01.03.2013 Views

Buenos Aires, Argentina - IUCN

Buenos Aires, Argentina - IUCN

Buenos Aires, Argentina - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

holders. Decentralizing this authority and providing<br />

rural people with proper resource management training<br />

is a fundamental institutional requirement for sustainable<br />

use of wild species. Rao suggested that the<br />

Guidelines need to emphasize that training in local<br />

resource management must accompany legal empowerment.<br />

Co-management<br />

Local participation in management is a critical institutional<br />

element in sustainable use. Les Carpenter, an<br />

Inuvialuit from the North West Territories (NWT),<br />

and Derek Melton, a resource manager from the NWT<br />

Government, explained how the Inuvialuit and Government<br />

work as "co-managers" of the muskox and<br />

caribou populations. Brian Child of the Department of<br />

National Parks and Wild Life Management, Zimbabwe,<br />

explained how co-management works in the<br />

CAMPFIRE Programme. He noted that adaptive management<br />

is vital in managing resources successfully; it<br />

is a process of trying, monitoring, assessing and<br />

retrying. The Guidelines need to emphasize process<br />

and have an objective.<br />

Economic Incentives<br />

All the presentations emphasized that economic<br />

motivation is also essential to ensuring sustainable use<br />

and that the Guidelines do not recognize this point<br />

adequately. David Bracket, Director General of the<br />

Canadian Fish and Wildlife Service, explained that it<br />

is extremely important to document the socio-economic<br />

values of wildlife in order to justify and maintain<br />

the financial and human resources required for effective<br />

research and conservation programmes.<br />

Jeff Sayer, of the Center for International Forestry<br />

Research, Indonesia, pointed out in his presentation<br />

that the question of forest management should<br />

revolve around recognition that societies and individuals<br />

will wish to optimize production of certain goods<br />

and services, and the maintenance of functions and<br />

components in accordance with their immediate<br />

needs. Perception of these needs will vary greatly from<br />

place to place and over time.<br />

During one of the discussions, a participant asked<br />

Brian Child if the CAMPFIRE model of wildlife management<br />

might not destroy the balance of nature by<br />

preferring one species over another. This could lead<br />

communities to destroy species to obtain more benefits,<br />

as has happened with hunting in Spain. Child<br />

responded, "Outside national parks, the choice is not<br />

between one antelope and another, but between habitat<br />

and agriculture. No system will produce a perfect<br />

balance, but local management is the only chance left<br />

for conservation outside protected areas."<br />

Eduardo Fuentes, UNDP GEF Biodiversity Coordinator,<br />

warned that the opportunity costs for implementing<br />

the Guidelines will be a major barrier for<br />

governments and resource users. The Guidelines<br />

should address this.<br />

Sustainability<br />

Several papers examined certain philosophical concepts<br />

about ecological sustainability. They concluded<br />

that the Guidelines oversimplify ecological sustainability<br />

and imply that there is an easy recipe for determining<br />

what uses are sustainable. "We will not always<br />

be able to give simple yes/no judgements on what is<br />

sustainable because many other factors are involved",<br />

said Grahame Webb, of Northern Territories, Australia.<br />

Rowan Martin, of Zimbabwe's Department of<br />

National Parks and Wild Life Management, explained<br />

that it is much harder to determine what is sustainable<br />

than what is not sustainable. "Looking at what uses<br />

are unsustainable will tell us a lot about what is<br />

needed for sustainability", Martin said. Webb also<br />

noted that the process is most important for understanding<br />

sustainability. Learning from using resources<br />

is the only way we will know how to manage them<br />

properly.<br />

David Cassells, a specialist in forest management<br />

and environmental planning in Australia, described a<br />

number of myths and misconceptions about sustainable<br />

forestry management. For example, (a) sustained<br />

yield equals sustainable development, (b) good forestry<br />

practice is automatically good for the environment,<br />

(c) temperate forests have a long history of<br />

sustainable management, (d) sustainable management<br />

of tropical forests is an unachievable goal, and<br />

(e) sustainable management is not economically<br />

viable. Cassells concludes that concepts of sustainability<br />

are not static in time.<br />

Ralph Roberts, a forestry expert from Canada,<br />

pointed out that "guidelines" for ecological sustainability<br />

have been prepared, primarily for forestry<br />

resources. He presented a useful comparison of definitions<br />

used in the <strong>IUCN</strong> Guidelines, such as principles,<br />

criterion, indicator and codes of practice, with similar<br />

definitions used in the International Tropical Timber<br />

Organization and CSCR Guidelines. Roberts suggested<br />

that <strong>IUCN</strong> should collaborate with other institutions<br />

in developing guidelines to avoid confusion<br />

of terms.<br />

Reports from the Workshops 61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!