br />

spraying/ economic issues<br />

3.2. Germany<br />

Description <strong>of</strong> the French regulations, the equipment<br />

and the economical aspects that need to be taken into<br />

account to implement a water sprayed site<br />

Monitoring <strong>of</strong> the evolution <strong>of</strong> blue staining in<br />

windthrown maritime pine stored on site for 10<br />

months<br />

Moisture content, pulping yield and kraft parper<br />

properties were assessed every month for 3 different<br />

type <strong>of</strong> conservation: on site; wet storage and dry<br />

storage<br />

Thanks to a special device, the logs were regularly and<br />

visually monitored as well as the moisture content in<br />

each batch within a 2 years period.<br />

After a 6 months period <strong>of</strong> storage, 2% loss in yield<br />

and 18.5% economic loss due to downgrading <strong>of</strong> the<br />

raw material<br />

Goals: ⇒ Economic assessment <strong>of</strong> log conserved<br />

under water spraying<br />

⇒ Assessment <strong>of</strong> the industrial site<br />

Institute Title Description / remarks Annexe<br />

FVA<br />

Log conservation under oxygen<br />

exclusion / Oxygen exclusion<br />

method: 2000-2001<br />

Storm damaged forest: Efficient and<br />

safe harvesting and log conservation<br />

methods - 1<br />

Storm damaged forest: Efficient and<br />

safe harvesting and log conservation<br />

methods - 2<br />

Beech conservation under oxygen<br />

exclusion<br />

Root rot in water stored piles<br />

Goals: improvement <strong>of</strong> the method for fir, larch,<br />

Norway spruce, beech, Douglas fir (assessment for<br />

sawmill and veneer mill quality)<br />

Objective: conservation <strong>of</strong> logs wrapped with plastic<br />

film under realistic conditions (e.g. 2500 m3 beech<br />

roundwood for production <strong>of</strong> veneer were packed up<br />

for industries in plastic film)<br />

Objective: storage under plastic films: estimation <strong>of</strong><br />

the surviving rate <strong>of</strong> wood damaging insects and fungi<br />

at conifer logs, that were stored without oxygen for<br />

different long times.<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> beech conservation under oxygen<br />

exclusion during a 16 months period in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

discoloration, cracks and exterior and interior wood<br />

quality<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> root rot evolution under water<br />

sprinkling conservation on Spruce and Fir<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)<br />

5<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15


3.3. Switzerland<br />

Institute Title Description / Remarks Annexe<br />

EMPA<br />

Study <strong>of</strong> extent, detection, cause and<br />

consequences <strong>of</strong> compression<br />

failures<br />

Collection and analysis <strong>of</strong> current<br />

experiences with different methods<br />

3.4. United kingdom<br />

Wood utilisation: wood properties, grading, early<br />

detection, modelling <strong>of</strong> damage mechanisms<br />

Log conservation, entomology, wood quality<br />

monitoring by ultrasonic<br />

Institute Title Description / Remarks Annexe<br />

UOP<br />

4. Patents<br />

Susceptibility <strong>of</strong> harvested<br />

s<strong>of</strong>twoods to infection by sapstaining<br />

fungi<br />

Susceptibility <strong>of</strong> 5 s<strong>of</strong>twood species to blue stain 17<br />

With regard to the patents, 2 patent applications were filed concerning logs conserved under<br />

oxygen exclusion (log piles wrapped in plastic sheets). One is French and the other is<br />

German.<br />

The German patent has been filed by the Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg<br />

(FVA) and the Technical University <strong>of</strong> Dresden (TUD). It is an European Patent under the<br />

Publication-Number: 0946340. This latter was published in the paper 'Patentblatt',<br />

14.11.2001.<br />

The inventors are the following: Dr. Gerold Mahler, Kirchzarten<br />

Christoph Richter, Tharandt<br />

Dr. Martin Groß, Freiburg<br />

Andreas Weber, Tharandt<br />

Thomas Maier, Gundelfingen<br />

Jürgen, König, Tharandt<br />

Concerning the French pattern, the name <strong>of</strong> the French owner company, is STEP.<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)<br />

16<br />

6


5. Conclusion<br />

Although only 4 countries launched some <strong>experiments</strong> following the storm in December<br />

1999, no doubt that the works described throughout this deliverable, will greatly improved the<br />

understanding and the efficiency in terms <strong>of</strong> global management when undergoing such<br />

storm. With regard to France, the greater number <strong>of</strong> <strong>experiments</strong> is probably due to the fact<br />

that France was poorly involved in the big storm in 1990 whereas Germany had to stand up to<br />

millions <strong>of</strong> destroyed hectares. Concerning the other countries, the low number <strong>of</strong> launched<br />

<strong>experiments</strong> is simply due to the fact that these latter suffered only slightly from this storm.<br />

Following this bibliographical work, a more active phase becomes possible i.e. figuring out<br />

the remaining unsolved questions (D5) and the relevant additional <strong>experiments</strong> which<br />

deserved to be launched in the future (D7). This deliverable is also an important step towards<br />

a better cooperation between the European countries where many research remained unknown<br />

from a country to another.<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)<br />

7


Annexes<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)<br />

8


Annexe 1 : Assessment <strong>of</strong> the beech (Fagus sylvatica) properties and<br />

more precisely its coloration following a period <strong>of</strong> immersion and water<br />

spraying<br />

Intermediary report<br />

ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />

TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Ongoing experiment/ research project<br />

THEME : Conservation 3.2.1. Water storage, compact pile with water sprinkling/spraying (logs with<br />

bark)<br />

Conservation 3.2.2. Water storage. Ponding/Immersion (log with bark)<br />

ORIGINAL TITLE : Evolution des propriétés du bois de hêtre et plus particulièrement sa coloration lors de<br />

conservation par immersion et aspersion.<br />

AUTHORS : J.L. Bonnet, J. Mirjolet<br />

PUBLICATION DATE: <strong>ongoing</strong><br />

ORGANISATION : CTBA, ONF<br />

COUNTRY: France<br />

ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />

This project deals with the conservation <strong>of</strong> beech (Fagus sylvatica) under water storage (water spraying and<br />

immersion). It is expected to last 2 years and it consists in an examination <strong>of</strong> the planks sawn from the conserved<br />

logs. Some planks were steamed. Some veneers were also cut and examined.<br />

The first results are the following:<br />

• The immersed logs are darker in colour than the water sprayed ones.<br />

• After 13 months, immersed logs are heterogeneous in colour. During the kiln drying,<br />

some wide stains appeared under the sticks. These defects do not occur after a 6<br />

months period <strong>of</strong> water spraying.<br />

• In terms <strong>of</strong> colour, the water sprayed logs are better conserved than the immersed logs.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> immersed wood, the discoloration starts from 1 month after the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> the storage. Concerning water sprayed logs, discoloration occurs from<br />

the 6 th month <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />

• The steamed planks present homogeneous colour and are barely distinguishable from<br />

the planks coming from green logs. The steaming process seems to be achieved more<br />

quickly than for green wood (the necessary time for the steaming process decreases by<br />

15 to 20% for water sprayed logs and by 20 to 25% for the immersed logs)<br />

• The veneer manufacture occurred without particular problems apart from a small<br />

percentage attacked by fungi.<br />

The following first conclusions may be drawn from these results:<br />

• It does not seem possible to obtain planks clear in colour with water storage methods<br />

as far as beech is concerned.<br />

• Steaming process is an appropriate method to make planks homogeneous in colour.<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)<br />

9


• With regard to the environment, PH, COD value (Chemical oxygen demand), nitrogen<br />

value and O2 content were measured. No pollution was obvious. On the contrary,<br />

water quality seemed to be enhanced in the case <strong>of</strong> immersion.<br />

10<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


Annexe2 : Comparison between logs conserved under water spraying<br />

conditions and green timbers in terms <strong>of</strong> sawing, drying, and planing<br />

processes, and in terms <strong>of</strong> environmental and trade issues<br />

ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />

TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Ongoing experiment/ research project<br />

THEME : Conservation 3.2.1. Water storage, compact pile with water sprinkling/spraying (logs with bark)<br />

ORIGINAL TITLE : Comparaison entre la transformation des bois conservés sous aspersion et celle des bois<br />

frais (Sciage, séchage, rabottage, intérêt environnemental, aspect commercial)<br />

AUTHORS : Vautherin P., Snieg O., Bastet E.<br />

PUBLICATION DATE: <strong>ongoing</strong><br />

ORGANISATION : CTBA<br />

COUNTRY: France<br />

ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to determine the differences between green timbers and logs conserved under water<br />

spraying in terms <strong>of</strong> environmental and economical issues and in terms <strong>of</strong> management throughout the sawing,<br />

planing and drying processes.<br />

The work is currently carried out within French companies. Three species are examined, namely oak (Quercus<br />

Spp) for hardwoods and fir (Abies Spp) and spruce (Picea Abies) for s<strong>of</strong>twoods. The study is expected to last 2<br />

years from 2002 to 2004.<br />

At that moment, oak has been the only species studied with regard to the sawing process. This work was<br />

performed in the sawmills at an industrial rate. The following data were measured: moisture content, energy<br />

consumption, blade wear, cutting speed, cutting height , nodosity. At that point, 4 main conclusions may be<br />

drawn from the study:<br />

1. Whatever the wood type (water sprayed or green timbers) and the cutting height, the energy consumption<br />

remains more or less the same. This phenomenon may be explained by the fact that the sawyer always tends<br />

to have the same cutting resistance. In other words, for a same type <strong>of</strong> timber, the thicker is the sawn board,<br />

the slower it is sawn, but the energy consumption remains the same. The difference in energy consumption<br />

between fresh and water sprayed logs ranges from 1% to 6% depending on the sawmills.<br />

2. The influence <strong>of</strong> the nodosity is negligible compared to the thickness <strong>of</strong> the board (100 times smaller)<br />

3. In the same way, the influence <strong>of</strong> the blade wear is negligible compared to the thickness <strong>of</strong> the board.<br />

Nevertheless, a significant decrease in speed <strong>of</strong> the sawing process occurs while the wear blade increases.<br />

4. At an equal energy consumption level and for the same log diameter, the speed <strong>of</strong> the sawing process seems<br />

to be 10% to 20% higher for the water sprayed logs than for the green logs. However, it should be noticed<br />

that the time spent by the blade into the wood (which is the time measured in the study) represents 25% <strong>of</strong><br />

the total sawing process (sawing + movement <strong>of</strong> the bogie carriage for log saw + log turning)<br />

Some general observations have also been made:<br />

• Debarking: easier but the size <strong>of</strong> the bark pieces is also bigger and they can obstruct or clog up the debarker.<br />

11<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


• Immediately after the sawing process, the boards issued from the water sprayed logs seem to be slightly<br />

darker. Besides, this difference tends to disappear following the drying process.<br />

• On a logistic point <strong>of</strong> view, it seems that the benefits involved by this conservation method are significant.<br />

Actually, this latter prevents the wood from deteriorating during spring time (dote, mould, brown striped,<br />

etc.) and being downgraded.<br />

12<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


Annexe 3 : Assessment and improvement <strong>of</strong> live conservation method <strong>of</strong><br />

blown trees for beech (Fagus sylvatica)<br />

ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />

TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Project report<br />

THEME : 3. Conservation methods; 3.1. On site conservation ; 3.1.1. live conservation <strong>of</strong> blown trees<br />

3.6. Chemical wood protection<br />

ORIGINAL TITLE : Suivi et amélioration de deux techniques de conservation du bois de hêtre en Meurthe et<br />

Moselle et en Haute Marne<br />

AUTHOR : I. Vinkler<br />

PUBLICATION DATE: August 2002<br />

ORGANISATION : CTBA, ONF, DERF<br />

COUNTRY: France<br />

ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />

This project deals with beech (fagus sylvatica) live conservation over a 2 years period. 704 blown trees were<br />

examined, scattered in two French regions (‘Meurthe et Moselle’ and ‘Haute Marne’). Just after the storm, these<br />

trees were still living since their roots were partly damaged or even not damaged at all.<br />

Concerning harvested logs, in order to slow down the drying speed <strong>of</strong> the logs, a method using wax on the faces,<br />

was also assessed.<br />

If the method involving wax is still used in France for oak in some cases, this technique seems totally inefficient<br />

for beech: the attacked log percentages remain exactly the same compared to the logs without wax on their faces.<br />

As far as live conservation is concerned, the general results are rather encouraging: after one year, the percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> attacked logs by fungi (involving an economical loss) ranges from 7% to 16% for scattered blown trees and<br />

around 30% for blown trees located in totally damaged area (i.e. exposed to 100% <strong>of</strong> the sunlight). After 2 years,<br />

the percentage <strong>of</strong> wood deterioration increases widely with regard to scattered blown trees, ranging from 27% to<br />

35% (average made for every sample area).<br />

With regard to paper pulp properties, these latter are strongly correlated with the moisture content. Therefore, an<br />

important decrease in pulp yield occurred during the second year following the December 1999 storm. This pulp<br />

yield decreased by 5% within the second spring/summer period. Nevertheless, the pulp properties following the<br />

first live conservation year remained good and steady.<br />

Among the factors likely to influence wood deterioration, the far most important is the sample area’s light level.<br />

The more the blown trees are exposed to the sunlight, the higher is the deterioration rate since the quicker<br />

decreases the moisture content. Other factors, such as the site type, the ground contact, the crown damages or the<br />

log diameter are negligible compared to the light level. However, the following observations were noticed:<br />

1. The effect <strong>of</strong> the log’s ground contact seems to influence the wood quality only the second year but<br />

remains negligible.<br />

2. The more the crown is damaged, the higher the deterioration rate.<br />

3. The bigger is the living tree’s diameter, the higher the deterioration rate. This trend is only obvious<br />

the second year <strong>of</strong> live conservation.<br />

4. When the tree falls down, the more its roots’ network is displaced, the higher the deterioration rate<br />

13<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


Conclusion:<br />

As far as beech is concerned and despite the fact that this species is likely to colour quickly, live conservation is<br />

a rather efficient and inexpensive method within the first year following the storm. It could even be worth using<br />

it during the second year provided that the blown trees are scattered in the forest (trees not or partly exposed to<br />

the sunlight).<br />

14<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


Annexe 4 : Experimental site for maritime pine’s log conservation (Pinus<br />

Pinaster) using three different methods<br />

Intermediary report<br />

ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />

TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Ongoing experiment/ research project<br />

THEME : Conservation 3.2.1. Water storage, compact pile with water sprinkling/spraying (logs with<br />

bark)<br />

Conservation 3.6. Chemical wood protection<br />

Conservation 3.2.2. Water storage. Ponding/Immersion (log with bark)<br />

ORIGINAL TITLE : Site atelier de conservation longue durée du pin maritime / Rapport intermédiaire<br />

AUTHORS : Anonymous.<br />

PUBLICATION DATE: <strong>ongoing</strong><br />

ORGANISATION : CTBA, INRA, Pine Institute, ONF, CEMAGREF, LRBB, AFOCEL, Xylomeca<br />

COUNTRY: France<br />

ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />

An experimental platform has been implemented in the South West <strong>of</strong> France (Aquitaine) to assess within a 3<br />

years period, the wood quality and the impact on the environment <strong>of</strong> the 3 different log conservation methods<br />

(water spraying, immersion, chemical treatment).<br />

The species involved is maritime pine (Pinus Pinaster). Slightly more than 2000m 3 are monitored, <strong>of</strong> which 15%<br />

<strong>of</strong> paper wood, 15% <strong>of</strong> blowndown timbers already deteriorated by fungi and 70% <strong>of</strong> fresh industrial wood.<br />

The following table summarises the timber volume involved depending on the wood type (paper wood, industrial<br />

wood, deteriorated wood) and the conservation methods used.<br />

Conservation methods Wood type Volume (m 3 )<br />

Water spraying<br />

Industrial wood 400<br />

Paper wood 325<br />

Attacked wood 150<br />

Immersion Industrial wood 125<br />

Chemical treatment Industrial wood 375<br />

Water spraying with recycling water<br />

system<br />

Witness<br />

Industrial wood 75<br />

Industrial wood 350<br />

Attacked wood 150<br />

With regard to the environment, the following data are measured: PH, conductivity, COD value (Chemical<br />

oxygen demand), BOD value (biological oxygen demand), nitrogen value, toxicity on luminescent bacteria<br />

called Vibrio Fisheri.<br />

15<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


As far as wood quality is concerned, 3 non destructive methods were tested and correlated to the results obtained<br />

with the usual destructive methods: ultrasound analysis (Sylvatest/ CTBA), vibrator analysis and resistance<br />

analysis. This latter is achieved thanks to a machine called ‘resistograph’ which measure the rate <strong>of</strong> penetrability<br />

<strong>of</strong> a screw into the wood in a diametrical direction.<br />

CTBA and AFOCEL have also carried out a survey among the south west industrial sites to gather information<br />

on equipment, costs and to assess the defects and the advantages <strong>of</strong> their wood conservation.<br />

Intermediary results:<br />

By a period <strong>of</strong> 2 years, the toxicity involved by the 3 different types <strong>of</strong> log conservation seems to remain low but<br />

fluctuates within the very first months.<br />

Concerning the wood quality, the association <strong>of</strong> the non destructive methods appears to be an efficient system to<br />

measure MOE and MOR since their results are well correlated with the ones obtained with destructive methods.<br />

Furthermore, it seems that the mechanical features do not degrade even after a 2 years conservation period <strong>of</strong><br />

time.<br />

The first results after 8 months showed that whereas most <strong>of</strong> the untreated logs were bluestained, 73 % to 100 %<br />

<strong>of</strong> water-immersed logs and 94 % to 100 % <strong>of</strong> water-sprayed logs were preserved with less than 6 % <strong>of</strong><br />

bluestained area. Moreover, neither preservation method led to a loss <strong>of</strong> modulus <strong>of</strong> elasticity or <strong>of</strong> rupture.<br />

16<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


Annexe 5 : Storage <strong>of</strong> logs under water sprinklers: Regulations, technical<br />

and economic aspects<br />

ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Common practice<br />

TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Technical publication<br />

THEME : Conservation 3.2.1. Water storage, compact pile with water sprinkling/spraying (logs with bark)<br />

ORIGINAL TITLE : Stockage des bois par aspersion. Aspects réglementaires, tecniques et économiques<br />

AUTHORS : J. Moreau (Afocel)<br />

PUBLICATION DATE: 2000<br />

ORGANISATION : Afocel, ENGREF-INRA, CEMAGREF<br />

COUNTRY: France<br />

ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />

After the storms that occurred in France in December 99, the amount <strong>of</strong> windthrown wood was estimated<br />

at 138 millions <strong>of</strong> m3 (accounting for 3 harvesting years in France).<br />

Various means were used in order to face with this huge incoming wood amounts before wood gets<br />

degrade. Harvesting means and rate <strong>of</strong> sawmills productions were increased, sawings were stored, round<br />

logs were exported and logs were stored under water sprinklers.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this document is to describe in concrete terms the storage <strong>of</strong> logs under water sprinklers.<br />

The first part screens the different storage methods (on site conservation, storage, at road side, under low oxygen<br />

atmosphere, underwater laying, under water sprinklers) and take stock for each method <strong>of</strong> the expected<br />

wood quality.<br />

In the second part, the storage under water sprinklers is then specifically approached and developed<br />

through technical and regulations aspects whose knowledge is essential to set up a storage place.<br />

The technical study <strong>of</strong> the storage (size <strong>of</strong> the water sprinkler system, ducts kinds, logs layout) is also<br />

approached through four concrete examples.<br />

In the end, a calculation methods <strong>of</strong> the storage costs and pr<strong>of</strong>itability analysis is<br />

presented. Spreadsheets files are available on the enclosed floppy disk.<br />

17<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


Annexe 6 : Blue staining in maritime pine wind-thrown (Pinus Pinaster)<br />

stored on site<br />

ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />

TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Ongoing experiment<br />

THEME : Conservation 3.1.1. : In situ storage, live conservation <strong>of</strong> wind-thrown trees<br />

ORIGINAL TITLE : Evolution du bleuissement des chablis de Pin maritime dans le massif Landais<br />

AUTHORS : J. Moreau (AFOCEL), J.R. Liarçou (CRPF Aquitaine)<br />

PUBLICATION DATE: 02/2001<br />

ORGANISATION : AFOCEL, CRPF<br />

COUNTRY: France<br />

ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />

After the hurricane that occurred in France in December 1999, the huge amount <strong>of</strong> wind-thrown wood involved phytosanitary<br />

hazards. In the short run, the most formidable threat <strong>of</strong> depreciation for saw-logs was the development <strong>of</strong> bluestain.<br />

Hence AFOCEL lead with CRPF a study in order to monitor the evolution <strong>of</strong> bluestain contamination in maritime pine windthrown<br />

stored on site in South West <strong>of</strong> France. Each month, from March to December 2000, the degree <strong>of</strong> bluestain<br />

development in wood was assessed on 600 fresh saw-logs selected just after felling on 20 damaged stands.<br />

The contamination <strong>of</strong> the wind-thrown trees remains limited. One year after the storm, 40% <strong>of</strong> saw logs observed were not<br />

contaminated by bluestain. Before the insects attacks occurred no bluestain damage was notice on logs on dry site but there<br />

were several logs contaminated on wet site. On such land trees contamination could have happen through broken roots. After<br />

insects attacks the contamination <strong>of</strong> the logs rapidly reach 60% on both type <strong>of</strong> site.<br />

If a storm occurred in winter season, we could make this simple recommendation: to harvest first wind thrown<br />

trees on wet sites and quickly before insects attacks.<br />

18<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


Annexe 7 : Conservation <strong>of</strong> maritime pine windthrown in the South<br />

West <strong>of</strong> France<br />

ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />

TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Ongoing experiment<br />

THEME : Conservation 3.2.1 : Water storage, compact pile with water sprinkling / spraying (logs with<br />

bark)<br />

Conservation 3.1.1 : In situ storage, live conservation <strong>of</strong> wind-thrown trees<br />

ORIGINAL TITLE : Qualité des fibres issues des bois de chablis de pin maritime<br />

AUTHORS : J. Moreau, P. Nougier, G. Chantre (AFOCEL)<br />

PUBLICATION DATE: mars 2002<br />

ORGANISATION : AFOCEL<br />

COUNTRY: France<br />

ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />

After the hurricane <strong>of</strong> December 99, 25 millions <strong>of</strong> m 3 <strong>of</strong> maritime pine windthrown wood were stored on-site in<br />

South West <strong>of</strong> France (accounting for three harvesting years). Various means were used to face this huge<br />

incoming wood amounts before wood gets degrade, like the increase <strong>of</strong> harvesting means and rate <strong>of</strong> sawmill<br />

production, exportation and storage <strong>of</strong> round logs.<br />

In South West <strong>of</strong> France, different methods were used to store the maritime pine windthrows. The different<br />

methods were (1) on site conservation <strong>of</strong> blown trees, (2) wet storage and (3) dry storage. Regarding the lack <strong>of</strong><br />

experience <strong>of</strong> such conservation techniques on maritime pine, a sampling procedure was adapted to follow up the<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> wood and fibre properties on the storage sites : moisture content, pulping yield and Kraft paper<br />

properties were assessed every month.<br />

Several years after the hurricane, significant experience and expertise is acquired. Blown trees stored on site<br />

were well preserved until the end <strong>of</strong> the first summer. Fibre and paper properties were firstly affected, then<br />

pulping yield, but much lower than harvested logs. The degradation between stands was heterogeneous, so that<br />

practical methods <strong>of</strong> selection should be set up to define different qualities <strong>of</strong> wood assortments. Two years after<br />

the hurricane, a major part <strong>of</strong> trees left on site could still be used for pulp and paper issues.<br />

The storage under water sprinkling, if it is well carried out, preserves the wood quality. After a 18 to 24 month<br />

period <strong>of</strong> wet storage, the quality <strong>of</strong> pulping logs <strong>of</strong> maritime pine is maintained. But the quality <strong>of</strong> debarked<br />

logs <strong>of</strong> maritime pine windthrows stored in compact piles can be worrying. The drying rate <strong>of</strong> these logs was not<br />

fast enough to ensure an optimal protection against the fungus attacks.<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> wood and fibre characteristics helps to understand the progressive and heterogeneous alteration <strong>of</strong><br />

the wood papermaking potential, and contributes to enhance the experience for the maritime pine log storage<br />

techniques.<br />

19<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


Annexe 8: Assessment <strong>of</strong> beech (Fagus sylvatica) storage under humid<br />

conditions: compact piles covered with plastic sheets (PVC) and<br />

polyethylene sheets<br />

ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />

TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Intermediary project report<br />

THEME : 3. Storage under humid conditions. 3.4.2. Compact pile covered with plastic sheets (logs with<br />

bark)<br />

3. Storage under humid conditions. 3.4.3. Compact pile covered with geo textile fabric (logs<br />

with bark)<br />

ORIGINAL TITLE : Suivi du sciage du hêtre chablis. Procédé de conservation du hêtre sous atmosphère<br />

confinée.<br />

AUTHORS : Y. Gorget; O. Snieg; P. Vautherin<br />

PUBLICATION DATE: February 2002<br />

ORGANISATION : CTBA, STIR-ONF<br />

COUNTRY: France<br />

ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />

This project deals with storage under humid conditions <strong>of</strong> beech (fagus sylvatica), namely ‘compact pile covered<br />

with plastic sheets’ (with oxygen exclusion) and ‘compact pile covered with polyethylene sheets’. The aim was<br />

to assess these methods in terms <strong>of</strong> wood quality. A first assessment was made 10 months after the beginning <strong>of</strong><br />

the conservation.<br />

1. Compact pile covered with plastic sheets<br />

With regard to the results obtained after kiln drying, no significant differences appeared between fresh timbers<br />

and beech conserved under compact piles covered with plastic sheets (PVC). Slightly less deformations in the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> beech wrapped in plastic sheets, final Moisture Content homogenous , drying time similar, no<br />

discoloration after sanding.<br />

Concerning mechanical and physical properties, a decrease by 15% seems to occur<br />

concerning the modulus <strong>of</strong> elasticity in flexion and 20% with regard to the modulus <strong>of</strong> rupture<br />

in flexion compared to the literature. Nevertheless, these results needs to be confirmed since<br />

no information was given concerning the wood quality and its origins. In other terms, no<br />

conclusion can be drawn from these results.<br />

As far as veneer manufacture is concerned, no particular difficulties were encountered during the process and the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> the veneer was similar to the one manufactured from fresh wood.<br />

Finally, concerning the visual aspects <strong>of</strong> the planks sawn from the conserved logs, 4% were stained (brown<br />

stains), 1.5% were attacked by white rot, no s<strong>of</strong>t rot attacks neither dote were obvious. In other terms, after 10<br />

months <strong>of</strong> conservation, the conserved logs were still in perfect conditions.<br />

2. compact pile covered with polyethylene sheets<br />

After 10 months <strong>of</strong> conservation, the overall results were quite bad (white rot attack, blue stain, bad bark<br />

condition, dote). This method should not be applied in the future to conserve beech.<br />

20<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


Annexe 9 : Assessment <strong>of</strong> storage under drying conditions (compact pile /<br />

log without barked) <strong>of</strong> spruce (Picea abies) and fir (Abies alba)<br />

ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />

TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Intermediary project report<br />

THEME : 3.3. Storage under drying conditions.<br />

ORIGINAL TITLE : Suivi du sciage de sapin epicéa chablis / grumes écorcées stockées sans arrosage<br />

AUTHORS : S. Faure; J. Parrot<br />

PUBLICATION DATE: January 2001<br />

ORGANISATION : CTBA, ONF<br />

COUNTRY: France<br />

ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />

This project deals with storage under drying conditions (compact pile / log without barked) <strong>of</strong> spruce (Picea<br />

abies) and fir (Abies alba).<br />

After a 6 months period <strong>of</strong> conservation, the measured loss in yield was 2% in average compared with the yield<br />

that would have been obtained with green sawn timbers. With regard to the economic loss due to downgrading <strong>of</strong><br />

the planks (according to the European standardisation), the average loss was 18.5% in prices.<br />

21<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


Annexe 10 : Log conservation in France by water spraying / Economic<br />

aspects<br />

ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />

TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Intermediary project report<br />

THEME : 2.1. Economic aspects<br />

3.2.1. Compact piles with water sprinkling (logs with bark)<br />

ORIGINAL TITLE : Le stockage des bois en France après les tempêtes de Lothar et Martin / Approche<br />

économique<br />

AUTHORS : S. Costa; L. Ibanez<br />

PUBLICATION DATE: 2003<br />

ORGANISATION : LEF (Economic Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Forestry <strong>of</strong> the ENGREF)<br />

COUNTRY: France<br />

ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />

Economic study <strong>of</strong> water sprinkling conservation method according to the type <strong>of</strong> companies (sawmill, forest<br />

owner, paper industry, trader-transport company, forester, etc.). This study also answers the species that have<br />

been conserved, the type <strong>of</strong> wood (industrial wood or lumber), the input and output on the storage yard, the<br />

grants that have been attributed by the government in terms <strong>of</strong> equipment, loan and transport.<br />

When nothing was previously done on site, the total cost <strong>of</strong> the conservation method based on 38 different sites<br />

and calculated over a 3 years period, is estimated to 13€/m 3 . Provided that the site is already built up, the cost<br />

would be 9€/m 3 . A recycling water system is expected to increase the price by 1.6€/m 3 in average.<br />

22<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


Annexe 11: Oxygen exclusion method: 2000-2001<br />

ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />

TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Ongoing experiment/research project<br />

THEME : 3.5.1 “Special methods; Log conservation under oxygen exclusion, compact pile wrapped in plastic<br />

sheets<br />

ORIGINAL TITLE : Konservierung von Sturmholz unter Sauerst<strong>of</strong>fabschluss 2000 und 2001<br />

AUTHORS : D. Schleier; M. Wurster; Dr. G. Mahler<br />

PUBLICATION DATE: 2003<br />

ORGANISATION : Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg<br />

COUNTRY: Germany<br />

ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />

1.Introduction:<br />

In the years 2000 and 2001 were made several tests concerning conservation <strong>of</strong> wood in<br />

plastic film. First it was necessary to teach the teams who should pack up the piles with the<br />

plastic film, in order to get an air pro<strong>of</strong> atmosphere inside the pile. Besides the teaching <strong>of</strong> the<br />

manipulation technique there must have been provided the tools and material for the packing.<br />

Then there were created plastic film protected piles in 7 different places in the south <strong>of</strong> the<br />

black forest.<br />

2.Methods:<br />

For the packing <strong>of</strong> the piles were needed special machines, that was provided by the Forest Administration <strong>of</strong><br />

Baden-Württemberg. The tools that were needed were inter alia welding apparatuses, gas measures and tools for<br />

technical manipulating <strong>of</strong> the plastic film roll. The piles were wrapped in plastic film first and afterwards welded<br />

to get an air pro<strong>of</strong> atmosphere inside the pile.<br />

3.Participants:<br />

Forest Offices:<br />

• Bad Liebenzell<br />

Spruce and fir 10.400m³ in 45 piles (230m³/pile)<br />

• Nordrach<br />

Spruce and Fir 8572m³ in 35 piles (245m³/pile)<br />

• Bad Peterstal<br />

Spruce and Fir 4300m³ in 22 piles (195m³/pile)<br />

• Durbach<br />

Beech veneer quality 3500m³ in 37 piles (95m³/pile)<br />

• Aalen<br />

Spruce 1600m³ in 11 piles (145m³/pile)<br />

• Bühl<br />

Larch and douglas fir 1260m³ in 7 piles (180m³/pile)<br />

23<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


• Kandern<br />

Spruce and fir 1000m³ in 4 piles (250m³/pile)<br />

4.Research period:<br />

The method named before were made in the period <strong>of</strong> the years 2000-2001<br />

24<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


Annexe 12 : Storm damaged forest: Efficient and safe harvesting and log<br />

conservation methods<br />

ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />

TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Ongoing experiment/research project<br />

THEME : 1.4 Basic principles ; Choice <strong>of</strong> conservation method<br />

2.4 General considerations; Management / Operation<br />

ORIGINAL TITLE : Holzlagerung/Konservierung (Darstellung der verschiedenen Lagermöglichkeiten nach<br />

Baumarten und deren Einsatz nach Lothar, Bewertung der Lagermöglichkeiten für verschiedene Baumarten<br />

AUTHORS : M. Wurster; Dr. G. Mahler<br />

PUBLICATION DATE: 2003<br />

ORGANISATION : Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg<br />

COUNTRY: Germany<br />

ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />

1. Introduction<br />

At the beginning <strong>of</strong> the year 2000 the Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg arranged a staff position<br />

storm "Lothar". The task was to consult state and private forest administration in a capacious way<br />

and to act as an information point. Afterwords there was started the project conservation <strong>of</strong> logs wrapped with<br />

plastic film under realistic conditions (e.g. 2500 m3 beech roundwood for production <strong>of</strong> veneer were packed up<br />

for industries in plastic film)<br />

2. Methods<br />

• Collection and administration <strong>of</strong> literature concerning subjects with log conservation (e.g. consultancy<br />

in<br />

questions <strong>of</strong> consequences <strong>of</strong> wet storage for the chemical water quality).<br />

• Controlling and consulting <strong>of</strong> "reclamation" cases concerning conserved wood from storage.<br />

• Documentation and estimation <strong>of</strong> wood damages after storage with protocols:<br />

1.Theme/problem<br />

2.Location<br />

3.Type <strong>of</strong> sample<br />

4.Result<br />

5.Conclusion<br />

• Composing <strong>of</strong> guidelines for practical use in storage areas.<br />

• Description <strong>of</strong> the different storage methods:<br />

o The goal <strong>of</strong> the wet storage is saving <strong>of</strong> quality and the conservation <strong>of</strong> value <strong>of</strong> permanent<br />

available log. Considering a long term and environmental aspects.<br />

25<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


o The idea with the plastic film conservation method is to test an alternative way to the wet<br />

storage.<br />

o Furthermore there will be made a monitoring <strong>of</strong> the reaction <strong>of</strong> the bark beetles under<br />

conditions in piles, that are wrapped with plastic film.<br />

• Assessment <strong>of</strong> the plastic film conservation method - conservation <strong>of</strong> logs under removal <strong>of</strong> oxygen<br />

o after the storms in the 90´s the idea was born to store wood under removal <strong>of</strong> oxygen to set all<br />

3. Participants<br />

organism in an oxygen free and carbon dioxide rich atmosphere to avoid especially bark beetle<br />

attack.<br />

o considering the conservation <strong>of</strong> broad-leafed trees and conifers concerning the possible loss <strong>of</strong><br />

quality and other damages after storage.<br />

o In case <strong>of</strong> the broad-leafed trees the product was veneer, that should be bompared with<br />

products from fresh wood<br />

o the empirical study concerning the quality <strong>of</strong> conifer sawn wood produced from log that was<br />

stored in plastic film is going on.<br />

• Forest Administration <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg<br />

o Orderer and partner for communcation<br />

o Management <strong>of</strong> costs<br />

• Sawyers/Sawmill/Veneer producers<br />

o Customers representation<br />

o Partner for cooperation and Assessment <strong>of</strong> the products<br />

• Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg<br />

o Assessment and monitoring <strong>of</strong> changes <strong>of</strong> the quality and herewith the financial value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

stored logs<br />

4. Research period<br />

2000 - 2003<br />

26<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


Annexe 13 : Storm damaged forest: Efficient and safe harvesting and log<br />

conservation methods<br />

ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />

TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Ongoing experiment/research project<br />

THEME : 3.5.1 “Special methods; Log conservation under oxygen exclusion, compact pile wrapped in plastic<br />

sheets<br />

ORIGINAL TITLE : Versuchskonzept Folienlagerung als Wald- und Holzschutzmassnahme<br />

AUTHORS : D. Schleier; M. Wurster; Dr. G. Mahler<br />

PUBLICATION DATE: 2003<br />

ORGANISATION : Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg<br />

COUNTRY: Germany<br />

ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />

1.Introduction:<br />

The Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg was commissioned by the Forest Department <strong>of</strong> Baden-<br />

Württemberg. The following hypothesis was made:<br />

The wrapping <strong>of</strong> the wood, that was attacked by the bark beetles, can avoid the flight <strong>of</strong> the insects. Besides the<br />

beetles were killed as a consequence <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> oxygen inside the package. Thereby the more intensive way<br />

<strong>of</strong> plastic film storage could be an alternative for the use <strong>of</strong> insecticide.<br />

2.Methods:<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> this conservation method should serve to reach the following goal:<br />

Estimation <strong>of</strong> the surviving rate <strong>of</strong> wood damaging insects and fungi at conifer logs, that were stored without<br />

oxygen for different long times.<br />

Work steps:<br />

• Choice <strong>of</strong> research areas in regions with a high population <strong>of</strong> bark beetles.<br />

• Choice <strong>of</strong> conifer logs hard attacked by beetles. Test logs must be analysed with sampling methods in<br />

order to check the development <strong>of</strong> the bark beetle population (Number and specie <strong>of</strong> the different<br />

beetles).<br />

• 15 piles with a size <strong>of</strong> ca. 100-150 m3 logs should be wrapped oxygen pro<strong>of</strong> in a plastic film.<br />

• Some more piles (null-version) will be wrapped with a narrow net to avoid a further gradation <strong>of</strong><br />

insects.<br />

• The closed piles will be tested regularly for the content <strong>of</strong> oxygen an carbondioxygen, in order control<br />

the success <strong>of</strong> the conservation.<br />

• When the oxygen inside the piles sunk to non measurable values and the carbondioxygen rose - the<br />

piles will be opened again in defined lags.<br />

27<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


• With every pile opening there must be picked test logs from the null-version and tested analogue to the<br />

conserved samples<br />

• After the opening <strong>of</strong> the piles the chosen test logs must be controled for bark beetle attack again. The<br />

development stadium <strong>of</strong> dead and living beetles must be documented.<br />

• Changes in colour at the logs will be controled to see if blue stain, rotor other fungi are amplified in the<br />

wood without oxygen.<br />

• Wood pieces from different stored piles should be tested for the content <strong>of</strong> farina and for other domains<br />

3.Participants:<br />

• Forest Administration <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg<br />

o Orderer and partner for communcation<br />

o Management <strong>of</strong> costs<br />

• State Forest Executives<br />

o Choice <strong>of</strong> State Forest Offices for the tests<br />

o Organisation <strong>of</strong> the logs<br />

o Man power management<br />

• Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg<br />

o Leader <strong>of</strong> the tests<br />

o Dokumentation and monitoring <strong>of</strong> the piles<br />

• State Forest Offices<br />

4.Research period:<br />

o Organisation <strong>of</strong> contact persons in the <strong>of</strong>fices<br />

o Manipulation <strong>of</strong> the logs<br />

o Support by packaging and monitoring <strong>of</strong> the piles<br />

From March 2002 until March 2003<br />

28<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


Annexe 14 : Beech conservation under oxygen exclusion<br />

ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />

TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Ongoing experiment/research project<br />

THEME : 3.5.1 “Special methods; Log conservation under oxygen exclusion, compact pile wrapped in plastic<br />

sheets<br />

ORIGINAL TITLE : Qualitätsuntersuchungen bei folienkonservierten Furnierbuchen<br />

AUTHORS : T. Brammer ; M. Wurster; Dr. G. Mahler<br />

PUBLICATION DATE: 2002<br />

ORGANISATION : Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg<br />

COUNTRY: Germany<br />

ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />

1.Introduction:<br />

Storm “Lothar” caused a huge amount <strong>of</strong> wind thrown round wood, which had to be processed and preserved.<br />

Under instruction <strong>of</strong> the Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg about 3500m³ beech round wood for<br />

production <strong>of</strong> veneer were packed up for the “Danzer Veneer Company” into plastic film. Parts <strong>of</strong> the round<br />

wood were examined for different parameters in the Danzer factories <strong>of</strong> Kehl and Winsen after end <strong>of</strong><br />

preservation. The results and the grading data will be represented in the following chapters.<br />

2.Methods:<br />

• The goal <strong>of</strong> the research project is to document the grade <strong>of</strong> quality considering frontal and collateral<br />

discolorations for a conservation period <strong>of</strong> up to 16 month.<br />

• For the packaging <strong>of</strong> the piles there had been used plastic film that was welded to create an air pro<strong>of</strong><br />

atmosphere inside the packed piles.<br />

• The 3500m³ beech logs were packed up in 38 piles wrapped in plastic film. The size <strong>of</strong> the piles was 50 to<br />

150m³.<br />

• After the storage period the piles were unpacked to document and assess the exterior and interior wood<br />

quality. Here the concentration <strong>of</strong> the assessment was the development <strong>of</strong> possible discolorations, cracks<br />

caused by the conservation and on the other hand caused by the storm.<br />

3.Participants:<br />

• Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg<br />

o Leader <strong>of</strong> the tests<br />

o Documentation and monitoring <strong>of</strong> the piles<br />

• Veneer Mill Danzer/Kehl<br />

4.Research period:<br />

o Buyer <strong>of</strong> the test wood<br />

End <strong>of</strong> 1999 until June 2000<br />

29<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


30<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


Annexe 15: Root rot in water stored piles<br />

ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Research project<br />

TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Ongoing experiment/research project<br />

THEME : 3.2.1 Water Storage; Compact pile with water sprinkling/spraying (logs with bark)<br />

ORIGINAL TITLE : Auftreten und Ausbreitung von Hallimasch in Beregnungspoltern<br />

AUTHORS : M. Groß; B. Metzler<br />

PUBLICATION DATE: 1995<br />

ORGANISATION : Forest Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Baden-Württemberg<br />

COUNTRY: Germany<br />

ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />

1. Introduction:<br />

In the early 90s there were several research projects concerning water storage. Especially in the present case the<br />

project is dealing with the attack <strong>of</strong> root rot (armillaria mellea s.l.) in water stored log piles.<br />

2. Methods:<br />

a. There were analysed piles in practical conditions:<br />

One test pile was applied in april/may 1990 in Freiburg Kappel. There was a permanent control <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sprinkling site. Single logs were taken out <strong>of</strong> the pile to analyse them in detail. With a random test was<br />

tested per pile every meter <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> the stem. There were acquired parts <strong>of</strong> the stem with less<br />

mechanical strength and the max. depth <strong>of</strong> the destroyed area.<br />

b. There were analysed piles in laboratory conditions:<br />

There was made tests over a period <strong>of</strong> 6 weeks with 168 quadrates <strong>of</strong> spruce sapwood (6 x 6cm). They<br />

were detracted from wood <strong>of</strong> piles that was stored over a period <strong>of</strong> 3 years. These test objects were<br />

treated with moisture and heat and then infected with rot root.<br />

3. Results<br />

a. With good sprinkling quality, in case <strong>of</strong> spruce and fir conservation, there is not excluded that after a<br />

period <strong>of</strong> 3 years an attack <strong>of</strong> root rot is probable<br />

b. The destruction <strong>of</strong> the wood is limited partly on the stem surface and on the peripheral area <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sapwood<br />

c. In the 4 th year there is <strong>ongoing</strong> intensive attack <strong>of</strong> root rot<br />

d. There is no sign <strong>of</strong> dependence on place, tree specie, dimension, moisture content and altitude<br />

4. Research period:<br />

Beginning <strong>of</strong> the 1990s, when the storm Wiebke caused a conservation problem.<br />

31<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


Annexe 16 : Log conservation<br />

ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />

TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Ongoing experiment / Research project<br />

THEME : Log conservation - 1. Basic principles<br />

Log conservation - 2. General considerations<br />

Log conservation - 3. Conservation methods<br />

ORIGINAL TITLE : Rundholzlagerung<br />

AUTHORS : (various)<br />

PUBLICATION DATE : 2000<br />

ORGANISATION : EMPA<br />

COUNTRY : Switzerland<br />

ABSTRACT CONTENT :<br />

National research programme consisting <strong>of</strong> 4 projects started after the Dec. 1999 storms<br />

Projects:<br />

1. Co-ordination / integration <strong>of</strong> earlier and international experience<br />

2. Experience with different log conservation methods<br />

3. Entomology (Xylosandrus germanus)<br />

4. Wood quality monitoring by ultrasonic<br />

Overall objectives:<br />

1. Collection and analysis <strong>of</strong> the 'Lothar'-experiences from a scientific, economic, social and political<br />

point <strong>of</strong> view<br />

2. Compilation <strong>of</strong> a decision help to cope with future damage events (e.g. revision <strong>of</strong> 'Forest damage<br />

manual' and 'Decision help for storm damage in the forest')<br />

Contact:<br />

Martin ARNOLD<br />

Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research (EMPA)<br />

Wood Department<br />

Ueberlandstr. 129<br />

CH-8600 Duebendorf<br />

Switzerland<br />

Phone: +41-1-823-46-83<br />

Fax: +41-1-821-62-44<br />

E-Mail: Martin.Arnold@EMPA.CH<br />

32<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


ABSTRACT SUBMITTED BY / DATE : Martin Arnold, EMPA / 2003-02-14<br />

33<br />

Project Coordinator : CTBA, 10 avenue de Saint Mandé 75012 Paris, www.ctba.fr/stodafor/index.htm<br />

Project partners : FVA (D), KVL (DK), EMPA (CH), CBE (P), BFH (D), UPM (E), DLFRI ( DK), TTI (I), AFOCEL (F), TUD (D), BRE<br />

(UK), FMRE (A), ICSTM ( UK), UOP (UK), NISK (N)


Annexe 17: Susceptibility <strong>of</strong> harvested s<strong>of</strong>twoods to infection by sapstaining<br />

fungi<br />

ABSTRACT CONCERNING : Ongoing research project<br />

TYPE OF DOCUMENT : Scientific publication<br />

THEME : Conservation 1.2 and Conservation 3.4.1<br />

ORIGINAL TITLE : Susceptibility <strong>of</strong> harvested s<strong>of</strong>twoods to infection by sap-staining fungi.<br />

AUTHORS : E. J. Young, R. A. Eaton and J. F. Webber<br />

PUBLICATION DATE: 2002<br />

ORGANISATION : International Research Group on Wood Preservation Doc. IRG/WP 02-10435 (IRG<br />

Secretariat, SE-100 44 Stockholm)<br />

COUNTRY: England<br />

ABSTRACT CONTENT:<br />

In the UK a field study programme was carried out to compare the susceptibility <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>twood timber from five<br />

different commercially important tree species to infection by sap-stain fungi. Logs cut from freshly felled Scots<br />

pine (Pinus sylvestris), Lodgepole pine (P. contorta var. latifolia), Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis), Norway spruce<br />

(P. abies) and Japanese larch (Larix leptolepis) were exposed for 4 months (April to August 2001). Samples were<br />

taken 5cm and 50cm from the end <strong>of</strong> the logs after four weeks, eight weeks and 16 weeks. The percentage<br />

surface area <strong>of</strong> sap-stain was then measured in all samples, and isolations taken from the stained wood to identify<br />

the fungi causing discoloration. Sap-stain was markedly greater in the two pine species compared with the three<br />

other species. We concluded that the susceptibility <strong>of</strong> the tested tree species was as follows: Lodgepole pine =<br />

Scots pine > Norway spruce > Japanese larch > Sitka spruce. In the 5cm samples assessed after four months this<br />

equated to a mean stain area <strong>of</strong> 59%, 61%, 10%, 4% and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!