01.03.2013 Views

Buenos Aires, Argentina - IUCN

Buenos Aires, Argentina - IUCN

Buenos Aires, Argentina - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Annex 7<br />

Opening Address by the Director General of<br />

WWF International, Dr Claude Martin<br />

I highly appreciate the opportunity to address a few<br />

words to you, as a representative of the three partner<br />

organizations in Caring for the Earth (CFE) and as the<br />

new Director General of WWF-International.<br />

This General Assembly is the first after the launch<br />

of Caring for the Earth and UNCED—events that left<br />

the world with useful agendas, but at the same time<br />

with considerable doubts about the commitment to<br />

necessary change. When crises in parts of Africa,<br />

Bosnia and Eastern Europe and the recession in many<br />

countries are occupying the minds of people and the<br />

attention of political leaders, it is crucially important<br />

to maintain momentum.<br />

In such times the danger prevails that social and<br />

economic developments are disconnected from the<br />

resource base and environmental contexts. It is critical<br />

that the commitment by governments to integrate<br />

sustainability into socio-economic decision-making<br />

through Agenda 21, the Conventions on Biological<br />

Diversity and Climate Change soon materialize and it<br />

is unacceptable that in some cases commitments have<br />

simply resulted in relabelling existing development<br />

aid without increasing levels.<br />

In late December the conclusion of the Uruguay<br />

Round made headline news. Yet little was written<br />

about the failure of the GATT negotiators to incorporate<br />

an Environment Committee into the new and<br />

powerful World Trade Organization. This omission is<br />

a sad commentary on the international community's<br />

commitment to implement the Rio Agreements and a<br />

challenge to the whole environmental movement to<br />

rectify the situation before the Round is formally<br />

signed in April.<br />

The preparatory process for UNCED echoed CFE<br />

in pointing out to the world what needs to be done in<br />

order to achieve sustainable development in terms of<br />

"improving the quality of human life while living<br />

within the carrying capacity of the ecosystems which<br />

support life". But maybe CFE's modern and practical<br />

98<br />

definition of "sustainable development" was published<br />

rather too late to become the accepted, official basis<br />

for the UNCED process—a process which remained<br />

largely based on the earlier definition of the Brundtland<br />

Commission, with its obvious limitations.<br />

It is reassuring, on the other hand, that both the<br />

European Parliament and the Joint Assembly of EEC-<br />

ACP States have already officially adopted the CFE<br />

definition of sustainable development as their central<br />

policy guideline. The President of the European Commission,<br />

Jacques Delors, has also acknowledged that<br />

"the current model of development is exhausted" and<br />

that social and ecological components need to be integrated<br />

into economic planning. For the time being<br />

these remain declarations of intent.<br />

Few people have realized that conservation is not<br />

a technical, but a social problem. World societies are<br />

losing their ethical and cultural roots, replacing them<br />

fast with consumptive ambitions and ultimately lifestyles.<br />

Conservation must therefore become, and be<br />

seen, as a people affair—as CFE pointed out—and not<br />

just a concern of experts. Their job—our job—is to<br />

make conservation issues transparent as a social problem,<br />

to let people participate in finding solutions and<br />

make conservation far more relevant to those who<br />

cause the problems and to those that suffer under<br />

them.<br />

Thus, the recommendations of CFE are still highly<br />

topical and relevant, but the basic message, especially<br />

in terms of its ethical approach and its definition of<br />

sustainable development, needs forceful reaffirmation.<br />

On the basis of an analysis of CFE, the WWF Family<br />

has undertaken a review of its own programme<br />

priorities and defined the areas in which the organization<br />

can make the greatest contribution to conservation<br />

worldwide. WWF's Global Priorities to the Year<br />

2000 are now being translated into concrete<br />

programmes at a national and international level. We

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!