01.03.2013 Views

Buenos Aires, Argentina - IUCN

Buenos Aires, Argentina - IUCN

Buenos Aires, Argentina - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The delegation of the Fisheries Agency of Japan, an Observer at the General<br />

Assembly, made the following statement for the record:<br />

"We believe that it is essential to ensure rational utilization of<br />

wildlife including marine living resources on the basis of the<br />

principle of sustainable development as agreed at the United<br />

Nations Conference on Environment and Development. It is no<br />

doubt that the long-term mission of <strong>IUCN</strong> concurs with this<br />

principle.<br />

"As regard the Antarctic sanctuary, the IWC Scientific Committee<br />

members are of the view that the sanctuary proposal lacks scientific<br />

grounds.<br />

"In a similar vein, such organizations as the Intergovernmental<br />

Oceanographic Commission (IOC) and the Scientific Committee<br />

on Antarctic Research (SCAR) consider that the sanctuary proposal<br />

has no significance from a scientific point of view and utilization<br />

of the Antarctic minke whale under the Revised Management<br />

Procedure (RMP) at least will cause no adverse impact on the<br />

minke whale stock or those of other whale species.<br />

"Further, the lack of scientific ground to this proposal is also<br />

evident from the fact that its sponsor, the French Government,<br />

itself openly admitted that the proposal is not scientifically based<br />

but political.<br />

"Thus the sanctuary proposal is nothing more than a disguised<br />

attempt to undermine the sustainable use of abundant minke<br />

whales under the RMP.<br />

"For this reason, this Recommendation is not totally acceptable.<br />

If <strong>IUCN</strong> adopts this Recommendation, it will impair <strong>IUCN</strong>'s<br />

credibility."<br />

The Inuit Brotherhood of Canada asked that it be recorded they would have<br />

abstained had there been a vote and the Inuit Circumpolar Conference that they<br />

would have voted against.<br />

19.80 - 19.90 Recommendations on conservation in Australia<br />

After these Recommendations had been adopted as a block and a number of<br />

State member delegations had recorded their abstentions, the Legal Adviser<br />

stated that all motions have to pass in both "Houses", and asked the President<br />

to ascertain whether these Recommendations commanded a majority among<br />

Category A members. The President did not accede to this request, saying he<br />

saw no reason to solicit statements from State members who did not feel<br />

obliged to make them.<br />

19.96 Antarctica and the Southern Ocean<br />

The delegation of State member United Kingdom made the following statement:<br />

"The UK State member delegation came to this General Assembly<br />

in a spirit of cooperation hoping to secure agreed texts by<br />

Minutes 35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!